CorrectionsBIOCHEMISTRY. For the article ''Interaction of RNA polymerase with forked DNA: Evidence for two kinetically significant intermediates on the pathway to the final complex,'' by Laura Tsujikawa, Oleg V. Tsodikov, and Pieter L. deHaseth, which appeared in number 6, March 19, 2002, of Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (99, 3493-3498; First Published March 12, 2002; 10.1073͞ pnas.062487299), the authors note the following concerning RNA polymerase (RNAP) concentrations. No correction was made for the fraction of RNAP (0.5) that is active in promoter binding. With this correction, the values of K 1 and K app (but not K f ) would increase by about a factor of 2. The relative values would remain essentially unchanged. Also, the legends to Figs. 2, 3, and 5 contain errors pertaining to the symbols used for data obtained with and without heparin challenge, the duration of the challenge, and the concentration of added heparin. The figures and the corrected legends appear below. Fig. 2. Determination of equilibrium affinities by titration of wt Fork with RNAP. The reactions contained 1 nM wt Fork and variable amounts of RNAP as shown and were analyzed by electrophoretic mobility shift immediately (OE; data shown are averages of three independent experiments) or after a challenge with 100 g͞ml heparin for 10 min (F; data shown are averages of four independent experiments). The curves shown reflect the simultaneous errorweighted fits of the data to Eqs. 3 and 4 -7. The parameters are shown in Table 1 (line 1). www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.013667699 Fig. 3. Kinetics of complex formation. RNAP (65 nM) and wt forked DNA (1 nM) were incubated for various time intervals and then complex formation was determined immediately (Ϫheparin) or after a 2-min challenge with 100 g͞ml heparin (ϩheparin). The Ϫheparin data (s) were fit (error-weighted) with Eq. 8 with a 2 ϭ 0 (kaϪ ϭ 0.10 Ϯ 0.01 s Ϫ1 ) and the ϩheparin data (OE) with both single (k aϩ ϭ 0.036 Ϯ 0.004 s Ϫ1 ; thin line) and double-exponential (ka 1 ϭ 0.044 Ϯ 0.002 s Ϫ1 ; ka 2 ϭ (5 Ϯ 3) ϫ 10 Ϫ4 s Ϫ1 ; thick line) equations. Fig. 5.Comparison of the kinetics for formation and dissociation of competitor-resistant complexes between RNAP and wt Fork. Association data were obtained as described in the text and the legend for Fig. 3 except the concentration of forked DNA was 10 nM. Dissociation kinetics were obtained by challenging with 100 g͞ml heparin a mixture of RNAP and forked DNA that had been incubated for 30 min. The curves represent double-exponential fits of the data to Eq. 10. (A) wt RNAP. The observed association rate constants (s) are shown in the legend for Fig. 3; for the slow phase of the dissociation of the wt Fork-wt RNAP complex (F), kd 2 ϭ (1.3 Ϯ 0.2) ϫ 10 Ϫ4 s Ϫ1 . (B) YYW RNAP. The slow phase of the association reaction (F) has a ka 2 ϭ (1.1 Ϯ 0.3) ϫ 10 Ϫ3 s Ϫ1 ; the slow phase of the dissociation reaction (s), a kd 2 ϭ (6 Ϯ 1) ϫ 10 Ϫ4 s Ϫ1 . Fig. 6. BCL-6 preferentially binds to the wild-type exon 1 in Ly1 cells. Both Ly1 and the control Ly7 cells wer...

A continuous array of overlapping clones covering the entire human chromosome 21q was constructed from human yeast artificial chromosome libraries using sequence-tagged sites as landmarks specifically detected by polymerase chain reaction. The yeast artificial chromosome contiguous unit starts with pericentromeric and ends with subtelomeric loci of 21q. The resulting order of sequence-tagged sites is consistent with other physical and genetic mapping data. This set of overlapping clones will promote our knowledge of the structure of this chromosome and the function of its genes.

A new approach for the isolation of chromosome-specific subsets from a human genomic yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) library is described. It is based on the hybridization with an Alu polymerase chain reaction (PCR) probe. We screened a 1.5 genome equivalent YAC library of megabase insert size with Alu PCR products amplified from hybrid cell lines containing human chromosome 21, and identified a subset of 63 clones representative of this chromosome. The majority of clones were assigned to chromosome 21 by the presence of specific STSs and in situ hybridization. Twenty-nine of 36 STSs that we tested were detected in the subset, and a contig spanning 20 centimorgans in the genetic map and containing 8 STSs in 4 YACs was identified. The proposed approach can greatly speed efforts to construct physical maps of the human genome.

