Context: Accurate provider directories and whether consumers can schedule timely appointments are crucial determinants of health access and outcomes. We assessed whether consumers can rely on provider directories to find in-network primary care providers, cardiologists, endocrinologists, and gastroenterologists for 2018 and 2019 for all managed care plans in California and whether they can access these providers in a timely manner. Method: We used large, random, and representative surveys of provider directories for all managed care plans in California for four specialties obtained from the California Department of Managed Health Care with a total of 657,012 observations (290,711 for 2018 and 475,524 for 2019). Findings: Surveys were able to verify provider directory entries for the four specialties for 59% to 76% of listings or 78% to 88% of providers reached. Moreover, we found that consumers were able to schedule urgent care appointments for 28% to 54% of listings or 44% to 72% of appropriately listed providers. For general care appointments, the percentages ranged from 35% to 64% of listed providers or 51% to 87% of appropriately listed providers. Differences across markets were generally small related to accuracy. Medi-Cal plans outperformed other markets with regards to timely access. Primary care consistently outperformed all other specialties. Timely access rates were higher for general appointments than for urgent care appointments. Conclusions: Despite the fact that California is one of the most active and well-resourced regulators in the nation, we found concerning results for consumers when it comes to locating in-network providers and gaining timely access. This raises questions about the regulatory regime as well as consumer access and health outcomes.

We assessed provider directory accuracy and timely access in Maryland's Medicaid managed care program, using annual surveys from the annual random and representative provider surveys conducted on behalf of the Maryland Department of Health for 2018 and 2019.Based on 3,262 calls to 2,002 providers in 2018 and 2,739 calls to 2,033 providers in 2019, we found that provider directories are highly inaccurate. Insurance coverage could only be verified for 46% of the listed providers in 2018 and 56% of the listed providers in 2019. Among providers whose insurance participation was verified, beneficiaries were able to schedule timely general care appointments in 90% of verified providers in 2018 and 85% of verified providers in 2019; just over 70% of appointments were scheduled on the first call. The success rate for urgent care appointments was lower but improved substantially once alternative providers were accounted for. Even for verified providers, timely access standards were often not met, particularly for general care. We also note the substantial variation across managed care organizations and across years. Our findings raise concerns from both an enrollee as well as a broader policy perspective. More oversight and enforcement are necessary to guarantee access to care.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract