Marine diazotrophs fix dinitrogen gas into bioavailable nitrogen that drives the ocean nitrogen cycle; yet, efforts to infer global diazotroph distributions have been limited by a sparsity of observations. In situ measurements of nifH gene abundance (essential for nitrogen fixation) are increasingly being used to inform the biogeography of diazotrophs. However, comparing such gene abundances spatially, temporally and between diazotroph species remains difficult. We synthesize existing data on gene-to-cell and cell-to-biomass conversions for four major diazotroph groups to convert nifH gene counts to abundance-and biomass-based biogeographic "currencies." Results suggest up to two orders of magnitude uncertainty converting from nifH gene abundance to cell abundance, and up to four orders of magnitude uncertainty from nifH gene abundance to biomass. Uncertainty arises due to large taxonomic variation in cell size and presumed polyploidy, that is, variability in the number of genomes per cell. Such uncertainties hinder comparing biogeographies of different species. Additionally, numerical models need biogeographies for validation, typically in the currency of carbon biomass. Here, we show that conversion uncertainty from nifH gene abundance to biomass overwhelms biomass variability simulated in such models. These results demonstrate a basic currency problem in converting gene abundance observations to biogeographically meaningful quantities for synthesizing studies and modeling approaches. Such issues may also have relevance to other genes and organisms beyond diazotrophs. To avoid biases in interpreting gene counts as a measure of abundance, we suggest converting gene counts to a binary presence/ non-detect metric to map broad biogeographical distributions more robustly.
Tropical cyclones (TCs) cause devastating damage to life and property. Historical TC data is scarce, complicating adequate TC risk assessments. Synthetic TC models are specifically designed to overcome this scarcity. While these models have been evaluated on their ability to simulate TC activity, no study to date has focused on model performance and applicability in TC risk assessments. This study performs the intercomparison of four different global-scale synthetic TC datasets in the impact space, comparing impact return period curves, probability of rare events, and hazard intensity distribution over land. We find that the model choice influences the costliest events, particularly in basins with limited TC activity. Modelled direct economic damages in the North Indian Ocean, for instance, range from 40 to 246 billion USD for the 100-yr event over the four hazard sets. We furthermore provide guidelines for the suitability of the different synthetic models for various research purposes.
Abstract. Modelling the risk of natural hazards for society, ecosystems, and the economy is subject to strong uncertainties, even more so in the context of a changing climate, evolving societies, growing economies, and declining ecosystems. Here, we present a new feature of the climate-risk modelling platform CLIMADA (CLIMate ADAptation), which allows us to carry out global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. CLIMADA underpins the Economics of Climate Adaptation (ECA) methodology which provides decision-makers with a fact base to understand the impact of weather and climate on their economies, communities, and ecosystems, including the appraisal of bespoke adaptation options today and in future. We apply the new feature to an ECA analysis of risk from tropical cyclone storm surge to people in Vietnam to showcase the comprehensive treatment of uncertainty and sensitivity of the model outputs, such as the spatial distribution of risk exceedance probabilities or the benefits of different adaptation options. We argue that broader application of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis will enhance transparency and intercomparison of studies among climate-risk modellers and help focus future research. For decision-makers and other users of climate-risk modelling, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis has the potential to lead to better-informed decisions on climate adaptation. Beyond provision of uncertainty quantification, the presented approach does contextualize risk assessment and options appraisal, and might be used to inform the development of storylines and climate adaptation narratives.
Tropical cyclones (TCs) cause devastating damage to life and property. Historical TC data is scarce, complicating adequate TC risk assessments. Synthetic TC models are specifically designed to overcome this scarcity. While these models have been evaluated on their ability to simulate TC activity, no study to date has focused on the model performance and applicability in TC risk assessments. This study performs the first model intercomparison of four different global-scale synthetic TC datasets in the impact space, comparing impact return period curves, probability of rare events, and hazard intensity distribution over land. We find that the model choice influences the costliest events, particularly in basins with limited TC activity. Modelled direct economic damages in the North Indian Ocean, for instance, range from 40 to 246 billion USD for the 100-yr event over the four synthetic hazard sets. We furthermore provide guidelines for the suitability of the different synthetic models for various research purposes.
