Objective: Guidelines adherence in emergency departments (EDs) relies partly on the availability of resources to improve sepsis care and outcomes. Our objective was to assess the management of pediatric septic shock (PSS) in Latin America's EDs and to determine the impact of treatment coordinated by a pediatric emergency specialist (PEMS) versus nonpediatric emergency specialists (NPEMS) on guidelines adherence.Methods: Prospective, descriptive, and multicenter study using an electronic survey administered to PEMS and NPEMS who treat PSS in EDs in 14 Latin American countries. Results:We distributed 2164 surveys with a response rate of 41.5%, of which 22.5% were PEMS. Overall American College of Critical Care Medicine reported guidelines adherence was as follows: vascular access obtained in 5 minutes, 76%; fluid infusion technique, 60%; administering 40 to 60 mL/kg within 30 minutes, 32%; inotropic infusion by peripheral route, 61%; dopamine or epinephrine in cold shock, 80%; norepinephrine in warm shock, 57%; and antibiotics within 60 minutes, 82%. Between PEMS and NPEMS, the following differences were found: vascular access in 5 minutes, 87.1% versus 72.7% (P < 0.01); fluid infusion technique, 72.3% versus 55.9% (P < 0.01); administering 40 to 60 mL/kg within 30 minutes, 42% versus 29% (P < 0.01); inotropic infusion by peripheral route, 75.7% versus 56.3% (P < 0.01); dopamine or epinephrine in cold shock, 87.1% versus 77.3% (P < 0.05); norepinephrine in warm shock, 67.8% versus 54% (P < 0.01); and antibiotic administration within first 60 minutes, 90.1% versus 79.3% (P < 0.01), respectively. Good adherence criteria were followed by 24%. The main referred barrier for sepsis care was a failure in its recognition, including the lack of triage tools. Conclusions:In some Latin American countries, there is variability in self-reported adherence to the evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of PSS during the first hour. The coordination by PEMS support greater adherence to these recommendations.
El transporte del paciente pediátrico en estado crítico en tiempos de COVID 19 representa un desafío, especialmente en un entorno de recursos limitados. Es posible que los hospitales regionales en muchas partes del mundo no estén completamente equipados para tratar a niños con necesidades médicas complejas y en casos de infección por coronavirus. En muchos casos, los equipos de transporte deben tomar decisiones complejas durante todo el proceso, desde la llamada inicial al hospital receptor y la atención del paciente. Los niños en un entorno de recursos limitados tienen un mayor riesgo de eventos adversos y deterioro clínico. El objetivo de este documento es estandarizar aspectos relacionados con el transporte de pacientes sospechosos / confirmados de COVID-19, a fin de reducir el riesgo de transmisión durante el proceso, proteger al personal de salud, evitar el deterioro fisiológico de los pacientes durante el transporte y el posterior contagio de otros pacientes que puedan ser trasladados en la ambulancia. Correspondencia: Adriana Yock-Corrales Correo: adriyock@gmail.com Conflicto de interés: Los autores declaran no poseer conflicto de interés. Recibido: 21/05/2020 Aceptado:5/06/2020
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.