The role of oral Vitamin K administration in the reversal of anticoagulation is not yet clear because of a paucity of data on the early effects of treatment, apparent differences in efficacy between preparations and a lack of data comparing oral with intravenous administration. We have compared the effects on the International Normalized Ratio (INR) and activities of the Vitamin K‐dependent clotting factors II, VII, IX and X at 4 h and 24 h after administration of three oral Vitamin K preparations and of intravenous Vitamin K in 64 anticoagulated patients who required non‐urgent partial correction of anticoagulation. Our data confirm that correction of anticoagulation is more rapid after intravenous administration of Vitamin K than after oral administration of similar or larger doses. At 24 h, satisfactory correction of INR can be achieved using low‐dose Vitamin K given by either the intravenous or oral route. Our data, and that from previous studies, suggest that there may be differences in efficacy between orally administered products. Administration of Vitamin K by either route was accompanied by changes in the activities of the Vitamin K‐dependent clotting factors that reflected their respective biological half‐lives. In the 24 h after treatment, the relationship between the INR and the individual Vitamin K‐dependent clotting factors was similar to that described previously in stable anticoagulated patients. We conclude that the reversal of anticoagulation with warfarin is achieved more rapidly by intravenous administration of Vitamin K. Satisfactory, but slower, reversal of anticoagulation can be effected using oral Vitamin K, but there may be differences in efficacy between the products tested in our study.
Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are frequently used in the prophylaxis or treatment of venous thrombosis, acute coronary syndromes and peri-operative bridging. Major bleeding occurs in 1-4% depending on dose and underlying condition. Protamine is recommended for reversal but only partially reverses the anti-Xa activity and there are very limited data on clinical effectiveness. We retrospectively studied the effect of emergency reversal of LMWH with protamine in actively bleeding patients and patients requiring emergency surgery in our institution. Eighteen patients were identified through haematology referral/pharmacy records of protamine prescriptions between 1998 and 2009. Case notes were checked for the reversal indication, type/dose of LMWH, dose and clinical response to protamine, timing in relation to the last dose of LMWH and anti-Xa levels before and after protamine. All but one patient received enoxaparin. Fourteen were actively bleeding, three required emergency surgery without active bleeding and one had an accidental overdose without bleeding. The three patients requiring surgery had an uneventful procedure. In 12 of 14 patients with active bleeding, protamine could be evaluated. Bleeding stopped in eight. In the four with continuing bleeding, one had an additional coagulopathy. Protamine only partially affected anti-Xa levels. Protamine may be of use in reversing bleeding associated with LMWH but not in all patients. Anti-Xa levels were useful to assess the amount of anticoagulation before protamine administration but unhelpful in assessing its effect. Better reversal agents and methods to monitor LMWH therapy are required.
Contact factor pathway deficiencies do not cause surgical bleeding but make heparin monitoring by the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and activated clotting time (ACT) unreliable. Heparin monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery in these patients is particularly challenging. Here we describe heparin monitoring during CPB using the chromogenic anti Xa assay in two patients with severe factor XII deficiency (FXII < 0.01 U/mL) and one patient with severe prekallikrein (PK) deficiency (PK < 0.01 U/mL). Anti Xa levels of the three patients during CPB varied between 3.8 and 4.8 U/mL in keeping with a control group (mean anti Xa 4.5 U/mL and ACT > 480 s). There were no bleeding or thrombotic complications. We also found that detection of severe PK deficiency by the APTT in the PK deficient patient was dependent on the reagent used and discuss the sensitivity of different APTT reagents for contact factor deficiencies. We conclude that the sensitivity of APTT methods for contact pathway deficiencies is highly variable and although insensitivity is not a clinical problem in terms of bleeding, it can be a cause of discrepancy between different APTT reagents and the ACT. This can lead to confusion about a possible haemorrhagic tendency and delays in surgery. If these patients need to undergo cardiac surgery requiring high dose heparin treatment, monitoring by chromogenic anti Xa assay is a good alternative.
Summary Lepirudin (r‐hirudin) is one of the two alternative anticoagulants licensed to treat patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Manufacturer’s guidelines state that lepirudin should be monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) ratio. However, several studies have demonstrated a plateau effect of higher concentrations of lepirudin on APTT ratios and variable results when comparing different APTT reagents. This study compares APTT ratios (using two different APTT reagents) with two other commercially available methods for directly quantifying plasma lepirudin levels: ecarin chromogenic assay and prothrombinase‐induced clotting time in 95 samples from five patients receiving lepirudin anticoagulation for HIT.
Using non-invasive methods we report here that the stability of the pre-corneal tear film is lower in the brown eye than in the blue eye. The average stability in the blue eye is 15.8 sec (SD +/- 5.8) and in the brown eye it is 12.3 sec (SD +/- 2.9). On average, instillation of topical anaesthetics, benoxinate hydrochloride (0.4%) or amethacaine hydrochloride (0.5%), depress the stability of the pre-corneal tear film in blue eyes but not in brown eyes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.