The SEL-I-METRY trial (EudraCT No 2015-002269-47) is the first multicentre trial to investigate the role of 123I and 131I SPECT/CT-based tumour dosimetry to predict response to radioiodine therapy. Standardised dosimetry methodology is essential to provide a robust evidence-base for absorbed dose–response thresholds for molecular radiotherapy (MRT). In this paper a practical standardised protocol is used to establish the first network of centres with consistent methods of radioiodine activity quantification. Nine SPECT/CT systems at eight centres were set-up for quantitative radioiodine imaging. The dead-time of the systems was characterised for up to 2.8 GBq 131I. Volume dependent calibration factors were measured on centrally reconstructed images of 123I and 131I in six (0.8–196 ml) cylinders. Validation of image quantification using these calibration factors was performed on three systems, by imaging a 3D-printed phantom mimicking a patient’s activity distribution. The percentage differences between the activities measured in the SPECT/CT image and those measured by the radionuclide calibrator were calculated. Additionally uncertainties on the SPECT/CT-based activities were calculated to indicate the limit on the quantitative accuracy of this method. For systems set-up to image high 131I count rates, the count rate versus activity did not peak below 2.8 GBq and fit a non-paralysable model. The dead-times and volume-dependent calibration factors were comparable between systems of the same model and crystal thickness. Therefore a global calibration curve could be fitted to each. The errors on the validation phantom activities’ were comparable to the measurement uncertainties derived from uncertainty analysis, at 10% and 16% on average for 123I and 131I respectively in a 5 cm sphere. In conclusion, the dead-time and calibration factors varied between centres, with different models of system. However, global calibration factors may be applied to the same system model with the same crystal thickness, to simplify set-up of future multi-centre MRT studies.
Measurements of radiation distributions in the vicinity of the couch were undertaken for a number of projections commonly employed during cardiac radiological studies. Three types of investigations were considered; cardiac catheterisations, pacemaker implants and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties. The radiation dose to staff involved in these procedures was estimated. For each group of staff, the maximum annual workload and the workload which would necessitate an individual becoming a classified radiation worker may be deduced from an expression given in the text.
This study was undertaken to determine whether standard salivary gland scintigraphy may be used for the objective assessment of salivary gland sialogogues, in particular oral pilocarpine, in the treatment of post-radiotherapy xerostomia. Nine patients, with xerostomia following radiotherapy to the head and neck region underwent salivary gland scintigraphy with technetium-99m pertechnetate (40 MBq) both before and following 1 month of oral pilocarpine (5 mg tds). For each scan, the percentage uptake in the first 14 min, the peak uptake, time to peak uptake and the percentage of activity excreted following lemon juice stimulation were calculated. The results were correlated with the subjective response as assessed by questionnaire and visual analogue scale. We found no correlation between subjective response and any of the four scan parameters analysed. We could not identify any parameter that predicted those patients who would respond to pilocarpine. In addition, only one parameter, the percentage of activity excreted following stimulation, correlated with previous dose of radiotherapy to the gland. In conclusion, in this study salivary gland scintigraphy did not appear to correlate with or predict response to oral pilocarpine. However, future studies might consider performing salivary gland scintigraphy prior to radiotherapy as well as at differing time points following the commencement of pilocarpine.
Aim Flow redistribution is not uncommonly performed as a treatment strategy to optimize delivery of radioembolization particles to the liver. We quantitatively evaluated the effect of vessel embolization to promote flow redistribution when performing selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for liver metastases, and assessed long-term outcomes of treatment. Materials and Methods One hundred and fifty-eight SIRT procedures over an 8-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-three patients who underwent partial/whole embolization of the left hepatic artery were compared to a control group of 18 patients who did not receive any hepatic embolization as part of their work up. Counts were measured for each patient on both the post-99mTcMAA injection, and the post-90Y microspheres injection imaging. Recurrence and survival rates were also measured. Results A statistically significant shift in the right:left ratio between planning and treatment procedures was seen in patients who had vessel embolization in favor of the embolized lobe (p = 0.014). There was no significant difference in the time to recurrence in the embolized lobes versus the nonembolized lobes. No significant difference in overall survival was detected between the two cohorts. Conclusion To facilitate safe whole liver treatment, it is sometimes necessary to partially or completely occlude main or accessory hepatic arteries. This study shows that the success of flow redistribution strategies can be quantitatively measured, and there is no adverse impact on time to recurrence or overall survival outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.