Detecting and assessing hydrocarbon reservoirs without the need to drill test wells is of major importance to the petroleum industry. Seismic methods have traditionally been used in this context, but the results can be ambiguous. Another approach is to use electromagnetic sounding methods that exploit the resistivity differences between a reservoir containing highly resistive hydrocarbons and one saturated with conductive saline fluids. Modeling presented by Eidesmo et al. (2002) demonstrates that by using seabed logging (SBL), a special application of frequency domain controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) sounding, the existence or otherwise of hydrocarbon bearing layers can be determined and their lateral extent and boundaries can be quantified. Such information provides valuable complementary constraints on reservoir geometry and characteristics obtained by seismic surveying. In November 2000, a full-scale trial survey was carried out from the research ship RRS Charles Darwin offshore Angola, in an area with proven hydrocarbon reserves. The project was a collaboration among Statoil, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, and the Southampton Oceanography Centre. The object was to demonstrate that SBL, developed by Statoil (Eidesmo et al., 2000; Ellingsrud et al., 2001), could direct detect hydrocarbon-filled layers in the subseafloor. The petroleum prospects offshore Angola are in a deep Tertiary basin consisting of a thick (10-20 km) sequence of prograding sands and shales. The area is characterized by allochthonous salt of Aptian age, and deepwater channel sands with petroleum potential. Well logs show sediment resistivities typically around 0.7 Ωm that rise to around 100 Ωm in petroleum reservoirs. The survey site was on the continental slope in water depths of about 1200 m, with a known petroleum reservoir about 1100 m below seafloor. Shallow salt occurs in the northeast corner of the area.
The SW Ecuador‐NW Peru forearc region is the southernmost location, where the Caribbean large igneous province (CLIP) interacted with the South American margin since the Late Cretaceous. The accretion of the CLIP to the margin led to the entrapment of the North Andean crustal Sliver, conforming the underlying basement of the forearc region in Ecuador, whereas in NW Peru, forearc depocenters involve rocks of continental affinity. Many existing tectonic reconstructions have treated these two areas independently, largely based on their crustal affinities. In contrast, this study integrates previous studies into an analysis of unpublished seismic profiles, potential field data, outcrop stratigraphy, and recent studies dealing with the dynamics of allochthonous terrane accretion along continental margins. Our integrated approach shows that SW Ecuador was dominated by a Late Cretaceous deforming outer wedge, which may have constituted a remnant of a northeast or northwest dipping obliquely obducted oceanic block at the edge of the CLIP. This tectonic phase was governed by plate instability, affecting NW Peru and SW Ecuador, followed by reestablishment of the margin by early Eocene. The resulting margin configuration and the spatial distribution of the different tectonic elements seem to have played a key role into the further Cenozoic development of the forearc region. The model presented in this study proposes that the accretion of buoyant oceanic terranes may have had a profound impact on the early margin configuration of SW Ecuador and NW Peru and led to the development of localized but genetically related forearc depocenters.
High-quality 3D seismic data are used to analyze the history of fault growth and hydrocarbon leakage in the Snøhvit Field, southwestern Barents Sea. The aim of this work is to evaluate the role of tectonic fracturing as a mechanism driving fluid-flow in the study area. To achieve this aim, an integrated approach including seismic interpretation, multiple seismic attribute analysis, fault modeling and displacement analysis was used.The six major faults in the study area are dip-slip normal faults which are characterized by complex lateral and vertical segmentation. The three main episodes of fault reactivation interpreted were in late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian), early Cretaceous and Paleocene times. Fault reactivation in the study area is mainly through dip-linkage. Throw-distance plots of the representative faults also revealed along-strike linkage and multi-skewed C-type profiles. The throw profiles show that faults in the study area evolved through polycyclic activity involving both blind propagation, syn-sedimentary activity and that they have their maximum displacement at the reservoir zone. The expansion and growth indices provide evidence for coeval fault activity with sedimentation and interaction of the faults with a free surface during their evolution.
Summary
Insights into the spreading evolution of the Knipovich Ridge and development of the Fram Strait are revealed from a recent aeromagnetic survey. As an ultra-slow spreading ridge in an oblique system located between the Svalbard—Barents Sea and the Northeast Greenland rifted margins, the dynamics of the Knipovich Ridge opening has long been debated. Its 90-degree bend with the Mohns Ridge, rare in plate tectonics, affects the evolution of the Fram Strait and motivates the study of crustal deformation with this distinctive configuration. We identified magnetic isochrons on either side of the present-day Knipovich Ridge. These magnetic observations considerably reduce the mapped extent of the oceanic domain and question the present understanding of the conjugate rifted margins. Our analysis reveals a failed spreading system before a major spreading reorganization of the Fram Strait gateway around magnetic chron C6 (circa 20 Ma).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.