2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00592-012-0391-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of HbA1c and glucose variability in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: outcome of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)

Abstract: Glucose variability has recently been investigated in diabetic patients in several studies, but most of them considered only a few variability indicators and did not systematically correlate them with patients' HbA1c levels and other important characteristics. In thus study, the correlations between HbA1c levels and metabolic control (average glucose, AG), glucose variability (SD, CONGA, MAGE, MODD, BG ROC), hyperglycemia (HBGI), hypoglycemia (LBGI) and postprandial (AUC PP) indices were investigated in patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
56
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that duration of diabetes, diabetic retinopathy [18], and treatment of diabetes (with or without insulin) [19] are related to HbA1c levels, and a relationship with self-efficacy has also been reported [20], [21]. However, in this study, there was no statistical relationship between HbA1c levels 12 weeks after discharge and the total self-efficacy score.…”
Section: Characteristiccontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…It has been suggested that duration of diabetes, diabetic retinopathy [18], and treatment of diabetes (with or without insulin) [19] are related to HbA1c levels, and a relationship with self-efficacy has also been reported [20], [21]. However, in this study, there was no statistical relationship between HbA1c levels 12 weeks after discharge and the total self-efficacy score.…”
Section: Characteristiccontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Sartore et al (9) systematically investigated the relationship between the HbA1c levels and glucose variability indicators using CGM, and found that the HbA1c was not significantly correlated with glucose variability in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Schmitz et al (10) demonstrated that the HbA1c could represent an integrated measurement of sustained hyperglycemia during the previous few months, but could not reflect acute glucose fluctuations and postprandial glycemic variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to one of two different LY2605541 insulinstarting and adjusting algorithms or to GL, but as no differences were noted between the two LY arms (13), the data were combined. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 65 years with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for at least 1 year, had a hemoglobin A 1c (A1C) #10.5%, had a BMI between 19 and 45 kg/m 2 , and had been using metformin and/or a sulfonylurea in combination with GL or NPH insulin administered once daily (maximum dose ,1.0 units/kg/day) for at least 3 months. At enrollment, patients eligible for the main protocol were recruited by investigators to enroll in a protocol substudy that used CGM to evaluate the impact of LY2605541 on glycemic variability and time spent in hypoglycemia compared with GL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%