No abstract

In our clinical work we have occasionally encountered difficulties (e.g., no response, concomitant brachial plexus stimulation) in performing phrenic nerve conduction studies. The aim of this study was to overcome these difficulties and obtain our own set of normative data. In 29 healthy volunteers (15 men), aged 21-65 years, phrenic nerve conduction studies were performed using bipolar surface stimulation electrodes and a standard recording montage. Stimulation just above the clavicle, between the sternal and clavicular heads of the sternocleidomastoid muscles, elicited responses at the lowest stimulation strength, without concomitant brachial plexus stimulation. M-wave amplitude and duration changed with respiration, whereas latency and area did not. The normative limit for M-wave latency was 8.0 ms (upper), for amplitude it was 0.46/0.33 mV (lower: inspiration/expiration), and for area it was 4.4 mVms (lower). We suggest a slight modification of the generally used position for phrenic nerve stimulation, and the use of M-wave latency and area (unaffected by the respiratory cycle) in future phrenic nerve conduction studies. Phrenic nerve conduction studies have been used for a number of years in the evaluation of patients with respiratory failure and suspected neuromuscular disorders. 2,8,12 Although several approaches to phrenic nerve stimulation have been described, stimulation at the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle, both at the level of the upper margin of the thyroid cartilage 5,7,8 and in the supraclavicular fossa just above the clavicle, 3,6,9,11 occasionally results in difficulties in obtaining a well-formed and reproducible supramaximal compound motor action potential (CMAP). Furthermore, using these stimulation sites, concomitant brachial plexus stimulation has also often proven to be a problem. 3,5,[7][8][9] In addition, as only limited information has been published on the stimulation strength needed to record maximal amplitude phrenic nerve CMAPs, 3 excessive electrical currents might be used unnecessarily in these studies, particularly in patients with phrenic nerve abnormalities.The aims of the present study were to: (1) determine a better position for phrenic nerve stimulation; (2) define the stimulation strength needed to obtain supramaximal CMAPs in healthy volunteers; (3) calculate normative data for all nerve conduction parameters measured by modern electromyography (EMG) systems; and (4) compare changes in CMAP parameters during respiration. METHODSThe study group consisted of 29 healthy volunteers (15 men), 21-65 years old (median, 33 years), with no respiratory or neuromuscular disorders. Subjects' data were as follows: height, 160 -192 cm (mean, 174 cm); sternum length, 16 -27 cm (mean, 22 cm); neck circumference, 31-45 cm (mean, 36 cm); chest circumference, 73-119 cm (mean, 90 cm); weight, 49 -105 kg (mean, 69 kg); and body mass index (BMI), 18 -33 kg/m 2 (mean, 23 kg/m 2 ). The subjects were recruited mainly from hospital personnel, and were minimally ...

Physicians taking care of patients with COVID-19 have described different changes in routine blood parameters. However, these changes hinder them from performing COVID-19 diagnoses. We constructed a machine learning model for COVID-19 diagnosis that was based and cross-validated on the routine blood tests of 5333 patients with various bacterial and viral infections, and 160 COVID-19-positive patients. We selected the operational ROC point at a sensitivity of 81.9% and a specificity of 97.9%. The cross-validated AUC was 0.97. The five most useful routine blood parameters for COVID-19 diagnosis according to the feature importance scoring of the XGBoost algorithm were: MCHC, eosinophil count, albumin, INR, and prothrombin activity percentage. t-SNE visualization showed that the blood parameters of the patients with a severe COVID-19 course are more like the parameters of a bacterial than a viral infection. The reported diagnostic accuracy is at least comparable and probably complementary to RT-PCR and chest CT studies. Patients with fever, cough, myalgia, and other symptoms can now have initial routine blood tests assessed by our diagnostic tool. All patients with a positive COVID-19 prediction would then undergo standard RT-PCR studies to confirm the diagnosis. We believe that our results represent a significant contribution to improvements in COVID-19 diagnosis.

Data comparing results and utility of different quantitative electromyographic (EMG) techniques are limited. In the present study, we analyzed the EMG signal from the external anal sphincter (EAS) muscle using three techniques of motor unit potential (MUP) analysis, and a technique of interference pattern (IP) analysis. We examined 56 patients with damage to the cauda equina or conus medullaris, and 64 control subjects. Using manual-MUP and multi-MUP analysis about 20 MUPs, using a single-MUP technique about 10 MUPs, and using turn/amplitude (T/A) analysis about 20 IP samples were obtained. The sensitivities of these techniques in distinguishing neuropathic from control muscles were calculated. The single-MUP technique detected 63%, manual-MUP 57%, and multi-MUP analysis 62% of neuropathic muscles, and MUP parameters obtained by each of these differed significantly from the other. The sensitivity of T/A analysis of IP was 29%. Our results confirm the need for separate MUP normative data for each of the MUP analysis techniques, and favor them over the IP analysis technique. The normative data presented for the EAS muscle should improve and promote quantitative EMG in patients.

Clinical neurophysiologic examination of the pelvic floor is performed worldwide, but there is no consensus on the choice of tests, nor on technical details of individual methods. Standardized methods are, however, necessary to obtain their valid application in different laboratories for the purpose of collection of normative data, comparison of patient data and organization of multi-center studies. It is proposed that in patients with suspected "lower motor neuron" type lesions concentric needle electromyography (CNEMG) is the most informative test to detect pelvic floor denervation/reinnervation, and the external anal sphincter (EAS) muscle is the most appropriate muscle to be examined (either in isolation-when a selective lesion is suspected-or in addition to examination of other muscles). An algorithm consisting of standardized tests including a standardized approach to CNEMG examination of the EAS is presented. The proposed electrophysiologic assessment consists of a computer-assisted analysis of denervation and reinnervation features of the CNEMG signal, a qualitative assessment of reflex and voluntary activation of EAS motor units, and of electrical (or mechanical) elicitation of the bulbocavernosus reflex in those patients in whom manual anogenital stimulation failed to elicit a robust response in the EAS. The proposed protocol could serve as a basis for further studies on validity, sensitivity and specificity of electrophysiologic assessment in patients with different types of "lower motor neuron" involvement of pelvic floor muscles and sacral dysfunction.

No abstract

No abstract

For the external anal sphincter muscle, both normative values and an optimal set of motor unit potential (MUP) parameters have been defined. However, criteria for the diagnosis of neuropathic conditions have not yet been validated. Therefore, in this study, sensitivity was examined in 86 patients with cauda equina lesions (227 muscles), and specificity in 77 controls (119 muscles), using multi-MUP analysis. Six previously defined diagnostic criteria (mean values and outliers for MUP area, duration, and number of turns) were used. An increase in the number of diagnostic criteria required for muscle abnormality (two and three instead of one), and the application of more stringent normative limits resulted in a progressive increase in specificity from 74% to 99% (controls), and a decrease in sensitivity from 70% to 21% (patients). The data suggest that no single cut-off diagnostic criterion has both satisfactory sensitivity and specificity. Introduction of the diagnostic categories of "possible," "probable," and "definite" neuropathic abnormalities into quantitative electromyographic analysis is proposed.