U-BIOPRED is a European Union consortium of 20 academic institutions, 11 pharmaceutical companies and six patient organisations with the objective of improving the understanding of asthma disease mechanisms using a systems biology approach.This cross-sectional assessment of adults with severe asthma, mild/moderate asthma and healthy controls from 11 European countries consisted of analyses of patient-reported outcomes, lung function, blood and airway inflammatory measurements.Patients with severe asthma (nonsmokers, n=311; smokers/ex-smokers, n=110) had more symptoms and exacerbations compared to patients with mild/moderate disease (n=88) (2.5 exacerbations versus 0.4 in the preceding 12 months; p<0.001), with worse quality of life, and higher levels of anxiety and depression. They also had a higher incidence of nasal polyps and gastro-oesophageal reflux with lower lung function. Sputum eosinophil count was higher in severe asthma compared to mild/moderate asthma (median count 2.99% versus 1.05%; p=0.004) despite treatment with higher doses of inhaled and/or oral corticosteroids.Consistent with other severe asthma cohorts, U-BIOPRED is characterised by poor symptom control, increased comorbidity and airway inflammation, despite high levels of treatment. It is well suited to identify asthma phenotypes using the array of "omic" datasets that are at the core of this systems medicine approach. @ERSpublications Severe asthma results in more airway inflammation, worse symptoms and lower lung function, despite increased therapy http://ow.ly/QznR3

Clustering based on clinicophysiologic parameters yielded 4 stable and reproducible clusters that associate with different pathobiological pathways.

@ERSpublicationsChildren with severe preschool wheeze or severe asthma are usually atopic and have impaired quality of life http://ow.ly/RrrGE

Background Long‐COVID is a well‐documented multisystem disease in adults. Far less is known about long‐term sequelae of COVID in children. Here, we report on the occurrence of long‐COVID in Dutch children. Patients and Methods We conducted a national survey asking Dutch pediatricians to share their experiences on long‐COVID in children. We furthermore describe a case series of six children with long‐COVID to explore the clinical features in greater detail. Results With a response rate of 78% of Dutch pediatric departments, we identified 89 children, aged 2–18 years, suspected of long‐COVID with various complaints. Of these children, 36% experienced severe limitations in daily function. The most common complaints were fatigue, dyspnea, and concentration difficulties with 87%, 55%, and 45% respectively. Our case series emphasizes the nonspecific and broad clinical manifestations seen in post‐COVID complaints. Conclusion Our study shows that long‐COVID is also present in the pediatric population. The main symptoms resemble those previously described in adults. This novel condition demands a multidisciplinary approach with international awareness and consensus to aid early detection and effective management.

BackgroundIn patients with prednisone-dependent asthma the dose of oral corticosteroids should be adjusted to the lowest possible level to reduce long-term adverse effects. However, the optimal strategy for tapering oral corticosteroids is unknown. Objective To investigate whether an internet-based management tool including home monitoring of symptoms, lung function and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FE NO ) facilitates tapering of oral corticosteroids and leads to reduction of corticosteroid consumption without worsening asthma control or asthma-related quality of life. Methods In a 6-month pragmatic randomised prospective multicentre study, 95 adults with prednisone-dependent asthma from six pulmonary outpatient clinics were allocated to two tapering strategies: according to conventional treatment (n¼43) or guided by a novel internet-based monitoring system (internet strategy) (n¼52). Primary outcomes were cumulative sparing of prednisone, asthma control and asthma-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ), exacerbations, hospitalisations and patient's satisfaction with the tapering strategy. Results Median cumulative sparing of prednisone was 205 (25e75th percentile À221 to 777) mg in the internet strategy group compared with 0 (À497 to 282) mg in the conventional treatment group (p¼0.02). Changes in prednisone dose (mixed effect regression model) from baseline were À4.79 mg/day and +1.59 mg/day, respectively (p<0.001). Asthma control, asthma-related quality of life, FEV 1 , exacerbations, hospitalisations and satisfaction with the strategy were not different between groups. Conclusions An internet-based management tool including home monitoring of symptoms, lung function and FE NO in severe asthma is superior to conventional treatment in reducing total corticosteroid consumption without compromising asthma control or asthma-related quality of life. Clinical trial registration number Clinical trial registered with http://www.trialregister.nl (Netherlands Trial Register number 1146).

U-BIOPRED cohort n=91 epithelial brushings or biopsies IL-17 High Clinical phenotype Nasal polyps Smoking Antibiotic use Epithelial Gene Expression Profile Clinical phenotype FeNO Exacerbations Gene expression shared with psoriasis IDO1 IL1B DEFB4B S100A8, S100A9 PI3 CXCL3, CXCL8 CXCL10, CCL20 Gene signature SERPINB2 POSTN CLCA1 IL-13 High T cell infiltration Neutrophilia Eosinophilia IL-17-high asthma with features of a psoriasis immunophenotype From a the Respiratory,

The beneficial effects of high-altitude treatment in asthma have been attributed to allergen avoidance. Recent evidence shows that this treatment also improves airway inflammation in nonallergic patients. We hypothesised that high-altitude treatment is clinically equally effective in patients with severe refractory asthma, with or without allergic sensitisation.In a prospective observational cohort study, 137 adults with severe refractory asthma (92 with allergic sensitisation), referred for high-altitude (1,600 m) treatment in Davos, Switzerland, were consecutively included. We measured asthma control (Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)), asthma-related quality of life (Asthma-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)), sino-nasal symptoms (Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20)), medication requirement, postbronchodilator (post-BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), 6-min walking distance (6MWD), total immunoglobulin (Ig)E, blood eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FeNO) at admission and after 12 weeks.Sensitised and nonsensitised patients showed similar improvements in ACQ (-1.4 and -1.5, respectively; p50.79), AQLQ (1.6 and 1.5, respectively; p50.94), SNOT-20 (-0.7 and -0.5, respectively; p50.18), post-BD FEV1 (6.1% and 5.8% pred, respectively; p50.87), 6MWD (+125 m and +147 m, respectively; p50.43) and oral steroids (40% versus 44%, respectively; p50.51). Sensitised patients showed a larger decrease in total IgE, blood eosinophils and FeNO.High-altitude treatment improves clinical and functional parameters, and decreases oral corticosteroid requirement in patients with severe refractory asthma, irrespective of allergic sensitisation.

No abstract