Nitrogen budgets in microalgae are strongly affected by growth conditions and physiological state of the cultures. As a consequence, protein N (PN) to total N (TN) ratio may be variable in microalgae grown in batch cultures, and this may limit the usefulness of the nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors (N-Prot factors), the most practical way of determining protein content. The accuracy of protein determination by this method depends on the establishment of specific N-Prot factors, and experimental data are needed to fill this gap. Complementing a previous study, the present work was designed to quantify the fluctuations of the main nitrogenous compounds during the growth of 12 species of marine microalgae, as well as to determine N-Prot factors for them. The microalgae were cultured in two experimental conditions: (a) using a N-replete culture medium (initial N concentration, 1.18 mM) and aeration, and (b) with a N-depleted culture medium (initial N concentration, 235 mM) and no aeration. The distribution of intracellular nitrogen was studied by constructing budgets of different nitrogen pools in different growth phases of the cultures. In all species, large variations occurred in the distribution of PN and non-protein N (NPN) in the treatments tested and in different growth phases. Intracellular inorganic nitrogen (NO 3 7 , NO 2 7 and NH 3 + NH 4 +) was the most important NPN component (0.4-30.4% of TN) in all species, followed by nucleic acids (0.3-12.2% of TN), and chlorophylls (0.1-1.8% of TN). The relative importance of NPN was greater in the exponential phase, decreasing during growth. PN ranged from 59.3 to 96.8% of TN. N-Prot factors are proposed for each of the species studied, based on the ratio of amino acid residues to TN, with values ranging from 2.53 to 5.77. Based on current results and on the previous study, we establish an overall average N-Prot factor for all species, treatments and growth phases of 4.78 + 0.62 (n = 354). This study confirms that the use of the traditional factor 6.25 is unsuitable for marine microalgae, and the use of the N-Prot factors proposed here is recommended.

Comparison of data of protein content in algae is very difficult, primarily due to differences in the analytical methods employed. The different extraction procedures (exposure to water, grinding, etc.), protein precipitation using different amounts of 25% trichloroacetic acid and quantification of protein by two different methods and using two protein standards were evaluated. All procedures were tested using freeze-dried samples of three macroalgae: Porphyra acanthophora var. acanthophora, Sargassum vulgare and Ulva fasciata. Based on these results, a protocol for protein extraction was developed, involving the immersion of samples in 4.0 mL ultra-pure water for 12 h, followed by complete grinding of the samples with a Potter homogeniser. The precipitation of protein should be done with 2.5:1 25% TCA:homogenate (v/v). The protocol for extraction and precipitation of protein developed in this study was tested with other macroalgae (Aglaothamnion uruguayense, Caulerpa fastigiata, Chnoospora minima, Codium decorticatum, Dictyota menstrualis, Padina gymnospora and Pterocladiella capillacea) and microalgae (Amphidinium carterae, Dunaliella tertiolecta, Hillea sp., Isochrysis galbana and Skeletonema costatum). Comparison with the actual protein content determined from the sum of amino acid residues, suggests that Lowry's method should be used instead of Bradford's using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as protein standard instead of casein. This may be related to the reactivity of the protein standards and the greater similarity in the amino acid composition of BSA and algae. The current results should contribute to more accurate protein determinations in marine algae.

The use of nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors (N-Prot factors) is the most practical way of determining protein content. The accuracy of protein determination by this method depends on the establishment of N-Prot factors specific to individual species. Experimental data are needed to allow the use of this methodology with seaweeds. The present study was designed to characterize the amino acid composition and to establish specific N-Prot factors for six green, four brown and nine red marine algae. Mean values for individual amino acids tended to be similar among the three groups, but some differences were found. Green algae tended to show lower percentages of both aspartic acid and glutamic acid than the other two groups of algae. The percentages of both lysine and arginine were higher in red algae, while brown algae tended to show more methionine than green and red algae. The actual protein content of the species, based on the sum of amino acid residues, varied from 10.8% (Chnoospora minima, brown algae) to 23.1% (Aglaothamnion uruguayense, red algae) of the dry weight. Nitrogen-toprotein conversion factors were established for the species studied, based on the ratio of amino acid residues to total nitrogen, with values ranging from 3.75 (Cryptonemia seminervis, red algae) to 5.72 (Padina gymnospora, brown algae). The relative importance of non-protein nitrogen is greater in red algae, and consequently lower N-Prot factors were calculated for these species (average value 4.59). Conversely, protein nitrogen content in both green and brown algae tends to be higher, and average N-Prot factors were 5.13 and 5.38, respectively. An overall average N-Prot factor for all species studied of 4.92 ± 0.59 (n = 57) was established. This study confirms that the use of the traditional factor 6.25 is unsuitable for seaweeds, and the use of the N-Prot factors proposed here is recommended.

