The bicyclam AMD3100 is known as a small synthetic inhibitor of the CXCL12-binding chemokine receptor CXCR4. Here, we show that AMD3100 also binds to the alternative CXCL12 receptor CXCR7. CXCL12 or AMD3100 alone activate ␤-arrestin recruitment to CXCR7, which we identify as a previously unreported signaling pathway of CXCR7. In addition, AMD3100 increases CXCL12 binding to CXCR7 and CXCL12-induced conformational rearrangements in the receptor dimer as measured by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. Moreover, small but reproducible increases in the potency of CXCL12-induced arrestin recruitment to CXCR7 by AMD3100 are observed. Taken together, our data suggest that AMD3100 is an allosteric agonist of CXCR7. The finding that AMD3100 not only binds CXCR4, but also to CXCR7, with opposite effects on the two receptors, calls for caution in the use of the compound as a tool to dissect CXCL12 effects on the respective receptors in vitro and in vivo.Chemokine receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family. GPCR binding by ligands is believed to alter receptor conformation in a way that is transmitted to the cytoplasmic face of the receptor and triggers the activation of the heterotrimeric G-proteins as well as that of other G-protein-independent effectors. Although ligand-induced conformational change of the receptor has for long been deduced from functional data, the advent of new biophysical methods has eventually permitted direct measurement of such changes in native receptors present in the plasma membrane of live cells. bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) is one of the resonance energy transfer techniques used to show constitutive dimerization of chemokine receptors and other GPCRs (Terrillon and Bouvier, 2004). Constitutively dimeric GPCR BRET couples can also be used to probe receptor conformation, because BRET depends on the distance between the luminescence donor [Renilla reniformis luciferase (RLuc)] and the acceptor [the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)]. For instance, the use of CXCR4-RLuc/ CXCR4-YFP dimers as sensors permitted the detection of different conformations in a panel of CXCR4 mutants (Berchiche et al., 2007). Moreover, dimeric BRET sensors permit the measurement of ligand-induced conformational changes in the receptor dimer (Ayoub et al., 2004;Percherancier et al., 2005). These effects are not only observed for cognate agonists but also for small synthetic ligands that may be orthosteric or allosteric modulators.Allosteric modulation of receptor-ligand interactions results from binding of a second (allosteric) ligand to a distinct site on the receptor, in a way that does not directly compete with binding of the cognate (orthosteric) ligand. Binding of the allosteric ligand may decrease the affinity of the cognate ligand, resulting in negative allosteric modulation. Conversely, the presence of the allosteric modulator may increase binding of the cognate ligand, called positive allosteric modulation (May et al., 2007). Allosteric ligands may also have ...

Chemokines and chemokine receptors are extensively and broadly involved in cancer metastasis. Previously, we demonstrated that epigenetic silencing of the chemokine CXCL12 sensitizes breast and colon cancer cells to endocrine signaling and metastasis to distant tissues. Yet, the precise mechanism whereby CXCL12 production by tumor cells regulates dissemination remains unclear. Here, we show that administration of CXCL12 extended survival of tumorbearing mice by potently limiting metastasis of colorectal carcinoma or murine melanoma. Because secreted CXCL12 is a mixture of monomeric and dimeric species in equilibrium, oligomeric variants that either promote (monomer) or halt (dimer) chemotaxis were used to dissect the mechanisms interrupting carcinoma metastasis. Monomeric CXCL12 mobilized intracellular calcium, inhibited cAMP signaling, recruited β-arrestin-2, and stimulated filamentous-actin accumulation and cell migration. Dimeric CXCL12 activated G-protein-dependent calcium flux, adenylyl cyclase inhibition, and the rapid activation of ERK1/2, but only weakly, if at all, recruited arrestin, stimulated actin polymerization, or promoted chemotaxis. NMR analyses illustrated that CXCL12 monomers made specific contacts with CXCR4 that were lost following dimerization. Our results establish the potential for inhibiting CXCR4-mediated metastasis by administration of CXCL12. Chemokine-mediated migration and β-arrestin responses did not dictate the antitumor effect of CXCL12. We conclude that cellular migration is tightly regulated by selective CXCR4 signaling evoked by unique interactions with distinct ligand quaternary structures.malignancy | functional selectivity | cellular idling | cancer therapeutics | chemokine oligomer C hemokines are chemoattractant cytokines that bind G-protein-coupled receptors and are mediators for many physiological processes including cell trafficking, angiogenesis, and embryogenesis (1-3). Chemokine receptor signaling is linked with cancer metastasis as well as infiltration of tumor-associated immune cells, neoangiogenesis, and proliferation (4, 5). Chemokines as primary mediators of metastasis were first identified by Muller and colleagues who implicated the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in tumor cell trafficking (6-8). At least 23 different cancers have been shown to express elevated levels of CXCR4, sensitizing these cancers to CXCL12 gradients in distant tissues (9). CXCL12 is constitutively expressed in the bone marrow, lungs, and liver, which are common tissues of metastatic growth. Efforts to block metastatic dissemination have mainly used small molecule antagonists of CXCR4 (10) to limit cancer malignancy (11, 12). However, this avenue has proven difficult to move into the clinic (5, 12), suggesting alternative strategies to interfere with CXCR4-guided metastatic homing (for example, by the use of agonists rather than antagonists) are required. Our previous data indicate that epigenetic silencing of the Cxcl12 promoter enhances metastasis of colonic and mammary carcinoma, implicating...

