The concept of public -private partnership has generated interest worldwide due to the need for public services associated with the need to limit public spending that is seen as an alternative for the development of major projects or public service delivery typically developed or provided by the public sector. Legal
To mitigate the economic and social impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and to increase the sustainability and resilience of European economies and societies, as well as to better prepare them for the challenges and opportunities generated by the green and digital transition, the European Union has put at the disposal of the member states a temporary recovery tool: The Recovery and Resilience Facility.
In order to use this financing instrument, each EU member state must draw up its own Recovery and Resilience Plan, through which it establishes its priority investment areas for the purpose of exiting the crisis, economic recovery and increasing the resilience capacity.
On the basis of such a National Plan, the Romanian legislator proposed through a draft Emergency Ordinance some changes to the fiscal legislation, which interferes with the insolvency legislation.
According to these proposals, it is intended that the tax authorities have new prerogatives in the context of insolvencies in which they have the capacity of a creditor, i.e. the holding of additional powers of supervision of the insolvency practitioner, the possibility of requesting bankruptcy if they consider that the company in insolvency has inappropriate behavior, and attributions in relation to public auctions organized by the debtor in insolvency.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the compatibility of these legislative proposals with the principles of the insolvency procedure, as they derive from European normative acts and from the national legislation of Romania.
A major issue in contemporary society, one that engenders debates and disputes among philosophers, sociologists, psychologists, jurists and other specialists refers to the drastic change of the structure and functions of the traditional family. Due to the great number of people who prefer to live alone, divorce, in single-parent families or consensual unions, the values of the traditional family are questioned and often seem totally outdated. In this article we aim to analyze the changes produced into the content of the notion of family in the contemporary society in contrast to the traditional family ideas and values. We believe that, as society and the state evolved becoming increasingly complex, the role of the state in the individual's life grew and the family's influence diminished. From our point of view, one of the reasons why the contemporary family is so different from the traditional family is due to the increased influence of the state in the individual's life through its institutions and the legal order: social protection, ensuring a decent living standard, education etc. In order to support this idea, we will present a series of philosophical and legal arguments through which we will try to demonstrate that the major influence of the state and the law in the individual's life constitutes an essential element that has led to a decrease in the influence of the traditional family.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.