Of the grading systems evaluated, Histologic Risk Assessment demonstrated the best results for survival prediction in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

SUMMARY The use of nitrogen‐to‐protein conversion factors (N‐Prot factors) is the most practical way of determining protein content. The accuracy of protein determination by this method depends on the establishment of N‐Prot factors specific to individual species. Experimental data are needed to allow the use of this methodology with seaweeds. The present study was designed to characterize the amino acid composition and to establish specific N‐Prot factors for six green, four brown and nine red marine algae. Mean values for individual amino acids tended to be similar among the three groups, but some differences were found. Green algae tended to show lower percentages of both aspartic acid and glutamic acid than the other two groups of algae. The percentages of both lysine and arginine were higher in red algae, while brown algae tended to show more methionine than green and red algae. The actual protein content of the species, based on the sum of amino acid residues, varied from 10.8% (Chnoospora minima, brown algae) to 23.1% (Aglaothamnion uru‐guayense, red algae) of the dry weight. Nitrogen‐to‐protein conversion factors were established for the species studied, based on the ratio of amino acid residues to total nitrogen, with values ranging from 3.75 (Cryptonemia seminervis, red algae) to 5.72 (Padina gymnospora, brown algae). The relative importance of non‐protein nitrogen is greater in red algae, and consequently lower N‐Prot factors were calculated for these species (average value 4.59). Conversely, protein nitrogen content in both green and brown algae tends to be higher, and average N‐Prot factors were 5.13 and 5.38, respectively. An overall average N‐Prot factor for all species studied of 4.92 ± 0.59 (n = 57) was established. This study confirms that the use of the traditional factor 6.25 is unsuitable for seaweeds, and the use of the N‐Prot factors proposed here is recommended.

The utilization of nitrogen‐to‐protein conversion factors (N‐Prot factors) is a widely accepted and practical way to determine total protein content. The accuracy of protein determination depends on the establishment of specific N‐Prot factors, since the conventional factor of 6.25 may be unsuitable for all species. This study was designed to determine the concentrations of the main nitrogenous compounds and to establish N‐Prot factors specific for the following marine microalgae: Chlorella minutissima, Dunaliella tertiolecta, Hillea sp., Isochrysis galbana, Nannochloropsis oculata, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Prorocentrum minimum, Skeletonema costatum, Synechococcus subsalsus, and Tetraselmis gracilis. Cultures were maintained under a 12‐h photoperiod (300 μmol photons·m−2·s−1) at temperatures of 20.0°± 1.0° C (dark) to 23.0°± 2.0° C (light) in Walne’s culture medium without additional external carbon sources. The distribution of intracellular nitrogen was studied by determining total nitrogen (TN, by CHN [carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen] analysis), protein N (PN, by analysis of total amino acids), and nonprotein N (NPN, determined by analysis of DNA, RNA, chlorophylls (chl) a,b, and c, and intracellular inorganic nitrogen—NO3−, NO2−, and NH3+ NH4+) in logarithmic and stationary growth phases of cultures. Variations occurred in both accumulation and distribution of PN and NPN among the species, as well as in each species during the different growth phases. Inorganic nitrogen compounds were observed to be the most important NPN source (from 6.4 ± 0.1% to 41.8 ± 4.2% of total N) in all species (except D. tertiolecta), followed by nucleic acids (from 0.8 ± 0.1% to 26.1 ± 2.4% of TN) and chlorophylls (from 0.2 ± 0.0% to 3.1 ± 0.3% of TN). Total amino acid residues ranged from 63.1 ± 4.6% up to 88.1 ± 11.2% of TN, which is in agreement with the presence of high NPN concentrations. N‐Prot factors are proposed for each growth phase in the studied species, based on the ratio of amino acid residues to TN, establishing specific N‐prot factors ranging from 3.60 ± 0.27 to 4.99 ± 0.64. The mean N‐Prot factor for all species/growth phases was 4.58 ± 0.11. The present study shows that the use of the traditional factor 6.25 is not suitable for these marine microalgae, and possibly for other species, because it overestimates their actual protein content.

Objective: This article presents the results of a retrospective study of the frequency and classification of odontogenic tumors recorded at four centers of diagnostic pathology in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Study Design: All medical records and microscopic slides of odontogenic tumor specimens for the years 1997 to 2007 were retrieved from the files of four services of diagnostic pathology in Rio de Janeiro City. Diagnoses were re-evaluated and the tumors classified according to the latest (2005) World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Results: A total of 201 odontogenic tumors were found among 15,758 oral biopsies (1.3%). The frequencies of these tumors at the four centers ranged from 0.5% at the National Cancer Institute to 3.3% in a private laboratory. Chi-square analysis revealed statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between the proportions of odontogenic tumors in the studied centers. Of these, 94.5% were benign and 5.5% were malignant. Keratocystic odontogenic tumor (32.3%) was the most frequent lesion, followed by ameloblastoma (29.8%) and odontoma (18.4%). Conclusions: Odontogenic tumors are uncommon in Brazil. Different pathology laboratories reported divergent frequencies of odontogenic tumors, which may reflect institutional specializations and the patient populations served. Key words:Odontogenic tumors, jaw neoplasms, epidemiology, WHO classification.

No abstract