No abstract

Due to the increasing incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), there is a need to assess any gaps in awareness and care. A survey was undertaken in 2017 to identify perceived unmet needs from the perspectives of patients/families, patient advocates and health care professionals (HCPs). The survey consisted of 33–37 questions (depending on type of respondent) across four areas: information, care, treatments and research. In total, 443 participants from 26 countries responded: 338 patients/families, 35 advocates and 70 HCPs. Perceived unmet needs regarding provision of information at diagnosis differed between groups. While 59% of HCPs believed they provided sufficient information, informational needs were mostly/fully met for only 30% of patients and 18% of advocates. Additionally, 91% of patients and 97% of advocates felt that patients had to search for information themselves. Availability of Gallium‐68‐Dotatate PET/CT scan was limited for the majority of patients (patients: 73%; advocates: 85%; HCP: 86%), as was access to treatments, particularly peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (patients: 42%; advocates: 95%; HCPs: 77%). All groups felt that standards of care, including psychological needs and diagnosis of mental health, were not fully met. Although about two‐thirds of patients were managed by a multidisciplinary team, 14% of patients reportedly did not have enough contact. All groups supported more patient involvement in research; patients and advocates prioritized improvement in diagnosis and HCPs focused on clinical trials. This survey revealed significant unmet needs but differing perceptions regarding these among the groups. There is a need for investigation and collaboration to improve standards of care for NET patients.

No abstract

4608 Background: CAPTEM is an accepted regimen for patients (pts) with advanced pNETs. Single agent 177Lu-Octreotate PRRT is now a standard of care for progressive WHO Grade (G) 1/2 mNETs. High activity was seen with LuTate/CAPTEM in a single arm Phase I/II trial. This study was undertaken to determine the relative activity of adding CAPTEM to LuTate PRRT in pts with mNETs and pNETs. Methods: Non-comparative randomised open label parallel group phase II trial with 2:1 randomisation to PRRT/CAPTEM (experimental arm) vs. PRRT (mNETs control) and CAPTEM (pNETS control). PRRT/CAPTEM: 7.8GBq LuTate day(D) 10, 8 weekly (wkly) x 4, with b.i.d. oral CAP 750mg/m2 D1-14 & TEM 75mg/m2D10-14, 8 wkly x 4; PRRT: 8 wkly x 4; CAPTEM 8 wkly x 4. Primary endpoint: Progression free survival (PFS). mNETS- at 15 months (mo) assuming 15mo PFS 66.4% in control arm, aiming for PFS ³ 80%; pNETS- at 12mo assuming 12mo PFS 60% in control arm, aiming for PFS ³ 75%. Secondary endpoints: Objective tumour response rate (complete or partial) (OTRR), clinical benefit rate (OTRR, stable disease) (CBR), toxicity, quality of life. Results: 75 pts enrolled (Dec 2015 – Nov 2018): mNETs 33 PRRT/CAPTEM and 14 PRRT; pNETS 19 PRRT/CAPTEM and 9 CAPTEM. mNETS: Median follow-up 35mo; 15mo PFS was 90% (95% CI: 73-97%) v 92% (95% CI: 57-99%); OTRR 31% vs 15%; and CBR 97% vs 92% for PRRT/CAPTEM v PRRT respectively. Treatment related adverse events (AEs): 24/32 PRRT/CAPTEM pts had at least one G3 event (75%) vs 5/13 (38%, PRRT); and 4/32 pts at least one G4 event (13%) v 1/13 (8%) respectively, mostly haematologic (haem). Only one patient failed to complete therapy (PRRT/CAPTEM). pNETS: Median follow-up 34mo; 12mo PFS was 76% (95% CI: 48-90%) v 67% (95% CI: 28-88%); OTRR 68% vs 33%; and CBR 100% vs 100% for PRRT/CAPTEM v CAPTEM respectively. Treatment related AEs: 5/18 PRRT/CAPTEM pts had at least one G3 event (28%) vs 3/9 (33%) CAPTEM; 3/18 pts at least one G4 event (17%) v 1/9 (11%) respectively. Conclusions: CAPTEM/PRRT is active, meeting its target landmark PFS for CAPTEM/PRRT (12mo pNETs; 15mo mNETs) with numerically greater OTRR in both pNETs and mNETs, but with more haem toxicity in mNETs. As activity was high in both control arms longer follow up is required to determine if the relative activity of PRRT/CAPTEM is sufficient to warrant Phase III evaluation. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12615000909527 .

