Objective. To examine the relationship between changes in anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody levels and the risk of renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), using data from 2 randomized, controlled trials.Methods. Analyses were based on 487 patients with SLE and a history of lupus nephritis who had an anti-dsDNA antibody titer >15 IU/ml at baseline, as measured by Farr assay. Results are presented for the combined population of patients, the placebo arms, and the drug treatment arms in which a dsDNA-based bioconjugate (abetimus sodium; LJP 394) was used.Results. Changes in anti-dsDNA antibody levels were inversely correlated with changes in the C3 level (P < 0.0001 in both trials). Cox proportional hazards regression models showed that changes in anti-dsDNA antibody levels correlated with the risk of renal flare. The models predicted that a point estimate of a 50% reduction in anti-dsDNA antibody levels is associated with a 52% reduction (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 26-68%, nominal P ‫؍‬ 0.0007) and a 53% reduction (95% CI 33-69%, nominal P < 0.0001) in the risk of renal flare in the 2 trials, respectively. In the 2 trials, the incidence of renal flare was lower in patients with sustained reductions in anti-dsDNA antibodies (3.0% and 4.1%, respectively) than in patients with stable or increasing antibody levels (21.3% and 20.3%, respectively).Conclusion. Changes in anti-dsDNA antibody levels were directly correlated with the risk of renal flare and inversely correlated with changes in the C3 level. Reducing anti-dsDNA antibody levels may represent a therapeutic objective in SLE patients with lupus nephritis, because it is associated with a reduced risk of renal flare.Anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies are diagnostic for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (1) and have been implicated in the underlying pathogenesis of SLE renal disease and other disease manifestations (2-7). Immune complexes containing anti-

No abstract

No abstract

A B S T R A C T The administration of vasodilating agents such as bradykinin and acetylcholine cause an increase in urinary sodium excretion. Yet the mechanisms involved in this natriuretic effect are not clear. Recent studies with another renal vasodilator, secretin have shown this drug also causes a profound increase in renal blood flow but without major changes in sodium excretion. To attempt to delineate the basis of this difference in sodium excretion with these drugs, the renal functional effects of secretin and bradykinin were compared at an equivalent vasodilating dose. Bradykinin increased renal blood flow from 222 to 342 ml/min, urine volume from 0.2 to 1.2 ml/min, and urine sodium excretion from 28 to 115,ueq/min. Urine osmolality fell from 1,230 to 401 mosmol/kg. Secretin caused a comparable increase in renal blood flow (216 to 325 ml/min) while changes in urine flow, sodium excretion, and urine osmolality were significantly less.In further studies papillary plasma flow was estimated using the albumin accumulation technique. Control papillary plasma flow was 29 ml/min per 100 g. Bradykinin increased urinary sodium excretion 108 seq/min and decreased urinary osmolality from 1,254 to 516 mosmol/kg in association with a rise in papillary plasma flow to 62 ml/min per 100 g. Urine sodium excretion, urinary osmolality, and urine flow rate, as well as papillary plasma flow rate (32 ml/min per 100 g) were unchanged from control when secretin was administered. Studies with acetylcholine were qualitatively similar to those of bradykinin. Renal blood flow increased from 150 to 248 ml/min, urinary sodium excretion increased from 20 to 243 geq/min, urinary osmolality decreased from 1,237 to 411 mos-

No abstract