Context: The Medicaid program provides health insurance coverage to a diverse set of demographics. We know little about how the policy community describes these populations in places like Medicaid-related websites, public opinion polls, and policy writings, and whether and how these descriptions may affect perceptions of the program, its beneficiaries, and potential policy changes.
Methods: To investigate this issue, we developed and fielded a nationally representative survey of 2,680 Americans that included an experiment that primed respondents by highlighting different combinations of target populations of the Medicaid program as found in the Medicaid policy discourse.
Findings: Overall, we find that Americans view Medicaid and its beneficiaries rather favorably. However, there are marked differences based on partisanship and racial animosity. Emphasizing citizenship and residency requirements at times improved perceptions.
Conclusions: Racial perceptions and partisanship are important correlates in Americans’ views about Medicaid and its beneficiaries. However, perceptions are not immutable. In general, the policy community should shift towards using more comprehensive descriptions of the Medicaid population that go beyond the focus on low income and include citizenship and residency requirements. Future research should expand this work to descriptions in the broader public discourse.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.