No abstract

There is a growing debate in the literature on whether glucose variability contributes, as well as high HbA1c levels and longstanding diabetes, to the onset and progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetes types 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2). Few data, obtained only by self-monitoring of blood glucose, support this hypothesis. We used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to investigate the association between DR and glucose variability parameters (SD, CONGA 2, MAGE), acute hyperglycemia (HBGI) and chronic exposure to glucose (AG and AUC tot). We studied 68 patients from 19 to 69 years old, 35 with DM1 and 33 with DM2. The prevalence of retinopathy was 43 % in DM 1 patients and 39 % in DM 2 patients. The values of all indicators were obtained by CGM for 72 h. DR was diagnosed on direct or indirect ophthalmoscopic examination, after inducing mydriasis with tropicamide. HbA1c was measured at the baseline and 6 weeks after CGM to test the stability of the patients' glycemic control. Univariate analysis showed a close association between DR and duration of diabetes (OR 1.11; 1.04-1.19), intensive insulin therapy (OR 5.6, CI 1.14-27.30), SD (OR 1.03; CI 1.01-1.06) and CONGA 2 (OR 1.02; CI 1.00-1.04)-both indicators of variability and HBGI (OR 1.1, CI 1.01-1.18)-a parameter reflecting acute hyperglycemia. There was no significant correlation with HbA1c (p = 0.070). Multivariate regression analysis showed that disease duration is the parameter most significantly correlating with DR (OR 1.05; 1.01-1.15). These results reinforce the evidence that longstanding disease is the factor most closely associated with DR. Our data also suggest, however, that glucose variability-regardless of HbA1c-may also have a role as a risk factor for DR, particularly in the case of acute fluctuations (as represented by CONGA 2 and SD) and acute hyperglycemia (as represented by HBGI).

Glucose variability has recently been investigated in diabetic patients in several studies, but most of them considered only a few variability indicators and did not systematically correlate them with patients' HbA1c levels and other important characteristics. In thus study, the correlations between HbA1c levels and metabolic control (average glucose, AG), glucose variability (SD, CONGA, MAGE, MODD, BG ROC), hyperglycemia (HBGI), hypoglycemia (LBGI) and postprandial (AUC PP) indices were investigated in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The study involved 68 patients divided into 3 groups as follows: 35 patients had type 1 diabetes (group 1); 17 had type 2 diabetes and were taking multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin (group 2); and 16 patients had type 2 diabetes treated with OHA and/or basal insulin (group 3). The indicators were obtained over at least 48 h using a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system. HbA1c levels were measured at the baseline and after CGM. HbA1c correlated significantly with AG (r = 0.74), AUC PP (r = 0.69) and HBGI (r = 0.74), but only in type 1 diabetic patients. Patients with longstanding disease and type 1 diabetes had a greater glucose variability, irrespective of their HbA1c levels. Insulin therapy with MDI correlated strongly with HbA1c, but not with glucose variability. HbA1c levels identify states of sustained hyperglycemia and seem to be unaffected by hypoglycemic episodes or short-lived glucose spikes, consequently revealing shortcomings as a "gold standard" indicator of metabolic control. Glucose variability indicators describe the glucose profile of type 1 diabetic patients and identify any worsening glycemic control (typical of longstanding diabetes) more accurately than HbA1c tests.

We examined the effects of 2 months of psyllium treatment in optimizing metabolic control and lipoprotein profile, and its postprandial effects on lipids in type II diabetes. We recruited 40 type II diabetic patients who were on sulfonylureas and a controlled diet, sequentially assigning them to psyllium treatment (G1) or to a control group (G2) treated with dietary measures alone. After 2 months of treatment, body mass index, waist circumference, HbA1c (hemoglobin A1c) and fasting plasma glucose levels had significantly decreased in both groups. There were no postprandial differences in the lipoprotein profile between the two groups. Triglycerides were significantly lower in G1, but not in G2. Our study contributes toward elucidating the effects of psyllium on serum lipids, and suggests that psyllium treatment may help in reducing triglycerides (a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease) in type II diabetic patients.

No abstract