Background Fungal co-infection is a recognised complication of respiratory virus infections, increasing morbidity and mortality, but can be readily treated if diagnosed early. An increasing number of small studies describing aspergillosis in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory distress are being reported, but comprehensive data is lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, risk factors and impact of invasive fungal disease in adult COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory distress. Methods An evaluation of a national, multi-centre, prospective cohort evaluation of an enhanced testing strategy to diagnose invasive fungal disease in COVID-19 intensive care patients. Results were used to generate a mechanism to define aspergillosis in future COVID-19 patients. Results One-hundred and thirty-five adults (median age: 57, M/F: 2·2/1) were screened. The incidence was 26.7% (14.1% aspergillosis, 12·6% yeast infections). The overall mortality rate was 38%; 53% and 31% in patients with and without fungal disease, respectively (P: 0.0387). The mortality rate was reduced by the use of antifungal therapy (Mortality: 38·5% in patients receiving therapy versus 90% in patients not receiving therapy (P: 0.008). The use of corticosteroids (P: 0.007) and history of chronic respiratory disease (P: 0.05) increased the likelihood of aspergillosis. Conclusions Fungal disease occurs frequently in critically ill, mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. The survival benefit observed in patients receiving antifungal therapy implies that the proposed diagnostic and defining criteria are appropriate. Screening using a strategic diagnostic approach and antifungal prophylaxis of patients with risk factors will likely enhance the management of COVID-19 patients.

No abstract

Candidaemia is associated with high mortality. Despite the fact that Candida species account for close to 10% of all nosocomial bloodstream infections, relatively few studies have investigated the management of candidaemia in hospitals. Our objective was to find out how candidaemia is managed in hospitals. Data relating to all episodes of candidaemia for the year 2008 were retrospectively collected in five centres in Scotland and Wales. A total of 96 candidaemic episodes were recorded in the year 2008, yielding 103 isolates of Candida. Fifty candidaemic episodes were caused by Candida albicans. Fluconazole was the most common agent prescribed for the treatment of candidaemia. There was great variation in the prescribed dose of fluconazole. Forty per cent of patients who survived received <2 weeks of systemic antifungal therapy. Central venous catheters (CVC) were removed in 57% of patients. CVC removal was not associated with better survival. The overall mortality was 40.4%. Management of candidaemia varies between the UK centres and is often inadequate. There is need to have consensus on the dosages of antifungal agents and the duration of therapy. The current guidance on removal of CVC in all cases of candidaemia should be reviewed.

No abstract

The problem of cancer is universal; the only variation occurs in the type, site or other clinicoepidemiological parameters. Peculiarly enough, oral cancers caused by chewing tobacco are common in India and some parts of the Indian sub-continent. Oral cancers caused by other carcinogens are not common in these areas. The present study shows a significant association (P less than 0.001) between the use of Indian chewing tobacco and oral cancer. Number of quids, mean quantity of tobacco and mean duration of keeping the quids in the mouth had direct dose and effect relationships in causation of oral cancer. A dose of 10 gms of chewing tobacco for about 26 years was observed to have produced cancerous lesions in the buccal cavity.