Danish and non-semantic ANL versions yield results similar to the American English version. The magnitude of the CR indicates that ANL with Danish and non-semantic speech materials is not suitable for prediction of individual patterns of future hearing-aid use or evaluation of individual benefit from hearing-aid features. The ANL with Danish and non-semantic speech materials is not related to IOI-HA outcome.

No abstract

The present study investigates the test-retest reliability of category loudness scaling with pure tones for each of the scaling categories: 'very soft', 'soft', 'OK', 'loud', 'very loud' and 'too loud' at the audiometric frequencies 0.5, 1 kHz, 2 kHz and 4 kHz. Category loudness scaling at two sessions separated by between 1 and 4 weeks was obtained from 16 normal-hearing subjects who all had normal otoscopy, present acoustic reflexes at audiometric frequencies 0.5-4 kHz and middle ear pressure within +/-50 daPa. Intra-subject between-session reliability was found not to be frequency dependent, and comparison with other studies revealed that reliability is not dependent on the applied stimulus signal. Test-retest reliability varied between the different categories: In the categories 'very soft', 'loud', 'very loud' and 'too loud' the test reliability is in the same range as found for hearing thresholds determination, whereas for the 'soft' and 'OK' categories it is poorer. The greater uncertainty for intermediate levels should be considered when using category loudness scaling, e.g. for calculating hearing aid parameters.

Objective: Acceptable Noise Level (ANL) has been established as a method to quantify the acceptance of background noise while listening to speech presented at the most comfortable level. The aim of the present study was to generate Danish, Swedish, and a non-semantic version of the ANL test and investigate normal-hearing Danish and Swedish subjects' performance on these tests. Design: ANL was measured using Danish and Swedish running speech with two different noises: Speech-weighted amplitude-modulated noise and multitalker speech babble. ANL was also measured using the non-semantic International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) as speech signal together with the speech-weighted amplitudemodulated noise. The latter condition was identical in both populations. Study Sample: Forty Danish and 40 Swedish normal-hearing subjects. Results: In both populations ANL results were similar to previously reported results from American studies. Generally, significant differences were seen between test conditions using different types of noise within ears in each population. Significant differences were seen for ANL across populations, also when the non-semantic ISTS was used as speech signal. Conclusions: The present findings indicate that there are extrinsic factors, such as instructions, affecting the ANL results.

67% of the subjects opted for permanent use of the Ponto Pro, which, compared to the BP100, was rated to have a nicer look, to be easier to operate, and to yield better speech intelligibility.