Disease-induced disability may reflect a condition of biological inability to react to acute diseases (i.e., frailty), and should be assessed as a relevant prognostic indicator.
; for the Incremental Diagnostic Value of Amyloid PET With [ 18 F]-Florbetapir (INDIA-FBP) Working Group IMPORTANCE Cerebral amyloidosis is a key abnormality in Alzheimer disease (AD) and can be detected in vivo with positron emission tomography (PET) ligands. Although amyloid PET has clearly demonstrated analytical validity, its clinical utility is debated. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the incremental diagnostic value of amyloid PET with florbetapir F 18 in addition to the routine clinical diagnostic assessment of patients evaluated for cognitive impairment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Incremental Diagnostic Value of Amyloid PET With [ 18 F]-Florbetapir (INDIA-FBP) Study is a multicenter study involving 18 AD evaluation units from eastern Lombardy, Northern Italy, 228 consecutive adults with cognitive impairment were evaluated for AD and other causes of cognitive decline, with a prescan diagnostic confidence of AD between 15% and 85%. Participants underwent routine clinical and instrumental diagnostic assessment. A prescan diagnosis was made, diagnostic confidence was estimated, and drug treatment was provided. At the time of this workup, an amyloid PET/computed tomographic scan was performed, and the result was communicated to physicians after workup completion. Physicians were asked to review the diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and treatment after the scan. The study was conducted from August 5, 2013, to December 31, 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes were prescan to postscan changes of diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and treatment. RESULTS Of the 228 participants, 107 (46%) were male; mean (SD) age was 70.5 (7) years. Diagnostic change occurred in 46 patients (79%) having both a previous diagnosis of AD and an amyloid-negative scan (P < .001) and in 16 (53%) of those with non-AD diagnoses and an amyloid-positive scan (P < .001). Diagnostic confidence in AD diagnosis increased by 15.2% in amyloid-positive (P < .001; effect size Cohen d = 1.04) and decreased by 29.9% in amyloid-negative (P < .001; d = −1.19) scans. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine hydrochloride were introduced in 61 (65.6%) patients with positive scan results who had not previously received those drugs, and the use of the drugs was discontinued in 6 (33.3%) patients with negative scan results who were receiving those drugs (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Amyloid PET in addition to routine assessment in patients with cognitive impairment has a significant effect on diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and drug treatment. The effect on health outcomes, such as morbidity and mortality, remains to be assessed.
The study analyzes the characteristics of 54 nursing home patients (12 male, 42 female; mean age 81.9 ± 7.9 years) with and without the complaint of the fear of falling, and the association of this fear with falling and functional status. Patients who had a fear of falling at baseline (n = 25) had a lower functional status (Barthel Index) score (69.8 ± 22.3 vs. 79.3 ± 15.4), lower scores for balance (8.4 ± 4.4 vs. 10.6 ± 3.7) and gait (Tinetti; 6.7 ± 3.3 vs. 8.3 ± 2.6) and were taking a higher number of psychotropic drugs (0.8 ± 1.1 vs. 0.2 ± 0.5) than those with no fear (n = 29). At 24 months’ follow-up, 25 subjects were still available for evaluation. Fear of falling at baseline was predictive of a decline in activities of daily living, as measured by the Barthel Index, in a multiple regression model, after controlling for baseline cognitive function and change in cognitive function, age, gender, balance and gait, frequency of psychotropic drug usage, and number of chronic symptoms. The findings of this study suggests that, in mobile patients, the fear of falling can be a clinically important predictor of functional decline.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.