Lamivudine significantly improves liver function in HBeAg-negative decompensated cirrhosis. However, the development of the biochemical breakthrough due to YMDD mutants is associated with fatal outcome.

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a major human pathogen associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, after decades of efforts, treatment of H. pylori remains a challenge for physicians, as there is no universally effective regimen. Due to the rising prevalence of antimicrobial resistance, mainly to clarithromycin, efficacy of standard triple therapies has declined to unacceptably low levels in most parts of the world. Novel regimens, specifically experimented to improve the therapeutic outcome against antibiotic-resistant H. pylori strains, are now recommended as first-line empirical treatment options providing high efficacy (reportedly > 90% in intention to treat analysis) even in high clarithromycin resistance settings. These include the bismuth quadruple, concomitant, sequential and hybrid therapies. Due to the rapid development of quinolone resistance, levofloxacin-based regimens should be reserved as second-line/rescue options. Adjunct use of probiotics has been proposed in order to boost eradication rates and decrease occurrence of treatment-related side effects. Molecular testing methods are currently available for the characterization of H. pylori therapeutic susceptibility, including genotypic detection of macrolide resistance and evaluation of the cytochrome P450 2C19 status known to affect the metabolism of proton pump inhibitors. In the future, use of these techniques may allow for culture-free, non-invasive tailoring of therapy for H. pylori infection.

The continuous rising of antimicrobial resistance has accounted for the declined efficiency of standard triple therapies, yielding < 70% eradication in most countries. Alternative first-line strategies have been proposed and largely validated and are now replacing standard-of-care therapies in areas with a high incidence of clarithromycin-resistance (> 20%). Such treatments include the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, concomitant, sequential and levofloxacin-based regimens, the later mainly designated, together with rifabutin-based therapies as second-line/rescue options. Clinicians should be aware of the local resistance pattern and maintain first-line eradication to levels > 90% (per-protocol efficacy). This will prevent both exposing the patient to repeated treatments and spreading of secondary antimicrobial resistance. In the future, perspectives of tailored therapy and a prophylactic vaccine will obviate any treatment concern.

Background: There are no guidelines on second‐line therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication failures of omeprazole–clarithromycin–amoxicillin triple therapy. Aim: To compare the efficacy of two second‐line therapies for persistent H. pylori infection. Methods: Over a 6‐year period, patients with persistent H. pylori infection following omeprazole–clarithromycin–amoxicillin eradication therapy were randomized to receive omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily, bismuth, 120 mg four times daily, metronidazole, 500 mg twice daily, and either tetracycline, 500 mg four times daily, or clarithromycin, 500 mg twice daily, given for 7 days. Before therapy, patients underwent endoscopy with biopsies for histology, culture and antibiotic susceptibility tests. H. pylori infection was confirmed by histology. Results: Of the 95 randomized patients, 88 (93%) completed the study. Age, sex, smoking, ulcer/non‐ulcer dyspepsia ratio and antibiotic resistance were not significantly different between the treatment groups. On intention‐to‐treat analysis, eradication was achieved in 41 of the 49 patients (84%; 95% confidence interval, 70.4–92.7%) and 27 of the 46 patients (59%; 95% confidence interval, 43.3–73.0%) of the tetracycline‐ and clarithromycin‐containing groups, respectively (P=0.007). On multivariate regression analysis, the sensitivity of H. pylori to metronidazole had a likelihood ratio of 5.2 (P=0.022), followed by the type of quadruple therapy (likelihood ratio, 4.4; P=0.036). Conclusions: Tetracycline‐containing quadruple rescue therapy is highly effective in treating H. pylori eradication failures of the omeprazole–amoxicillin–clarithromycin regimen.

