2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1101133108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monomeric and dimeric CXCL12 inhibit metastasis through distinct CXCR4 interactions and signaling pathways

Abstract: Chemokines and chemokine receptors are extensively and broadly involved in cancer metastasis. Previously, we demonstrated that epigenetic silencing of the chemokine CXCL12 sensitizes breast and colon cancer cells to endocrine signaling and metastasis to distant tissues. Yet, the precise mechanism whereby CXCL12 production by tumor cells regulates dissemination remains unclear. Here, we show that administration of CXCL12 extended survival of tumorbearing mice by potently limiting metastasis of colorectal carcin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
236
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
24
236
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies demonstrated that a unique feature of GPCRs is their capability to induce a variety of signaling cascades via activation of the same receptor (17,18,20,21,48). These findings are in accordance with the previous observation that CXCL12-induced cell migration, via CXCR4, is independent of its ability to induce cytokine production via the same receptor (49).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Previous studies demonstrated that a unique feature of GPCRs is their capability to induce a variety of signaling cascades via activation of the same receptor (17,18,20,21,48). These findings are in accordance with the previous observation that CXCL12-induced cell migration, via CXCR4, is independent of its ability to induce cytokine production via the same receptor (49).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Dimeric CXCL12, in contrast to monomeric CXCL12, has been found to be resistant to proteolytic inactivation (Takekoshi et al 2012), suggesting a means by which the half-life of the chemokine may be extended in a tissue-specific manner. Furthermore, dimeric CXCL12 elicits CXCR4-dependent Ca 2þ flux, adenylyl cyclase inhibition, and activation of ERK1/2, but not chemotaxis (Drury et al 2011). The interaction of dimeric CXCL12 with CXCR4 is also influenced by posttranslational sulfation of extracellular tyrosines (Veldkamp et al 2006Seibert et al 2008).…”
Section: Cxcr4 As the Chemokine Receptor That Inhibits Cxcr3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the upregulation of SDF-1-degrading proteases significantly reduces secreted bioactive soluble SDF-1 in the BM interstitial fluid, consequently with reduced ability to support CXCR4 driven BMSC migration. What has come to light recently is that at very high concentrations SDF-1 switches the signaling pathway for CXCR4 (''biased agonism''), possibly by forming dimers, 59,60 from G-protein-coupled to b-arrestin mediated pathways. 59,61 When that switch occurs, one consequence is direct inhibition of cell migration, in effect retaining cells in place.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%