No abstract

No abstract

Thalidomide is a racemic glutamic acid derivative approved in the US for erythema nodosum leprosum, a complication of leprosy. In addition, its use in various inflammatory and oncologic conditions is being investigated. Thalidomide interconverts between the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers in plasma, with protein binding of 55% and 65%, respectively. More than 90% of the absorbed drug is excreted in the urine and faeces within 48 hours. Thalidomide is minimally metabolised by the liver, but is spontaneously hydrolysed into numerous renally excreted products. After a single oral dose of thalidomide 200 mg (as the US-approved capsule formulation) in healthy volunteers, absorption is slow and extensive, resulting in a peak concentration (C(max)) of 1-2 mg/L at 3-4 hours after administration, absorption lag time of 30 minutes, total exposure (AUC( infinity )) of 18 mg. h/L, apparent elimination half-life of 6 hours and apparent systemic clearance of 10 L/h. Thalidomide pharmacokinetics are best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Because of the low solubility of the drug in the gastrointestinal tract, thalidomide exhibits absorption rate-limited pharmacokinetics (the 'flip-flop' phenomenon), with its elimination rate being faster than its absorption rate. The apparent elimination half-life of 6 hours therefore represents absorption, not elimination. The 'true' apparent volume of distribution was estimated to be 16L by use of the faster elimination-rate half-life. Multiple doses of thalidomide 200 mg/day over 21 days cause no change in the pharmacokinetics, with a steady-state C(max) (C(ss)(max)) of 1.2 mg/L. Simulation of 400 and 800 mg/day also shows no accumulation, with C(ss)(max) of 3.5 and 6.0 mg/L, respectively. Multiple-dose studies in cancer patients show pharmacokinetics comparable with those in healthy populations at similar dosages. Thalidomide exhibits a dose-proportional increase in AUC at doses from 50 to 400 mg. Because of the low solubility of thalidomide, C(max) is less than proportional to dose, and t(max) is prolonged with increasing dose. Age, sex and smoking have no effect on the pharmacokinetics of thalidomide, and the effect of food is minimal. Thalidomide does not alter the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives, and is also unlikely to interact with warfarin and grapefruit juice. Since thalidomide is mainly hydrolysed and passively excreted, its pharmacokinetics are not expected to change in patients with impaired liver or kidney function.

No abstract

Previous in vitro studies in rat microsomal preparations suggested that thalidomide is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 system (CYP). In this study, we examined the extent of thalidomide metabolism by preparations of pooled human microsomes, microsomes containing cloned human CYP isozymes (CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A4), and Hansen’s disease patients. Results indicated that thalidomide was a poor substrate for CYP isozymes. Alteration of incubation buffer, pH, incubation time, and microsome and thalidomide concentrations did not increase the production of any metabolites. Thalidomide also did not inhibit metabolism of CYP‐specific substrates and therefore any interactions with other drugs that are metabolized by the same enzyme system are unlikely. Hansen’s patients were given a single oral dose of thalidomide (400 mg), and their blood and urine were collected at time points up to 72 hours, processed, and analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry. Although thalidomide was present in the plasma and urine, no metabolites were found in the plasma and very low amounts of the 5‐OH thalidomide metabolite were present in the urine. These results suggest that thalidomide does not undergo significant metabolism by human CYP and that clinically important interactions between thalidomide and drugs that are also metabolized by this enzyme system are unlikely. The major route of thalidomide breakdown in humans and animals is through spontaneous hydrolysis with subsequent elimination in the urine. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biochem Toxicol 14:140–147, 2000