Terminating winter cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crops (CCs) 10 or more days before planting corn is recommended to minimize seedling disease and potential yield loss. In Iowa, cold temperatures and frequent precipitation can prevent farmers from following that recommendation and sometimes forcing them to plant corn while the rye plants are still green, referred to as planting green (PG). A field trial was established to evaluate the effect of rye termination shortly before or after corn planting on growth, seedling root disease, and yield of corn. A rye CC was terminated 17 and 3 days before planting (DBP), and 6 and 12 days after planting (DAP) corn; corn planted following no rye was included as a control. Rye biomass, C:N ratio, and N accumulation increased when terminated 6 or 12 DAP corn compared with rye terminated 17 or 3 DBP corn. Corn seedlings were taller from the PG treatments. More radicle root rot was observed when rye was terminated 3 DBP, 6 DAP, and 12 DAP corn than for the 17 DBP treatment and the no-rye control. Generally, greater Pythium Clade B populations were detected on radicles and seminal roots of corn from the PG treatments. Corn populations, ears, or barren plants were not affected by the treatments. In both years, the no-rye control had the greatest corn yield and the 12 DAP treatment had the lowest yield. Our results suggest that PG increased corn seedling root disease and contributed to reduced corn yield.

No abstract

Cool-season cover crops have been shown to reduce soil erosion and nutrient discharge from maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production systems. However, their effects on long-term weed dynamics are not well-understood. We utilized five long-term research trials in Iowa to quantify germinable weed seedbank densities and compositions after 10+ years of cover cropping treatments. All five trials consisted of zero-tillage maize-soybean rotations managed with and without the inclusion of a yearly winter rye (Secale cereal L.) cover crop. Seedbank sampling was conducted in the early spring before crop planting at all locations, with three of the five trials having grown a soybean crop the preceding year, and two a maize crop. Two of the trials (both previously soybean) showed significant and biologically relevant decreases (4,070 and 927 seeds m−2, respectively) in seedbank densities in cover crop treatments compared to controls. In another two trials, one previously maize and one previously soybean, no difference was detected in seedbank densities. In the fifth trial (previously maize), there was a significant, but biologically unimportant increase of 349 seeds m−2. All five trials' weed communities were dominated by common waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.)], and changes in seedbank composition from cover-cropping were driven by changes in this species. Although previous studies have shown that increases in cover crop biomass are strongly correlated with weed suppression, in our study we did not find a relationship between seedbank changes and the mean amount of cover crop biomass produced over a 10-years period (experiment means ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 Mg ha−1 yr−1), the stability of the cover crop biomass production, nor the amount produced going into the previous crop's growing season. We conclude that long-term use of a winter rye cover crop in a maize-soybean system has the potential to meaningfully reduce the size of weed seedbanks compared to winter fallows. However, identifying the mechanisms by which this occurs requires further research into processes such as seed predation and seed decay in cover cropped systems.

Addition of an overwintering cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop (CC) to midwestern maize (Zea mays L.)-based systems offers several environmental benefits, but the long-term effects of this practice on soil hydrological properties are not well understood. We utilized four long-term (10+ yr) trials (two commercial fields, two research plots) in Iowa that included a replicated winter rye CC and no-cover treatment in no-till maize/soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] systems. We took intact 7.62cm diam. soil samples from a 10-to-18-cm depth shortly after cash crop planting in the spring. We measured the soil water retention curve using matric potentials ranging from saturation to -500 cmH 2 O. In addition, we measured organic matter, textural composition, and bulk densities of the soil samples. At the depth sampled, CCs did not meaningfully affect bulk density, water contents at saturation, or air-entry potentials at any trial, nor increase the percentage of macropores. At two trials, soil water content at field capacity (-100 cmH 2 O) in the CC treatments was 2.5 vol% (SE: 1.2%; commercial field) and 2.4 vol% (SE: 1.3%; research plot) higher compared with the no-cover treatments. This increase could meaningfully reduce the amount of water drained from a field after a saturating rain and should be considered when assessing CC impacts on landscape hydrology. The presence or absence of a CC effect on field capacity was not related to CC aboveground biomass production, previous cash crop, or soil texture at the trial sites. Based on our results, a causal model, and previous literature we hypothesize CC root characteristics are key to understanding variable effects of CCs on soil water storage. Our results indicate it is possible for CCs to meaningfully affect soil water storage, but more research is needed on the mechanisms by which these changes occur. INTRODUCTIONAddition of an overwintering cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop (CC) to midwestern maize (Zea mays L.)based systems potentially offers several environmental benefits including reduced soil erosion and nutrient pollution Abbreviations: CC, cover crop.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

No abstract