The 50 FTW and 30 CST can be reliable measures of physical performance. However, because we found a practice effect at the baseline assessment, a practice trial should be allowed before data collection begins. Because only two trials of the 30 CST were completed, further research is required to confirm whether scores at the initial assessment become stable on repeated testing.
Skeletal tuberculosis constitutes 1% to 3% of extrapulmonary cases and involvement of foot bones is rare. Lack of awareness and a confusing clinical and radiological picture often lead to a delay in diagnosis. We reviewed 23 feet seen over a 3.5-year period. Most cases were children or young adults less than 40 years of age; isolated bony involvement was seen in 10 feet, with the calcaneus being involved in five cases. Articular involvement at presentation was seen in 13 cases and these cases had significantly higher delays in diagnosis. Twenty cases responded to antitubercular therapy alone while one case had to be operated (there was one fatal outcome). Complete resolution of sequestra was seen with antitubercular therapy alone. The results were better in cases with isolated bony involvement, while cases with joint involvement had residual sequelae in the form of stiffness or pain. Two patients were advised arthrodesis. Early diagnosis and antitubercular therapy is essential to prevent joint involvement from periarticular bony lesions; surgical intervention is rarely needed. A high index of suspicion has to be maintained in high risk groups like Asian immigrants. Concomitant extraskeletal lesions may not always be present.
BackgroundThe Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) has nine scales that each measure an aspect of the multidimensional construct of health literacy. All scales have good psychometric properties. However, it is the interpretations of data within contexts that must be proven valid, not just the psychometric properties of a measurement instrument. The purpose of this study was to establish the extent of concordance and discordance between individual patient and clinician interpretations of HLQ data in the context of complex case management.MethodsSixteen patients with complex needs completed the HLQ and were interviewed to discuss the reasons for their answers. Also, the clinicians of each of these patients completed the HLQ about their patient, and were interviewed to discuss the reasons for their answers. Thematic analysis of HLQ scores and interview data determined the extent of concordance between patient and clinician HLQ responses, and the reasons for discordance.ResultsHighest concordance (80%) between patient and clinician item-response pairs was seen in Scale 1 and highest discordance (56%) was seen in Scale 6. Four themes were identified to explain discordance: 1) Technical or literal meaning of specific words; 2) Patients’ changing or evolving circumstances; 3) Different expectations and criteria for assigning HLQ scores; and 4) Different perspectives about a patient’s reliance on healthcare providers.ConclusionThis study shows that the HLQ can act as an adjunct to clinical practice to help clinicians understand a patient’s health literacy challenges and strengths early in a clinical encounter. Importantly, clinicians can use the HLQ to detect differences between their own perspectives about a patient’s health literacy and the patient’s perspective, and to initiate discussion to explore this. Provision of training to better detect these differences may assist clinicians to provide improved care.The outcomes of this study contribute to the growing body of international validation evidence about the use of the HLQ in different contexts. More specifically, this study has shown that the HLQ has measurement veracity at the patient and clinician level and may support clinicians to understand patients’ health literacy and enable a deeper engagement with healthcare services.
For those awaiting joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee, the current investigation found that the WOMAC Function scale, 30-second chair stand test, and 50-foot timed walk demonstrated the most evidence of validity. The Patient Specific Functional Scale might complement other measures by capturing a different aspect of physical function.
PCEHRs can produce tangible benefits for patients. However, maximum benefits will be realised when PCEHRs contain a complete collection of relevant health information and are carefully designed for easy use.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.