Objective: This study aims to describe the condition of Fournier’s gangrene in Dr. Soetomo General Hospital from January 2014 to December 2020. Material and methods: This study used a retrospective analytic design, by taking data through medical records at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital from January 2014 to December 2020. This study used total sampling with recorded data: age, gender, length of stay, outcome, location, comorbidities, causes, management, culture results, and Fournier’s gangrene severity index (FGSI) score. Result: Of the 135 subjects collected, it was found that 55.56% were individuals over 50 years of age. About 91.11% were male patients, with some sites being in the scrotum 50.37%. Only 25.19% of patients had no comorbids, while the rest had a history of CKD, hypertension, diabetes, or a combination of these diseases. Bacterial cultures obtained were mostly caused by the Enterobacteriaceae bacteria group (32.59%). Of the subjects we studied who experienced mortality, it was found that all were from the group with FGSI >9. Conclusion: From the results of our descriptive study, at a glance, it appears that there is a tendency for the incidence of Fournier’s gangrene in the elderly and individuals with comorbidities. And the mortality rate increases with a high FGSI value. So that FGSI could be used as a predictor of mortality in patients with FG.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of combination therapy of 4 mg doxazosin + 15 mg meloxicam with 4 mg doxazosin single therapy for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Materials & Methods: A prospective, randomized and double blind study with total of 22 BPH patients with LUTS were randomized to receive 4 mg doxazosin + placebo once daily for 6 weeks or a combination of 4 mg doxazosin + 15 mg meloxicam once daily for 6 weeks. Inclusion criteria included IPSS ≥ 8, age > 50 years, prostate blood flow grade II. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed by comparing changes in IPSS, maximal urinary flow (Q-max) and changes in prostate blood flow between baseline and immediately after 6 weeks of therapy. Results: There was no significant difference in IPSS change between the two treatment groups (delta IPSS 4 ± 1.1 versus 3.7 ± 1.5, p = 0.630). There was a significant difference in Q-max changes between the two groups (delta Q-max 4 ± 1.5 versus 2.1 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). In group therapied with 4 mg doxazosin + 15 mg meloxicam prostate blood flow decreased from grade II to grade I in 9 of 11 patients (81%). Whereas, in the treatment group of 4 mg doxazosin + placebo no reduction was found in prostate blood flow. Conclusion: Combination therapy of 4 mg doxazosin + 15 mg meloxicam once daily for 6 weeks is better than 4 mg doxazosin therapy alone in improving Q-max and decreasing prostate blood flow in BPH patients with LUTS.Keywords: Benign prostate hyperplasia, inflammation, COX-2 inhibitors.
Introduction: Fournier's gangrene (FG) is an infection of the subcutaneous tissue and fascia that progresses quickly and leads to necrosis. It is more prevalent in male patients and immunocompromised individuals, such as those suffering from uncontrolled diabetes. It has a high mortality rate, which makes its early identification and clinical suspicion critical. This study aimed to compare two laboratory parameters, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and to predict the mortality of FG in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: In a retrospective study, data was retrieved from medical records for the period from January 2014 to December 2020, of patients diagnosed with FG. Recorded data that is age, sex, comorbidities, mortality, and laboratory results (PLR and NLR) were used to assess determinants of survival. Results: There were 23 (17.04%) nonsurvivors among the 135 subjects studied. The mean age was 50.9 ± 14.9 years and men were 103 (83%) patients. Among the participants, diabetes mellitus was the most frequent comorbidity at 74 (54.81%) patients. NLR ≥8 was statistically significant ( P = 0.013) for identifying mortality, while PLR >140 was not. In multivariate analysis, NLR ≥8 was found to be a reliable predictor of the FG mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio 12.062, confidence interval 95% 2.115–68.778, P = 0.005). Conclusion: NLR had prognosis predictive value for FG, whereas PLR did not.
Objective: This study aims to explore the relationship between resistive index (RI) with clinical parameters and degree of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Materials & Methods: We performed clinical examination which included IPSS, uroflowmetry, transrectal prostate ultrasonography for measurement of prostatic volume and RI of prostatic capsular artery, and pressure flow study. We enrolled patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and prostatic volume of more than 20 ml. Statistical analysis utilised correlation and calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve of receiver operating characteristics. Results: Twenty-six patients provided consent to enroll in this study. Mean age was 66,5 ± 6,56 years, mean IPSS was 15,9 ± 7,27, and mean prostatic volume 36,0 ± 23,78. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed normal distribution of all study variables. There was significant correlation between RI and IPSS, Qmax, and BOO (p < 0,05). Correlation coefficients (r) for prostatic volume and BOO was 0,392 (p = 0,048), for Qmax and BOO was -0.515 (p = 0,007), and RI with BOO was 0,414 (p = 0,035). Using cutoff values for RI ≥ 0,70 and BOO ≥ 4, we found sensitivity of 70,0%, specificity of 50,0%, positive predictive value of 46,7% and negative predictive value of 72,7%. Conclusion: Resistive index of prostatic capsular artery is correlated with BOO and has a role in diagnosis of BOO in men with LUTS related toBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).Keywords: Resistive index, transrectal power doppler ultrasonography, lower urinary tract symptoms, bladder outlet obstruction.
Objective: This study evaluate the relationship between the IPSS score, Qmax, and degree of bladder outlet obstruction with transitional zone volume (TZV) and transitional zone index (TZI) in clinical BPH patient. Material & Methods: This is an observational cross sectional study which 26 patients included with clinical BPH between September 2011 until January 2012. General information and other variables are recorded (total prostate volume, TZV, TZI, IPSS score, Qmax and degree of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) according to Schaefer normogram. The data will be descriptive and analytically analyzed. Results: 26 patients with clinical BPH are included in this study, with average age is 64,7 (± 5,98) years. The average volume of the total prostate volume and TZV are 30,35 (± 15,35) gram and 15,31 (± 11,77) gram. Meanwhile the average of TZI is 0,4 (± 0,13). After the normal distribution test was performed, all data is analyzed with Pearson correlation test. A strong correlation was found between IPSS and total prostate volume (r = 0,526, p = 0,006), TZV (r = 0,671, p = 0,000) and TZI (r = 0,812, p = 0,000). A strong correlation is also found between TZI and BOO (r = 0,560, p = 0,003). Meanwhile weak correlation is found between Qmax and total prostate volume (r = -0,105, p = 0,608), TZV (r = -0,103, p = 0,616) and TZI (r = - 0,084, p = 0,734). Another weak correlation is shown between total prostate volume (r = 0,233, p = 0,253) and TZV (r = 0,37, p = 0,062) with degree of BOO according to Schaefer nomogram. Conclusion: TZV has significant correlation with IPSS score, but no significant correlation with Qmax and degree of BOO in patients with clinical BPH. Meanwhile TZI has a significant correlation with IPSS and degree of BOO in patients with clinical BPH. TZI could be performed as a single non invasive procedure to determine BOO in patients with clinical BPH.Keywords: Prostatic hyperplasia, transition zone, ultrasonography, urodynamics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.