The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2012.692822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users

Abstract: Danish and non-semantic ANL versions yield results similar to the American English version. The magnitude of the CR indicates that ANL with Danish and non-semantic speech materials is not suitable for prediction of individual patterns of future hearing-aid use or evaluation of individual benefit from hearing-aid features. The ANL with Danish and non-semantic speech materials is not related to IOI-HA outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(79 reference statements)
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, in Olsen et al (2012) ANL was measured monaurally and listeners themselves used audiometer attenuators to adjust the signal level. It is possible that in the study by Olsen et al (2012) the effect of these factors obscured the weak association between ANL and hearing-aid success. More research is needed in order to clarify these issues.…”
Section: Anl and Hearing-aid Successmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, in Olsen et al (2012) ANL was measured monaurally and listeners themselves used audiometer attenuators to adjust the signal level. It is possible that in the study by Olsen et al (2012) the effect of these factors obscured the weak association between ANL and hearing-aid success. More research is needed in order to clarify these issues.…”
Section: Anl and Hearing-aid Successmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The signifi cant but not strong association between ANL and hearing-aid success may help explain the non-signifi cant fi nding by Olsen et al (2012). Specifi cally, ANL has been shown to be highly sensitive to instruction translation/interpretation (Ho et al, 2012).…”
Section: Anl and Hearing-aid Successmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ANL ' s prediction accuracy in this context is as high as 85% (Nabelek et al, 2006). However, a recent research (Olsen et al, 2012) was unable to demonstrate the relationship between ANL and hearing-aid outcome. In addition to hearingaid outcome, ANL has been shown to predict cochlear implant users ' perceived communication ability (Donaldson et al, 2009) and satisfaction (Plyler et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%