BackgroundSeveral prognostic models have emerged in alcoholic hepatitis (AH), but lack of external validation precludes their universal use.AimTo validate the Maddrey Discriminant Function (DF); Glasgow Alcoholic Hepatitis Score (GAHS); Mayo End-stage Liver Disease (MELD); Age, Bilirubin, INR, Creatinine (ABIC); MELD-Na, UK End-stage Liver Disease (UKELD), and three scores of corticosteroid response at 1 week: an Early Change in Bilirubin Levels (ECBL), a 25% fall in bilirubin, and the Lille score.MethodsSeventy-one consecutive patients with biopsy-proven AH, admitted between November 2007-September 2011, were evaluated. The clinical and biochemical parameters were analysed to assess prognostic models with respect to 30- and 90-day mortality.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROCs) relative to 30-day/90-day mortality: MELD 0.79/0.84, DF 0.71/0.74, GAHS 0.75/0.78, ABIC 0.71/0.78, MELD-Na 0.68/0.76, UKELD 0.56/0.68. One-week rescoring yielded a trend towards improved predictive accuracies (30-day/90-day AUROCs: 0.69–0.84/0.77–0.86). In patients with admission DF ≥32 (n = 31), response to corticosteroids according to ECBL, 25% fall in bilirubin and the Lille model yielded AUROCs of 0.73/0.73, 0.78/0.72 and 0.81/0.82 for a 30-day/90-day outcome respectively. All models showed excellent negative predictive values (NPVs; range: 86–100%), while the positive ones were low (range: 17–50%).ConclusionsMELD, DF, GAHS, ABIC and scores of corticosteroid response proved to be valid in an independent cohort of biopsy-proven alcoholic hepatitis. MELD modifications incorporating sodium did not confer any prognostic advantage over classical MELD. Based on excellent NPVs, the models are best to identify patients at low risk of death.

Octreotide is thought to reduce splanchnic and variceal blood flow with minimal effects on the systemic circulation in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. However, we noticed significant bradycardia in some patients immediately after administration of bolus doses of octreotide. Therefore, we investigated the effect of intravenous octreotide on systemic hemodynamics in 59 patients with cirrhosis. In two double-blind, placebo-controlled protocols, 32 patients received a 25-micrograms bolus and 20 patients received an infusion of 50-micrograms/hr of octreotide/placebo. Immediately after the bolus dose of octreotide was administered, there were significant reductions in pulse rate (77 +/- 3 vs. 65 +/- 3 beats per minute, P < .01) and cardiac output (9.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 7.9 +/- 0.8 L/min; P < .01) and significant increases in mean arterial pressure (81 +/- 3 vs. 87 +/- 3 mm Hg; P < .05), mean pulmonary artery pressure (9.1 +/- 1.0 vs. 16.6 +/- 1.5 mm Hg; P < .01), right atrial pressure (3.8 +/- 0.8 vs. 6.6 +/- 1.0 mm Hg; P < .01), right ventricular pressure (7.1 +/- 0.6 vs. 12.5 +/- 1.3 mm Hg; P < .01), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (4.8 +/- 0.8 vs. 11.2 +/- 1.4 mm Hg; P < .01), systemic vascular resistance, and pulmonary vascular resistance. Thirty minutes after the start of the infusion, there were significant increases in mean right atrial pressure, right ventricular pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. This study suggests that intravenous octreotide has significant effects on the systemic circulation in patients with cirrhosis and that these effects appear to be more marked after administration of bolus doses.

In HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a, HBsAg decline >10% at 24 weeks is significantly associated with SR. The combination of the PARC rule and week 24 decline in HBsAg can identify almost two-thirds of patients who are unlikely to achieve SR. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01283074.

With the rising prevalence of antimicrobial resistance, the eradication rates ofHelicobacter pylori (H. pylori)with standard treatments are decreasing to unacceptable levels (i.e., ≤80%) in most countries. After these disappointing results, several authorities have proposed that infection withH. pylorishould be approached and treated as any other bacterial infectious disease. This implicates that clinicians should prescribe empirical treatments yielding a per protocol eradication of at least 90%. In recent years several treatments producing ≥90% cure rates have been proposed including sequential therapy, concomitant quadruple therapy, hybrid (dual-concomitant) therapy, and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy. These treatments are likely to represent the recommended first-line treatments in the near future. In the present paper, we are considering a series of critical issues regarding currently available means and approaches for the management ofH. pyloriinfection. Clinical needs and realistic endpoints are taken into account. Furthermore, emerging strategies for the eradication ofH. pyloriand the existing evidence of their clinical validation and widespread applicability are discussed.