2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00416-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization of anal sphincter electromyography: normative data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
62
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As previous investigators have shown [8,9,11], IP analysis is a feasible technique to study the neuromuscular integrity of the tonically contracting striated muscles of the pelvic floor. Using a similar technique as previous investigators, we demonstrate that the raw IP parameters we obtained for the external anal sphincter appear similar to the previous studies that separately reported them for nulliparous controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previous investigators have shown [8,9,11], IP analysis is a feasible technique to study the neuromuscular integrity of the tonically contracting striated muscles of the pelvic floor. Using a similar technique as previous investigators, we demonstrate that the raw IP parameters we obtained for the external anal sphincter appear similar to the previous studies that separately reported them for nulliparous controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the EMG data using this type of electrode shown on an oscillometer with a speed of 10 ms/div (much faster as compared with a speed of 10-20 s/div in urodynamic study) is known as MUP (Podnar et al, 2000;Podnar, 2007). Those from two wire electrodes inserted in the same position as the anal surface electrode comes from half of the sphincter muscle fibres as whole.…”
Section: Emg Mup and Other Neurophysiologic Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is just like a piece of roasted mutton, and the latter is a long string of roasted mutton. Three quantitative MUP analysis techniques (manual-MUP, single-MUP and multi-MUP), with similar sensitivities for detecting reinnervation changes, are available (Podnar et al, 2000;Podnar, 2007). Normally, potentials generated during sphincter activity may be recorded with a specialized concentric needle electrode inserted directly into the muscle to be tested, and the MUP recorded from the distal urethral sphincter muscle has a biphasic or triphasic waveform with an amplitude of 50 to 300 mV and a firing frequency of 10 to 100 discharges per second.…”
Section: Emg Mup and Other Neurophysiologic Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Technical details of the acquisition protocols used by a particular EMG system should be compared in detail with the system by which reference values were compiled [Podnar et al, 2000b]. Standard ®lter settings (5 Hz±10 kHz), and a concentric EMG needle with a standard recording surface (0.07 mm 2 ), are recommended (and obligatory if published reference data are used) [Podnar et al, 2000b].…”
Section: Standardized Cnemg Examination Of the Eas Musclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases the MUP with the smoothest baseline is retained. MUPs with an unsteady baseline (unclear start/end of the signal) are discarded [Podnar et al, 2000b].…”
Section: Standardized Cnemg Examination Of the Eas Musclementioning
confidence: 99%