Modelling the risk of natural hazards for society, ecosystems, and the economy is subject to strong uncertainties, even more so in the context of a changing climate, evolving societies, growing economies, and declining ecosystems. Here we present a new feature of the climate risk modelling platform CLIMADA which allows to carry out global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. CLIMADA underpins the Economics of Climate Adaptation (ECA) methodology which provides decision makers with a fact-base to understand the impact of weather and climate on their economies, communities, and ecosystems, including appraisal of bespoke adaptation options today and in future. We apply the new feature to an ECA analysis of risk from tropical cyclone storm surge to people in Vietnam to showcase the comprehensive treatment of uncertainty and sensitivity of the model outputs, such as the spatial distribution of risk exceedance probabilities or the benefits of different adaptation options. We argue that broader application of uncertainty and sensitivity analyses will enhance transparency and inter-comparison of studies among climate risk modellers and help focus future research. For decision-makers and other users of climate risk modelling, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis has the potential to lead to better-informed decisions on climate adaptation. Beyond provision of uncertainty quantification, the presented approach does contextualise risk assessment and options appraisal, and might be used to inform the development of story-lines and climate adaptation narratives.
Tropical cyclone (TC) risks are expected to increase with climate change and socio-economic development and are subject to substantial uncertainties. We thus assess future global TC risk drivers and perform a systematic uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. We combine synthetic TCs downscaled from CMIP6 global climate models (GCMs) for several emission scenarios with economic growth factors derived from the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) and a wide range of vulnerability functions. We find a non-linear effect between climate change and socio-economic development that drives the future TC risk. Furthermore, we show that the choice of GCM affects the output uncertainty most among all varied model input factors. Finally, we discover a positive correlation between climate sensitivity and TC risk increase. We conclude that uncertainty and sensitivity analysis are powerful tools to improve the information value of climate-risk models, producing transparent output and providing a comprehensive context to quantitative results for robust decision-making.
<p>Tropical cyclones (TCs) are among the most devastating natural hazards putting populations and assets at risk. This risk is expected to increase further in a warming climate and with socio-economic development. It is, therefore, of great importance and the aim of our study to assess the drivers and uncertainties of global TC risk in the future. We use a large set of synthetic TCs downscaled from various general circulation models (GCMs) and different warming scenarios of the CMIP6 generation to simulate TC activity at the middle and end of this century. In parallel, we derive economic growth factors from different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) to approximate socio-economic development. We combine these future representations of hazard and exposure data with vulnerability functions to estimate the TC risk increase in the future, using an open-source probabilistic impact model (CLIMADA). Furthermore, we perform a systematic uncertainty and sensitivity analysis to understand which of the model input factors contribute most to the uncertainty in the future TC risk increase. First, we find a non-linear effect between climate change and socio-economic development that drives the total future risk. Second, we show that the choice of GCM affects the output uncertainty most among all varied input factors. However, we note that exposure and vulnerability data are notoriously sparse and that advances in future TC risk assessment also depend on a better representation of these components. Ultimately, unraveling these unknowns of global TC risk in the future may help focus future research efforts and enables better-informed adaptation decisions and mitigation strategies.</p>
Abstract. Modelling the risk of natural hazards for society, ecosystems, and the economy is subject to strong uncertainties, even more so in the context of a changing climate, evolving societies, growing economies, and declining ecosystems. Here we present a new feature of the climate risk modelling platform CLIMADA which allows to carry out global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. CLIMADA underpins the Economics of Climate Adaptation (ECA) methodology which provides decision makers with a fact-base to understand the impact of weather and climate on their economies, communities, and ecosystems, including appraisal of bespoke adaptation options today and in future. We apply the new feature to an ECA analysis of risk from tropical cyclone storm surge to people in Vietnam to showcase the comprehensive treatment of uncertainty and sensitivity of the model outputs, such as the spatial distribution of risk exceedance probabilities or the benefits of different adaptation options. We argue that broader application of uncertainty and sensitivity analyses will enhance transparency and inter-comparison of studies among climate risk modellers and help focus future research. For decision-makers and other users of climate risk modelling, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis has the potential to lead to better-informed decisions on climate adaptation. Beyond provision of uncertainty quantification, the presented approach does contextualise risk assessment and options appraisal, and might be used to inform the development of story-lines and climate adaptation narratives.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.