127 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare and complex neoplasms with increasing incidence and prevalence worldwide. SCAN assessed global delivery of healthcare to NET patients. This analysis focused for the first time on healthcare quality evaluation by economic areas–Advanced Economies (AE) and Emerging and Developing Economies (EDE) classification used as per the International Monetary Fund. Methods: During Sept-Nov 2019, NET patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) completed an online survey (available in 14 languages). Results: There were 2795 respondents from 68 countries across 6 continents. AE NET patients/carers were 88% [2076/2359], EDE were 12% [283/2359]. HCPs were evenly spread 51% AE [221/436] vs. 49% EDE [215/436]. The average evaluation score provided by NET patients to the healthcare received in the country they reside in for more than 6 months was 3.6 in AE, while one point lower 2.5 in EDE on a 5-point Likert scale (1-poor, 5-excellent). HCPs’ and NET patients’ scores were aligned: 3.9 as per AE HCPs (94% [208/221]), vs. 2.6 by EDE HCPs (68% [190/283]). The availability of top 3 most used NET treatments over the past 12 months was significantly lower in EDE: surgery in AE reached 85% (1765/2076) vs. EDE 71% (201/283) p<0.0001 [Chi-squared], somatostatin analogues - in AE 67% (1391/2076) vs. EDE 59% (167/283) p<0.0001, PRRT was 57% in AE countries (1183/2076), vs. EDE 33% (93/283) p<0.0001. Specialized services were of low usage globally and in deep disparity by economic areas, namely: NET specialist consultations (AE 55% [1143/2076] vs. EDE 40% [112/283] p<0.0001), multidisciplinary team care 34% (AE 34% [706/2076] vs. EDE 22% [63/283] p<0.0001), a clinical nurse specialized in NETs (AE 28% [589/2076] vs. EDE 7% [21/283] p<0.0001), psychological care (AE 13% [261/2076] vs. EDE 5% [15/283] p<0.0001), physical activities like yoga classes, trainings designed for cancer patients (AE 11% [220/2076] vs. EDE 3% [7/283] p<0.0001). State healthcare coverage was claimed by half of AE NET patients (51% [1064/2076]). National healthcare plan that covered NETs was mentioned by only a third of EDE NET patients (30% [85/283]. Conclusions: Availability of treatments and access to specialized NET healthcare is a global challenge and is in need of improvement. Additionally, the gap between AE and EDE in terms of treatments availability, support services usage, and state healthcare coverage is significant and manifests deep inequality.

