We reveal the insignificance of advanced materials in further enhancing the energy efficiency of desalination and suggest more impactful approaches.

In recent years, the development of nanopore-based membranes has revitalized the prospect of harvesting salinity gradient (blue) energy. In this study, we systematically analyze the energetic performance of nanopore-based power generation (NPG) at various process scales, beginning with a single nanopore, followed by a multipore membrane coupon, and ending with a full-scale system. We confirm the high power densities attainable by a single nanopore and demonstrate that, at the coupon scale and above, concentration polarization severely hinders the power density of NPG, revealing the common, yet significant, error in linearly extrapolating single-pore performance to multipore membranes. Through our consideration of concentration polarization, we also importantly show that the development of materials with exceptional nanopore properties provides limited enhancement of practical process performance. For a full-scale NPG membrane module, we find an inherent tradeoff between power density and thermodynamic energy efficiency, whereby achieving a high power density sacrifices the energy efficiency. Furthermore, we derive a simple expression for the theoretical maximum energy efficiency of NPG, showing it is solely related to the membrane selectivity (i.e., S 2/2). Through this relation, it is apparent that the energy efficiency of NPG is limited to only 50% (for a completely selective membrane, i.e., S = 1), reinforcing our optimistic full-scale simulations which result in a (practical) maximum energy efficiency of 42%. Finally, we assess the net extractable energy of a full-scale NPG system which mixes river water and seawater by including the energy losses from pretreatment and pumping, revealing that the NPG processboth in its current state of development and in the case of highly optimistic performance with minimized external energy lossesis not viable for power generation.

No abstract

Electro-driven technologies are viewed as a potential alternative to the current state-of-the-art technology, reverse osmosis, for the desalination of brackish waters. Capacitive deionization (CDI), based on the principle of electrosorption, has been intensively researched under the premise of being energy efficient. However, electrodialysis (ED), despite being a more mature electro-driven technology, has yet to be extensively compared to CDI in terms of energetic performance. In this study, we utilize Nernst−Planck based models for continuous flow ED and constant-current membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) to systematically evaluate the energy consumption of the two processes. By ensuring equivalently sized ED and MCDI systemsin addition to using the same feed salinity, salt removal, water recovery, and productivity across the two technologiesenergy consumption is appropriately compared. We find that ED consumes less energy (has higher energy efficiency) than MCDI for all investigated conditions. Notably, our results indicate that the performance gap between ED and MCDI is substantial for typical brackish water desalination conditions (e.g., 3 g L −1 feed salinity, 0.5 g L −1 product water, 80% water recovery, and 15 L m −2 h −1 productivity), with the energy efficiency of ED often exceeding 30% and being nearly an order of magnitude greater than MCDI. We provide further insights into the inherent limitations of each technology by comparing their respective components of energy consumption, and explain why MCDI is unable to attain the performance of ED, even with ideal and optimized operation.

Though electrodialysis (ED) and reverse osmosis (RO) are both mature, proven technologies for brackish water desalination, RO is currently utilized to desalinate over an order of magnitude more brackish water than ED. This large discrepancy in the adoption of each technology has yet to be thoroughly justified in the literature, particularly from the perspective of energy consumption. Hence, in this study, we performed a direct and systematic comparison of the energy consumption of RO and ED for brackish water desalination, precisely mapping out the ideal operational space of each technology for the first time. Using rigorous system-scale models for RO and ED, we determine the specific energy consumption and energy efficiency of each process over a wide range of brackish water conditions. Specifically, we investigate the effects of varying feed salinity, extent of salt removal, water recovery, and productivity to ultimately identify the operational sweet spots of each technology. By maintaining the same separation parameters (i.e., feed salinity, salt removal, water recovery) and productivity between RO and ED throughout the study, we ensure that our comparison of the technologies is valid and fair. Our results indicate that both RO and ED are capable of operating with high energy efficiency (>30%) for brackish water desalination, though for differing conditions. Particularly, we show that whereas ED excels for low feed salinities (<3 g L −1 ) and extents of salt removal, RO operates optimally for high salinity feeds (>5 g L −1 ), which require more extensive desalination. Through our in-depth energetic analysis, we provide guidance for future applications of RO and ED, emphasizing that increased implementation of ED will require significant reduction in the cost of ion-exchange membranes.