This review compares the biological and physiological function of Sigma receptors [σRs] and their potential therapeutic roles. Sigma receptors are widespread in the central nervous system and across multiple peripheral tissues. σRs consist of sigma receptor one (σ1R) and sigma receptor two (σ2R) and are expressed in numerous regions of the brain. The sigma receptor was originally proposed as a subtype of opioid receptors and was suggested to contribute to the delusions and psychoses induced by benzomorphans such as SKF-10047 and pentazocine. Later studies confirmed that σRs are non-opioid receptors (not an µ opioid receptor) and play a more diverse role in intracellular signaling, apoptosis and metabolic regulation. σ1Rs are intracellular receptors acting as chaperone proteins that modulate Ca2+ signaling through the IP3 receptor. They dynamically translocate inside cells, hence are transmembrane proteins. The σ1R receptor, at the mitochondrial-associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane, is responsible for mitochondrial metabolic regulation and promotes mitochondrial energy depletion and apoptosis. Studies have demonstrated that they play a role as a modulator of ion channels (K+ channels; N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors [NMDAR]; inositol 1,3,5 triphosphate receptors) and regulate lipid transport and metabolism, neuritogenesis, cellular differentiation and myelination in the brain. σ1R modulation of Ca2+ release, modulation of cardiac myocyte contractility and may have links to G-proteins. It has been proposed that σ1Rs are intracellular signal transduction amplifiers. This review of the literature examines the mechanism of action of the σRs, their interaction with neurotransmitters, pharmacology, location and adverse effects mediated through them.
Zucker obese (fa/fa) and lean (Fa/Fa) rats were fed a soy protein diet ad libitum under barrier conditions from 4 wk of age until death. Obese rats were also pair fed with lean controls to prevent hyperphagia. Time of death was determined and tissues collected at necropsy for histologic examination. Lean rats had longer 10th percentile survivorship (males 966 compared with 667 d, females 983 compared with 620 d) and maximum life spans (males 1067 compared with 803 d, females 1163 compared with 744 d) than did obese rats. Preventing hyperphagia increased maximum life span in both males (1010 d) and females (975 d). Pathologies in lean rats were similar to those reported for other rodent strains. For obese rats fed ad libitum, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was the major cause of mortality (males: 91.1%, females: 93.3%). Prevention of hyperphagia decreased deaths attributable to ESRD (males: 64.4%, females: 51.1%). A smaller restriction in energy intake (8-18%) required to prevent hyperphagia compared with the 35-40% in most other studies produced similar increases in longevity, suggesting that obese Zucker rats are particularly sensitive to energy restriction. Amelioration of early onset of renal disease is a likely explanation. Percentage body fat in food-restricted obese rats did not differ from that of animals fed ad libitum; thus, reduced longevity is not the result of obesity per se, but rather is influenced by other metabolic pathologies occurring in this strain of rats homozygous for the fa gene. Because microalbuminuria with progression to ESRD is a complication in human obesity, the Zucker strain offers the opportunity to investigate initiating mechanisms of this pathology.
Objective: The metabolism of arachidonic acid (AA) has been shown to be altered in severe insulin resistance that is present in obese (fa/fa) Zucker rats. We examined the effects and mechanism of action of AA on basal and glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic islets isolated from obese (fa/fa) Zucker rats and their homozygous lean (Fa/Fa) littermates. Research Methods and Procedures: Islets were isolated from 10‐ to 12‐week‐old rats and incubated for 45 minutes in glucose concentrations ranging from 3.3 to 16.7 mM with or without inhibitors of the cyclooxygenase or lipoxygenase pathways. Medium insulin concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay, and islet production of the 12‐lipoxygenase metabolite, 12‐hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (12‐HETE), was measured by enzyme immunoassay. Results: In islets from lean animals, AA stimulated insulin secretion at submaximally stimulatory glucose levels (< 11.1 mM) but not at 16.7 mM glucose. In contrast, in islets derived from obese rats, AA potentiated insulin secretion at all glucose concentrations. AA‐induced insulin secretion was augmented in islets from obese compared with lean rats at high concentrations of AA in the presence of 3.3 mM glucose. Furthermore, the inhibitor of 12‐lipoxygenase, esculetin (0.5 μM), inhibited AA‐stimulated insulin secretion in islets from obese but not lean rats. Finally, the islet production of the 12‐HETE was markedly enhanced in islets from obese rats, both in response to 16.7 mM glucose and to AA. Discussion: The insulin secretory response to AA is augmented in islets from obese Zucker rats by a mechanism related to enhanced activity of the 12‐lipoxygenase pathway. Therefore, augmented action of AA may be a mechanism underlying the adaptation of insulin secretion to the increased demand caused by insulin resistance in these animals.
In both the nephrotic syndrome (NS) and hereditary analbuminemia in the Nagase analbuminemic rat (NAR), the plasma protein concentration is nearly normal since albumin is replaced by several high molecular weight proteins. In rats these include the protease inhibitors alpha 2-macroglobulin (alpha 2M), a 720 kDa positive acute phase protein (APP) and alpha 1-inhibitor 3 (alpha 1-I3), a 180 kDa negative APP. There is no known stimulus to increase alpha 1-I3 synthesis, but like albumin and other negative APPs its synthesis decreases during inflammation by transcriptional down-regulation. In hypoalbuminemic states gene transcription of other positive and negative APPs is increased. We report that alpha 2M was increased significantly (12-fold) in NAR and by approximately 50-fold in rats with NS compared to control. The alpha 1-I3 concentration was twice normal in NAR or NS compared to controls, providing approximately half of the total plasma protein. Infusion of human albumin into NAR to raise albumin levels > 20 mg/ml for 24 hours caused a significant decrease in alpha 1-I3 (24.8 +/- 0.6 to 18.7 +/- 0.6 mg/ml, P < 0.0001), equal in magnitude to that caused by 250 micrograms/100 g of endotoxin (23.0 +/- 1.1 to 18.6 +/- 0.6, P < 0.01). The effect of albumin was not an acute phase response since it also suppressed alpha 2M (239 +/- 10 to 205 +/- 11 micrograms/ml, P < 0.005). Turnover of 125I labeled alpha 2M and alpha 1-I3 was then measured in controls, NAR and in two models of the nephrotic syndrome in rats (Heymann nephritis, HN; adriamycin-induced, ADR), yielding fractional catabolic rates (FCR), which at steady state equals synthesis. The serum alpha 2M concentration was increased approximately equal to 50-fold and was proportional to synthesis (r = 0.91 P < 0.001). alpha 2-Macroglobulin synthesis increased by 12-fold in NAR and 50-fold in NS. In contrast, hepatic alpha 2M mRNA increased only 30% in NAR and twofold in NS, suggesting post-transcriptional regulation. Fractional catabolic rates were not decreased and played no role in increasing serum alpha 2M in NS or NAR. The alpha 1-I3 concentration and synthesis increased twofold from controls in both NAR and NS. However, hepatic alpha 1-I3 mRNA was not increased in NAR and increased only 50% in NS. Unlike alpha 2M, serum alpha 1-I3 correlated negatively with FCR (-r = 0.66, P < 0.01). In conclusion, both alpha 1-13 and alpha 2M concentration are increased in hypooncotic states by increased synthesis regulated post-transcriptionally, supporting plasma protein concentration when albumin is lost in urine or not synthesized.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.