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key signaling molecules and are intensely studied. Whereas GPCRs recognizing small-molecules have been successfully targeted for drug discovery, proteinrecognizing GPCRs, such as the chemokine receptors, claim few drugs or even useful small molecule reagents. This reflects both the difficulties that attend protein-protein interface inhibitor discovery, and the lack of structures for these targets. Imminent structure determination of chemokine receptor CXCR4 motivated docking screens for new ligands against a homology model and subsequently the crystal structure. More than 3 million molecules were docked against the model and then against the crystal structure; 24 and 23 high-scoring compounds from the respective screens were tested experimentally. Docking against the model yielded only one antagonist, which resembled known ligands and lacked specificity, whereas the crystal structure docking yielded four that were dissimilar to previously known scaffolds and apparently specific. Intriguingly, several were potent and relatively small, with IC 50 values as low as 306 nM, ligand efficiencies as high as 0.36, and with efficacy in cellular chemotaxis. The potency and efficiency of these molecules has few precedents among protein-protein interface inhibitors, and supports structure-based efforts to discover leads for chemokine GPCRs.drug design | virtual screening | promiscuous aggregation G -protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a central role in many normal physiological pathways and altered diseased states, and are the targets of approximately 30% of marketed drugs (1). Ligand discovery against small-molecule GPCRs such as the bioamine receptors has been particularly productive, as have structure-based screens against their crystal structures (2-5). Targeting larger-molecule-recognizing GPCRs has been more difficult. Although multiple reagents are available for lipid and peptidergic GPCRs, their molecular weights are substantially higher than those typical for bioamine receptors, and they are less ligand efficient. This reflects the challenges faced in ligand discovery against peptide-protein and lipid-protein interfaces. These difficulties are still more acute against chemokine GPCRs, which recognize folded proteins of ∼100 amino acids in length and are thus protein-protein interface (PPI) targets (6). Although there are several example drugs in this class, such as maraviroc, plerixafor, and vorapaxar, finding organic molecules with good affinity and the physical properties of oral drugs is notoriously difficult for PPI targets, as reflected in the high molecular weight and hydrophobicity of the few PPI drugs (7).A public competition to predict ligand complexes with the structure of C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) inspired us to bring structure-based discovery to bear against a key member of the chemokine family (8). CXCR4 natively recognizes the CXCL12 chemokine, an 8-kDa protein. Like many other PPI targets, CXCR4 plays a key signaling role: it is constitutively expres...

CXCR7 is an atypical chemokine receptor that signals through ␤-arrestin in response to agonists without detectable activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins. Its cognate chemokine ligand CXCL12 also binds CXCR4, a chemokine receptor of considerable clinical interest. Here we report that TC14012, a peptidomimetic inverse agonist of CXCR4, is an agonist on CXCR7. The potency of ␤-arrestin recruitment to CXCR7 by TC14012 is much higher than that of the previously reported CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 and differs only by one log from that of the natural ligand CXCL12 (EC 50 350 nM for TC14012, as compared with 30 nM for CXCL12 and 140 M for AMD3100). Moreover, like CXCL12, TC14012 leads to Erk 1/2 activation in U373 glioma cells that express only CXCR7, but not CXCR4. Given that with TC14012 and AMD3100 two structurally unrelated CXCR4 antagonists turn out to be agonists on CXCR7, this likely reflects differences in the activation mechanism of the arrestin pathway by both receptors. To identify the receptor domain responsible for these opposed effects, we investigated CXCR4 and CXCR7 C terminus-swapping chimeras. Using quantitative bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, we find that the CXCR7 receptor core formed by the seven-transmembrane domains and the connecting loops determines the agonistic activity of both TC14012 and AMD3100. Moreover, we find that the CXCR7 chimera bearing the CXCR4 C-terminal constitutively associates with arrestin in the absence of ligands. Our data suggest that the CXCR4 and CXCR7 cores share ligand-binding surfaces for the binding of the synthetic ligands, indicating that CXCR4 inhibitors should be tested also on CXCR7. CXCR4 is a seven-transmembrane domain (7TMR)4 chemokine receptor of considerable clinical interest, involved in stem cell homing to bone marrow niches, cancer biology and metastasis, and HIV infection. Synthetic CXCR4 ligands are being developed, and the CXCR4 blocker AMD3100 has reached the clinic for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells from donor bone marrow. The natural CXCR4 ligand, the chemokine CXCL12 (also called SDF-1), has later been found to also bind the atypical chemokine receptor CXCR7, which in addition recognizes the chemokine CXCL11 (also called I-TAC) (1, 2). CXCR7 is atypical in that no classical heterotrimeric G-protein signaling pathways are observed and in that it does not induce chemotaxis of motile cells. However, CXCR7 sets off G-protein-independent signaling via the ␤-arrestin pathway, leading to activation of the Erk 1/2 kinases (3, 4). Functionally, CXCR7 has been implicated in cancer cell growth and transendothelial migration (2, 5, 6). Intriguingly, CXCR7 and CXCR4 can heteromerize, and this attenuates CXCR4 G-protein signaling (7,8). Modulation of CXCR4 has been suggested as a major role of CXCR7 (9).Given that CXCR4 and CXCR7 share a chemokine ligand, we have previously tested the effects of AMD3100 on CXCR7 and found that it induces arrestin recruitment at high doses on this receptor, contrary to its effect on CXCR4 (3). This findin...