The aim of this paper is to draw attention to an anonymous set of questions on the De generatione et corruptione, contained in the MSS Erlangen, UB, 213 and Kassel, Stadt-und Landesbibl., Phys. 2° 11, which in my opinion shows doctrines characteristic of the radical Aristotelianism condemned by Etienne Tempier on March 7th, 1277 1 . My contribution is part of a more comprehensive research that I am currently conducting on the reception of the Aristotelian libri naturales in the 13th century 2 . In the first part of the article I will briefly introduce some hypotheses concerning the authorship and the chronology of the anonymous commentary, in the second I will focus on the relation of this work with the condemnation of 1277 and in the third I will recall the main doctrinal features of the commentary.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.