The aim of the study was to investigate whether a combination of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) capable of differentiating into cardiac myocytes and endothelial progenitors (EPCs) that mainly promote neoangiogenesis might be able to facilitate tissue repair in myocardial scars. Previous studies have shown that intracoronary transplantation of autologous bone marrow stem cells results in improvement of contractility in infracted areas of human myocardium. Eleven patients with an anteroseptal myocardial infarction (MI) underwent transcoronary transplantation of bone marrow-derived MSCs and EPCs to the infarcted area through the left anterior descending artery. Eleven age- and sex-matched patients served as controls. Wall motion score index was significantly lower at follow-up in the transplantation (P = 0.04) but not in the control group. On stress echocardiography, there was improvement of myocardial contractility in one or more previously nonviable myocardial segments in 5 out of 11 patients (all with recent infarctions) and in none of the controls (P = 0.01). Restoration of uptake of Tc(99m) sestamibi in one or more previously nonviable myocardial scars was seen in 6 out of 11 patients subjected to transplantation and in none of the controls (P = 0.02). Cell transplantation was an independent predictor of improvement of nonviable tissue. Intracoronary transplantation of MSCs and EPCs is feasible, safe, and may contribute to regional regeneration of myocardial tissue early or late following MI.

No abstract

No abstract

Recording of Marshall potential is feasible in patients with paroxysmal AF. Combined epicardial and endocardial catheter ablation of ligament of Marshall tissue may reduce the paroxysms of adrenergic AF.

Aims To perform a comprehensive analysis of all aspects of patient and in-room personnel radiation dosimetry in interventional electrophysiology. Methods and results Measurements were performed during 19 diagnostic electrophysiology studies and 24 catheter ablations. Kerma-area product and exposure time values were 48.7 (6.4-230) Gy cm 2 and 25.5 (4.4-79.2) min for ablation, and 12.5 (4.5-117.2) Gy cm 2 and 4.5 (1.2-31) min for diagnostic studies, respectively. Patient effective doses were 15.2 (2.1-59.6) mSv for ablation and 3.2 (1.3-23.9) mSv for diagnostic procedures. Radiation risk to the patient was estimated to be up to eight cases of fatal cancer in 10 000 procedures. The risk of development of fatal cancer was less than 3 Â 10 26 per procedure to the primary operator. The risk for the nurse and technician was much lower. The dose per procedure for the primary operator was 7.1 mGy at the eyes, 0.79 mGy at the chest under the lead apron, 13.68 mGy at the chest over the apron, 3.82 mGy at the thyroid, 17.76 mGy at the left hand, and 12.11 mGy at the left knee. Conclusion As far as radiation exposure is concerned, electrophysiology studies followed by radiofrequency ablation are safe procedures for both patient and personnel when performed in catheterization laboratories with modern equipment, experienced operators, and standard safety precautions.

No abstract

No abstract

Previous studies have investigated the radiation dose to doctors and patients during coronary angiography and angioplasty, but most of them were retrospective, conducted in the prestent era, and results have not been consistent. Effective dose of 57 patients undergoing coronary angiography and/or angioplasty was assessed by using a dose-area product (DAP) to effective dose conversion factor. Radiation exposure risks to patients were then calculated for each procedure. Thermoluminescent dosimeters, mounted on a specially designed catheter that was advanced to the left or right sinus of Valsalva, were used to measure the dose received by the coronary arteries. Mean effective dose received by patients were 5.0 +/- 0.5 mSv for coronary angiography, 6.6 +/- 1.0 mSv for angioplasty, 10.2 +/- 1.5 mSv for angioplasty followed by stent implantation, 13.6 +/- 2.5 mSv for angiography followed by ad hoc angioplasty, and 16.7 +/- 2.8 mSv for angiography followed by ad hoc angioplasty and stent implantation. Patient risk of developing cancer after each procedure was 0.025%, 0.033%, 0.051%, 0.068%, and 0.084%, respectively. Corresponding mean coronary irradiation doses were 24 +/- 2.5, 31.0 +/- 3.6, 43.6 +/- 7.2, 55.0 +/- 7.5, and 64.7 +/- 5.6 mGy, respectively. A linear relationship of the DAP and the dose at the coronary arteries was found: DAP = 1,273 (cm(2)) x coronary dose (mGy). Radiation exposure to coronary arteries and associated risk to patients are relatively low, even following complicated, multivessel angioplasty with stent implantation. Our method can be used for calculation of radiation risk to patients and radiation dose to coronary arteries by using external dosimeters. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 51:259-264, 2000.