A number of studies have demonstrated considerable plasma volume changes during and after exposure to different environmental and physiological conditions. These changes are thought to result from transient fluid shifts into (haemodilution) and out of (haemoconcentration) the intravascular space. If the levels of plasma constituents are to be routinely measured for research purposes or used as indicators of training adaptation or the health of an athlete, then it is important to consider the dynamic nature of plasma volume. Controversy still exists over the relevance of plasma volume interactions with plasma constituent levels, and while some investigators have taken plasma volume shifts into account, others have chosen to ignore these changes. Bouts of acute exercise have been shown to produce a transient haemoconcentration immediately after long distance running, bicycle ergometry and both maximal and submaximal swimming exercise. While these changes are transient, lasting only a few hours, other studies have reported a longer term haemodilution following acute exercise. In addition, endurance training has been shown to cause long term expansion of the plasma volume. It would, therefore, seem important to consider the influence of plasma volume changes on plasma solutes routinely measured for research, and as markers of training adaptation, prior to arriving at conclusions and recommendations based purely on their measured plasma level. To further confound this issue, plasma volume changes are known to be associated with heat acclimatisation, hydration state, physical training and postural changes, all of which may differ from one experiment or exercise bout to the next, and should thus be taken into account.

The distinction between positive and negative training adaptation is an important prerequisite in the identification of any marker for monitoring training in athletes. To investigate the glutamine responses to progressive endurance training, twenty healthy males were randomly assigned to a training group or a non-exercising control group. The training group performed a progressive (3 to 6 x 90 minute sessions per week at 70 % V.O (2max)) six-week endurance training programme on a cycle ergometer, while the control group did not participate in any exercise during this period. Performance assessments (V.O (2max) and time to exhaustion) and resting blood samples (for haemoglobin concentration, haematocrit, cortisol, ferritin, creatine kinase, glutamine, uric acid and urea analysis) were obtained prior to the commencement of training (Pre) and at the end of week 2, week 4 and week 6. The training group showed significant improvements in time to exhaustion (p < 0.01), and V.O (2max) (p < 0.05) at all time points (except week 2 for V.O (2max)), while the control group performance measures did not change. In the training group, haemoglobin concentration and haematocrit were significantly lower (p < 0.01) than pretraining values at week 2 and 4, as percentage changes in plasma volume indicated a significant (p < 0.01) haemodilution (+ 6 - 9 %) was present at week 2, 4 and 6. No changes were seen in the control group. In the training group, plasma glutamine (week 2, 4 and 6), creatine kinase (week 2 and 4), uric acid (week 2 and 4) and urea (week 2 and 4) all increased significantly from pretraining levels. No changes in cortisol or ferritin were found in the training group and no changes in any blood variables were present in the control group. Plasma glutamine was the only blood variable to remain significantly above pretraining (966 +/- 32 micromol . 1 (-1)) levels at week 6 (1176 +/- 24 micromol . 1 (-1); p < 0.05) The elevation seen here in glutamine levels, after 6 weeks of progressive endurance training, is in contrast to previous reports of decreased glutamine concentrations in overtrained athletes. In conclusion, 6 weeks of progressive endurance training steadily increased plasma glutamine levels, which may prove useful in the monitoring of training responses.

No abstract