Abstract:Danish and non-semantic ANL versions yield results similar to the American English version. The magnitude of the CR indicates that ANL with Danish and non-semantic speech materials is not suitable for prediction of individual patterns of future hearing-aid use or evaluation of individual benefit from hearing-aid features. The ANL with Danish and non-semantic speech materials is not related to IOI-HA outcome.
“…In contrast, in Olsen et al (2012) ANL was measured monaurally and listeners themselves used audiometer attenuators to adjust the signal level. It is possible that in the study by Olsen et al (2012) the effect of these factors obscured the weak association between ANL and hearing-aid success. More research is needed in order to clarify these issues.…”
Section: Anl and Hearing-aid Successmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The signifi cant but not strong association between ANL and hearing-aid success may help explain the non-signifi cant fi nding by Olsen et al (2012). Specifi cally, ANL has been shown to be highly sensitive to instruction translation/interpretation (Ho et al, 2012).…”
Section: Anl and Hearing-aid Successmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, most previous studies used a cross-section or retrospective design (e.g. Nabelek et al, 2006;Olsen et al, 2012;Schwartz & Cox, 2012). That is, in a given test session, participants completed the ANL test and used questionnaires to describe their current and/or previous experience with hearing aids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olsen et al (2012) recruited 63 established hearing-aid wearers. The unaided ANLs were measured monaurally using earphones.…”
The current study suggested the possibility of using ANL to predict hearing-aid success. However, the usefulness of ANL as a clinical tool is unlikely to be as great as indicated by the literature.
“…In contrast, in Olsen et al (2012) ANL was measured monaurally and listeners themselves used audiometer attenuators to adjust the signal level. It is possible that in the study by Olsen et al (2012) the effect of these factors obscured the weak association between ANL and hearing-aid success. More research is needed in order to clarify these issues.…”
Section: Anl and Hearing-aid Successmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The signifi cant but not strong association between ANL and hearing-aid success may help explain the non-signifi cant fi nding by Olsen et al (2012). Specifi cally, ANL has been shown to be highly sensitive to instruction translation/interpretation (Ho et al, 2012).…”
Section: Anl and Hearing-aid Successmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, most previous studies used a cross-section or retrospective design (e.g. Nabelek et al, 2006;Olsen et al, 2012;Schwartz & Cox, 2012). That is, in a given test session, participants completed the ANL test and used questionnaires to describe their current and/or previous experience with hearing aids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olsen et al (2012) recruited 63 established hearing-aid wearers. The unaided ANLs were measured monaurally using earphones.…”
The current study suggested the possibility of using ANL to predict hearing-aid success. However, the usefulness of ANL as a clinical tool is unlikely to be as great as indicated by the literature.
“…The ANL ' s prediction accuracy in this context is as high as 85% (Nabelek et al, 2006). However, a recent research (Olsen et al, 2012) was unable to demonstrate the relationship between ANL and hearing-aid outcome. In addition to hearingaid outcome, ANL has been shown to predict cochlear implant users ' perceived communication ability (Donaldson et al, 2009) and satisfaction (Plyler et al, 2008).…”
The results suggested the possibility of directly comparing ANL measures carried out in different countries using different languages. However, it remains unclear if the ISTS can serve as an international ANL stimulus.
Older adults often find it difficult to perceive speech, especially in noisy conditions. Though hearing aid is one of the rehabilitative devices available to older adults to alleviate hearing loss, some of them may experience annoyance through hearing aid and hence reject it, may be due to circuitry noise and/or background noise. Acceptable noise level is a direct behavioural measure to estimate the extent of how much a person is able to put up with noise while simultaneously listening to speech. Acceptable noise level is a central auditory measure and it is not influenced by age, gender, presentation level or speaker. Using this measure, we can quantify the annoyance level experienced by an individual. This information is of utmost importance and caution should be paid before setting the parameters in hearing aid, especially for those who are unable to accept noise. In this review article, an attempt has been made to document how to optimize the hearing aid program by setting parameters such as noise reduction circuit, microphone sensitivity and gain. These adjustments of parameters might help to reduce rejection rate of hearing aids, especially in those individuals who are annoyed by background noise.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.