Hermetic sealing is important regarding functionality and reliability for MEMS components. Typically this sealing is done at the wafer level using wafer bonding, which simultaneously also provides mechanical protective caps. An existing test structure for inner cavity pressure measurement, utilizing the pressure dependence of heat transfer in gasses, is used for detailed investigations of factors, which influence the inner cavity pressure in the wafer pre-processing and wafer bonding step itself. These investigations ultimately allowed optimized wafer processing, improved process control and reliability investigation.
Technologies for the 3D integration are described within this paper with respect to devices that have to retain a specific minimum wafer thickness for handling purposes (CMOS) and integrity of mechanical elements (MEMS). This implies Through-Silicon Vias (TSVs) with large dimensions and high aspect ratios (HAR). Moreover, as a main objective, the aspired TSV technology had to be universal and scalable with the designated utilization in a MEMS/CMOS foundry. Two TSV approaches are investigated and discussed, in which the TSVs were fabricated either before or after wafer thinning. One distinctive feature is an incomplete TSV Cu-filling, which avoids long processing and complex process control, while minimizing the thermomechanical stress between Cu and Si and related adverse effects in the device. However, the incomplete filling also includes various challenges regarding process integration. A method based on pattern plating is described, in which TSVs are metalized at the same time as the redistribution layer and which eliminates the need for additional planarization and patterning steps. For MEMS, the realization of a protective hermetically sealed capping is crucial, which is addressed in this paper by glass frit wafer level bonding and is discussed for hermetic sealing of MEMS inertial sensors. The TSV based 3D integration technologies are demonstrated on CMOS like test vehicle and on a MEMS device fabricated in Air Gap Insulated Microstructure (AIM) technology
Wafer bonding is an important process step in microsystem technologies for processing engineered substrates and for capping. Usually, the work and literature are focused on the bonding of the main wafer area. However, in recent years MEMS technologies have become more complex, with more process steps after wafer bonding. Accordingly, the wafer edge is becoming more and more important, and must be engineered. Methods for realizing this are discussed in this paper.
Semiconductor Wafer Bonding is a key process step for many technologies such as engineered substrates (SOI and cavity SOI Wafers) MEMS (sensors, microfluidics), 3D integration (device stacking) and wafer thinning (temporary wafer bonding). Almost all publications in the field of wafer bonding are concerned with how bonding is working and can be performed at the actual wafer area. It is also well known that any disturbances on the wafer surface, such as particles, scratches, areas with increased surface roughness, or steps from the wafer processing act in most of the wafer bonding technologies as points of discontinuities with negative influences on the bonding behavior (generation of voids, non-hermeticity, reduced bonding strength). Due to the general geometry of the wafers and their defined sizes they have an edge. This wafer edge has special properties and also acts as an area of discontinuities. Even in well-established wafer bonding techniques, which allow close to perfect bonding of the wafer area, at the wafer edge there are smaller or wider unbonded areas. In particular, in industrial production processes, these unbonded areas are often the cause of process problems in the process steps after wafer bonding. For example, wet chemicals can be tapped in such unbonded areas and become released later into other tools, parts of the poorly bonded wafer edge can flake off, and in the grinding process wafers can break due to missing mechanical support at unbonded edge areas. The reasons for these unbonded areas can originate in different process areas such as the raw wafer manufacturing (here the wafer edge is initially defined), in the wafer processing before bonding (for every process step the wafer edge is a zone of discontinuities with special effects and inhomogeneities), in the bonding process (here the bonding needs to be formed until the very edge of the wafer) and in the process steps after the wafer bonding (bonded wafer edges can be easily damaged). In the proposed paper the influence of wafer edge effects on different wafer bonding technologies, such as direct, anodic and glass frit bonding, will be discussed, and improvements will be described. In this abstract, only one short example will be given: Semiconductor wafer bonding is used to process cavity SOI-Wafers to allow the advantageous production of absolute pressure sensors. Here, two kinds of wafers, which later become the pressure sensor membrane by grinding and polishing, have to be bonded to a carrier wafer containing etched cavities. For discrete pressure sensors, the use of bulk wafers is sufficient for the membrane, but due to the edge roll-off, a very slight transition from the actual wafer edge to the actual wafer area, some unbonded areas occur at the wafer edge, which disturb the subsequent processing (chemical trapping, flaking). For CMOS integrated pressure sensors, epi-wafers need to be used as membrane wafers. These epi wafers often have a so-called epi crown, a ridge at the wafer edge resulting from the growth of the epitaxial layer. This epi crown, over a wide area, prevents both wafers from coming into the required close contact to form the direct bond. This results in a poor bonding yield, and the wafers often cannot even be processed further on production tools. To allow bonding up to the wafer edge, special unsymmetrical edge geometries with reduced edge roll off, can be used for the bulk wafers [1]. To engineer the bonded wafer edge in advance, the wafer edge can be lowered in a defined way before the direct bonding by masking and silicon etching processes, to produce a very clean, well bonded wafer edge after grinding and polishing of the membrane wafer [2]. This preparation process removes the epi crown, thus allowing a very good bonding yield when bonding epi-wafers. It can be also used for bulk wafers to obtain a very defined wafer edge (see figure 1). It can be concluded that the wafer edge is a zone of discontinuities causing problems during wafer bonding. If the bonding problems at the edge are understood, they can be solved efficiently by suitable countermeasures. References: [1] R. Knechtel, A. Lenz: DE000010355728B4 Verbinden von Halbleiterscheiben gleichen Durchmessers zum Erhalt einer gebondeten Scheibenanordnung [2] R. Knechtel, U. Schwarz: DE102007025649B4 Verfahren zum Übertragen einer Epitaxie-Schicht von einer Spender- auf eine Systemscheibe der Mikrosystemtechnik Figure 1
Glass frit wafer bonding remains a very attractive process for industrial applications. The main benefit is that the glass frit is an active bonding layer, which planarizes surface roughness and topography up to the direct sealing of metal lines at the bonding interface. This allows very simple process integration. The bonding yield and bonding strength are high, while the bonding interface is reliable regarding mechanical degradation and hermeticity. The processing costs for screen printing, thermal conditioning (firing) of the printed glass paste to a solid glass are moderate, but no extra costs arise from any specially-required preparations of the electrical connecting metallization (no passivation or planarization is needed). In this publication detailed investigations and optimizations of bond process parameters regarding stable and low inner pressure of cavities sealed by glass fit bonding, considering the mechanical bonding strength and bonding behavior, are described.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.