Background:The concept of generic prescription is widely accepted in various parts of the world. Nevertheless, it has failed to gain popularity in India due to factors such as nonavailability and distrust on the product quality. However, since 2012, the Government of West Bengal, India, has initiated exclusive generic drug outlets called “fair price medicine shop” (FPMS) inside the government hospital premises in a “public-private-partnership” model. This study was undertaken to evaluate the experience and attitude of patients who were consuming generic drugs purchased from these FPMS.Materials and Methods:It was a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study where we have interviewed 100 patients each consuming generic and branded drugs, respectively. The perceived effectiveness, reported safety, medication adherence, cost of therapy, and availability of drugs was compared between two mentioned groups. Medication adherence was estimated through Drug Attitude Inventory-10.Results:93% of generic and 87% branded drug users believed that their drugs were effective (P = 0.238) in controlling their ailments. No significant difference (9% generic, 10% branded drug users, P = 1.000) was observed in reported adverse effects between generic and branded drug users. 82% and 77% of patients were adherent generic and branded drugs, respectively (P = 0.289). As expected, a significantly lower cost of generic drugs was observed compared to its branded counterpart.Conclusion:The policy of FPMS implemented by the Government of West Bengal, India appeared to be promising in terms of perceived effectiveness, safety, and adherence of generic drugs from FPMS compared to drugs purchased from open market retailers. Therefore, this study might act as an impetus for the policy-makers to initiate similar models across the country.
Background: Oral antibiotics are frequently used for acne vulgaris. Cephalexin has documented some success against acne vulgaris in earlier studies. Here the efficacy and safety of Cephalexin have been compared against the standard therapy of Doxycyline.Methods: From September 2010 to June 2011, 100 patients of moderate Acne vulgaris were randomized into two groups to receive oral Doxycyline (100mg once daily) or Cephalexin (500mg thrice daily) in an open label manner for eight weeks. All participants were allowed to use topical 5%Benzoyl peroxide gel twice daily. Efficacy was measured in terms of reduction in the number of facial comedones and inflammatory lesions from baseline after eight weeks.Results: 44 patients from Cephalexin group and48 patients from Doxycyline group completed the study. Both drugs have significantly decreased comedone count as well as the inflammatory lesion count after eight weeks. However, Doxycycline appeared better in terms of Comedone count (14.5±3.07 versus 12.9±4.31, p=0.045) as well as inflammatory lesion count (8.64.1±2.14 versus 7.67±2.46, p=0.047) at the end. The total adverse event was slightly more with Cephalexin (6.81% versus 6.25%, p= 0.912), where Diarrhoea remained the commonest adverse effect (4.54%).Conclusions: Although for the first time oral Cephalexin has displayed efficacy against moderate acne vulgaris in a prospective clinical study, it appeared inferior to Doxycycline over eight weeks. Therefore, it becomes an option only when other oral antibiotics are contraindicated or not tolerated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.