4122 Background: CAPTEM is an accepted regimen for patients (pts) with advanced pNETs. Single agent PRRT is now a standard of care for progressive WHO Grade 1/2 mNETs. High activity was seen with PRRT/CAPTEM in a single arm Phase I/II trial. This study aims to determine the activity of combining CAPTEM with PRRT in mNETs and pNETs pts. Methods: Non-comparative randomised open label parallel group phase II trial with 2:1 randomisation to PRRT/CAPTEM (experimental arm) vs. PRRT (mNETs control) and CAPTEM (pNETS control). PRRT/CAPTEM: 7.8GBq 177Lu Octreotate (Lutate) given intravenously (IV) on day 10 every 8 weeks for 4 cycles, with concurrent oral capecitabine 750mg/m2 b.i.d. days 1-14 and temozolomide 75mg/m2 b.i.d. days 10-14 every 56 day cycle, up to 4 cycles. PRRT alone: 7.8GBq 177Lu Octreotate (Lutate) given intravenously (IV) on day 1 every 8 weeks for 4 cycles. CAPTEM alone: Oral capecitabine 750mg/m2 b.i.d. days 1-14 and days 29-42; Oral temozolomide 75mg/m2 b.i.d. days 10-14 and 38-42 every 56 day (8w) cycle. Primary endpoint: Progression free survival (PFS). mNETS: At 15 months, assuming PFS 66.4% in control arm; target PFS ³ 80%; pNETS: At 12 months, assuming PFS 60% in control arm; target PFS ³ 75%. Secondary endpoints: Objective tumor response rate (complete or partial) (OTRR), overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs). Results: 75 pts enrolled (Dec 2015 – Nov 2018): mNETs 33 PRRT/CAPTEM, 14 PRRT, median follow up (mFU) 60.3 months; pNETS 19 PRRT/CAPTEM, 9 CAPTEM, mFU 57.5 months (mo). Late Grade 3/4 haematologic AEs: mNETS: 2/32 (6%) PRRT/CAPTEM pts and 4/13 (31%) PRRT pts. Events included myelodysplastic syndrome (40 mo), leukaemia (60 mo), pancytopenia (50 mo), anaemia (32 mo), thrombocytopenia (7 mo). No late haematologic G3/4 AEs were reported in the pNETS cohort. No late renal toxicity was identified in all study arms. Conclusions: CONTROL NETs is the first randomized trial to demonstrate efficacy for PRRT in pNETs, in addition to a standard of care. Extended follow up confirms durable CAPTEM/PRRT activity, with superior PFS in pNETs. Late haematologic toxicity was seen in both mNET PRRT arms but was not higher with additional CAPTEM. The activity of CAPTEM/PRRT in pNETs should be tested in the phase III setting. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12615000909527. [Table: see text]

TPS514 Background: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), which represent approximately 70% of NETs, frequently develop metastatic disease with limited treatment options. Current standard therapies for well-differentiated high grade 2 and grade 3 GEP-NETs include cytoreductive procedures, somatostatin analogues, molecular targeted therapies (everolimus or sunitinib), chemotherapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), with no specified sequence of use. PRRT may stabilize disease and induce objective tumor responses. This treatment uses radiolabeled somatostatin analogues to selectively target somatostatin receptor expressing (SSTR+) tumor cells. 177Lu-edotreotide is an innovative radiolabeled somatostatin analogue with a favorable safety profile and promising efficacy. Retrospective data in metastatic GEP-NETs treated with two or more 177Lu-edotreotide cycles demonstrated a progression free survival (PFS) of at least 30 months. The currently recruiting Phase III COMPETE trial compares the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-edotreotide, versus everolimus, in grade 1 and grade 2 GEP-NETs. Methods: COMPOSE (NCT04919226) is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-center Phase III study, in patients with well-differentiated high grade 2 and grade 3 (Ki-67 index 15−55%), SSTR+, GEP-NETs. This trial is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcomes of first- or second-line treatment with 177Lu-edotreotide PRRT compared to best standard of care. It aims to randomize 202 patients 1:1 to a defined number of cycles of 177Lu-edotreotide or an active comparator (either chemotherapy [CAPTEM or FOLFOX] or everolimus, according to investigator´s choice). The primary endpoint is PFS, assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression (RECIST v1.1), or death, whichever occurs earlier. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, assessed up to 2 years after disease progression. Study recruitment for COMPOSE commenced in September 2021. It is expected that COMPOSE will inform optimal treatment options for patients with well-differentiated high grade 2 and grade 3 SSTR+ GEP-NETs, including for first-line therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04919226.

HGNEC. Sublobar resection might increase the risk of death in HGNEC patients. Therefore if the general condition of the patient permits, perioperative chemotherapy should be performed, and the extent of resection in the treatment of HGNEC should be lobectomy or more.