Expansion of polymorphic CAG and CTG repeats in transcripts is the cause of six inherited neurodegenerative or neuromuscular diseases and may be involved in several other genetic disorders of the central nervous system. To identify new candidate genes, we have undertaken a large-scale screening project for CAG and CTG repeats in human reference cDNAs. We screened 100 128 brain cDNAs by hybridization. We also scanned GenBank expressed sequence tags for the presence of long CAG/CTG repeats in the extremities of cDNAs from several human tissues. Of the selected clones, 286 were found to represent new genes, and 72 have thus far been shown to contain CAG/CTG repeats. Our data indicate that CAG/CTG repeated 10 or more times are more likely to be polymorphic, and that new 3'-directed cDNAs with such repeats are very rare (1/2862). Nine new cDNAs containing polymorphic (observed heterozygote frequency: 0.05-0.90) CAG/CTG repeats have been currently identified in cDNAs. All of the cDNAs have been assigned to chromosomes, and six of them could be mapped with YACs to 1q32-q41, 3p14, 4q28, 3p21 and 12q13.3, 13q13.1-q13.2, and 19q13.43. Three of these clones are highly polymorphic and represent the most likely candidate genes for inherited neurodegenerative diseases and, perhaps, neuropsychiatric disorders of multifactorial origin.

CorrectionsBIOCHEMISTRY. For the article ''Interaction of RNA polymerase with forked DNA: Evidence for two kinetically significant intermediates on the pathway to the final complex,'' by Laura Tsujikawa, Oleg V. Tsodikov, and Pieter L. deHaseth, which appeared in number 6, March 19, 2002, of Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (99, 3493-3498; First Published March 12, 2002; 10.1073͞ pnas.062487299), the authors note the following concerning RNA polymerase (RNAP) concentrations. No correction was made for the fraction of RNAP (0.5) that is active in promoter binding. With this correction, the values of K 1 and K app (but not K f ) would increase by about a factor of 2. The relative values would remain essentially unchanged. Also, the legends to Figs. 2, 3, and 5 contain errors pertaining to the symbols used for data obtained with and without heparin challenge, the duration of the challenge, and the concentration of added heparin. The figures and the corrected legends appear below. Fig. 2. Determination of equilibrium affinities by titration of wt Fork with RNAP. The reactions contained 1 nM wt Fork and variable amounts of RNAP as shown and were analyzed by electrophoretic mobility shift immediately (OE; data shown are averages of three independent experiments) or after a challenge with 100 g͞ml heparin for 10 min (F; data shown are averages of four independent experiments). The curves shown reflect the simultaneous errorweighted fits of the data to Eqs. 3 and 4 -7. The parameters are shown in Table 1 (line 1).www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.013667699 Fig. 3. Kinetics of complex formation. RNAP (65 nM) and wt forked DNA (1 nM) were incubated for various time intervals and then complex formation was determined immediately (Ϫheparin) or after a 2-min challenge with 100 g͞ml heparin (ϩheparin). The Ϫheparin data (s) were fit (error-weighted) with Eq. 8 with a 2 ϭ 0 (kaϪ ϭ 0.10 Ϯ 0.01 s Ϫ1 ) and the ϩheparin data (OE) with both single (k aϩ ϭ 0.036 Ϯ 0.004 s Ϫ1 ; thin line) and double-exponential (ka 1 ϭ 0.044 Ϯ 0.002 s Ϫ1 ; ka 2 ϭ (5 Ϯ 3) ϫ 10 Ϫ4 s Ϫ1 ; thick line) equations. Fig. 5.Comparison of the kinetics for formation and dissociation of competitor-resistant complexes between RNAP and wt Fork. Association data were obtained as described in the text and the legend for Fig. 3 except the concentration of forked DNA was 10 nM. Dissociation kinetics were obtained by challenging with 100 g͞ml heparin a mixture of RNAP and forked DNA that had been incubated for 30 min. The curves represent double-exponential fits of the data to Eq. 10. (A) wt RNAP. The observed association rate constants (s) are shown in the legend for Fig. 3; for the slow phase of the dissociation of the wt Fork-wt RNAP complex (F), kd 2 ϭ (1.3 Ϯ 0.2) ϫ 10 Ϫ4 s Ϫ1 . (B) YYW RNAP. The slow phase of the association reaction (F) has a ka 2 ϭ (1.1 Ϯ 0.3) ϫ 10 Ϫ3 s Ϫ1 ; the slow phase of the dissociation reaction (s), a kd 2 ϭ (6 Ϯ 1) ϫ 10 Ϫ4 s Ϫ1 . 4 should have appeared in color. In addition, the marker for the Ub band of Fig. 6A should be 14. The corrected...