IMPORTANCE Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for use as a second-line therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who previously received sorafenib. Pembrolizumab has shown substantial antitumor activity and a favorable toxicity profile as a second-line treatment of HCC. However, considering the high cost of pembrolizumab, there is a need to assess its value by considering both the clinical efficacy and cost.OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs placebo as second-line therapy in patients with HCC from the US payer perspective. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime cost and efficacy of pembrolizumab as a second-line treatment of HCC with those of placebo using outcome data from the KEYNOTE-240 randomized placebo-controlled trial, which included 413 patients with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib and randomized patients to receive pembrolizumab plus best supportive care or placebo plus best supportive care in a 2:1 ratio. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESLife-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were estimated at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to account for the parameter of uncertainty. A cost-threshold analysis was also performed. The study was conducted from January 31 to July 29, 2020.

BackgroundInduction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for non-metastatic locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has gained considerable attention. However, the most efficacious IC regimens remain investigational. We aimed to compare the survival benefits of all available IC regimens followed by CCRT in this network meta-analysis.MethodsAll randomized-controlled trials of CCRT with or without IC in non-metastatic locoregionally advanced NPC were included, with an overall nine trials of 2,705 patients counted in the analysis. CCRT alone was the reference category. Eight IC regimens followed by CCRT were analyzed: docetaxel + cisplatin (DC), gemcitabine + carboplatin + paclitaxel (GCP), gemcitabine + cisplatin (GP), mitomycin + epirubicin + cisplatin + fluorouracil + leucovorin (MEPFL), cisplatin + epirubicin + paclitaxel (PET), cisplatin + fluorouracil (PF), cisplatin + capecitabine (PX) and cisplatin + fluorouracil (PF), cisplatin + capecitabine (PX). Fixed-effects frequentist network meta-analysis models was applied and P-score was used to rank the treatments.ResultsDC, GP, and PX were the top three IC regimens with the highest probability of benefit on overall survival (OS). Their corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) (95% CIs) compared with CCRT alone were of 0.24 (0.08–0.73), 0.43 (0.24–0.77), and 0.54 (0.27–1.09) and the respective P-scores were 94%, 82%, and 68%. The first three IC regimens showing significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) were PX, followed by GP and DC with respective HRs of 0.46 (0.24–0.88), 0.51 (0.34–0.77), and 0.49 (0.20–1.20), and P-scores of 82%, 78%, and 74%. Among the studies in the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era, GP and PX were the best performed IC regimens, whilst DC performed the best among non-IMRT studies. Doublet and gemcitabine-based IC regimens had better survival benefits compared to triplet and taxane-based IC regimens, respectively.ConclusionsGiven its consistent superiority in both OS and PFS, DC, GP, and PX ranked among the three most efficacious IC regimens in both the overall and subgroup analysis of IMRT or non-IMRT studies. Exploratory analyses suggested that doublet and gemcitabine-based IC regimens showed better survival performance.

No abstract

Introduction: The prognostic role of plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA clearance when intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM Staging Classification are fully implemented remains undeciphered. We investigated if its half-life clearance during radical treatment for non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) was an early prognosticator. Patients and methods: Patients with previously untreated non-metastatic NPC were prospectively treated with radical IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy +/induction/adjuvant chemotherapy from 2014 to 2018. Their plasma EBV DNA was measured immediately before treatment followed by weekly schedules until 0 copy/ml in two consecutive measurements. Cox regression models were employed to identify prognostic factors. Results: Forty-five patients were prospectively recruited and analyzed. After a median follow-up of 30.3 months, 2 (4.5%), 1 (2.3%), and 6 (13.6%) patients experienced local, regional, and distant relapses, respectively. The median half-life clearance of plasma EBV DNA was 7.92 days. Those with half-life clearance of >15 days had a worse 3-years progression-free survival (PFS) (79.5 vs. 25.0%, p = 0.005), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (85.0 vs. 31.3%, p = 0.009), and overall survival (OS) (91.3 vs. 75.0%, p = 0.024) when compared to those with a shorter half-life. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that only half-life (>15 days) was prognostic of DMFS [HR (95% CI): 4.91 (1.31; 18.39), p = 0.01] and OS [HR (95% CI): 5.24 (1.06; 26.05)] while half-life (>15 days) [HR (95% CI): 5.14 (1.28; 22.73), p = 0.02] and sum of pretreatment gross tumor volumes of the primary nasopharyngeal tumor and the radiologically positive neck nodes (GTV_P+N) [HR (95% CI): 1.01 (1.00; 1.03), p = 0.02] were prognostic of PFS. Chan et al. Kinetics of Plasma EBV DNA Conclusion: The half-life clearance of plasma EBV DNA was prognostic in non-metastatic NPC staged and treated in the contemporary era. Earlier biomarker surveillance during treatment should be considered. Clinical Trial Registration: This study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03830996).

No abstract

4091 Background: Previous studies proposed therapeutic synergy between loco-regional therapies and checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to study the safety and efficacy of sequential transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) followed by Avelumab in patients with locally advanced HCC. Methods: Patients with locally advanced HCC not suitable for curative resections were eligible. All patients had HCC ≥ 5cm, tumor nodules ≤3, and child-Pugh A5-B7 liver function. Tumors with distant metastasis, main portal vein (VP4) invasion, or inferior vena cava (VV3) invasion were excluded. Patients underwent single episode of TACE followed by 5-fraction SBRT (28 days afterwards), followed by Avelumab (10mg per kg) 14 days afterwards and every 2 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was percentage of patients amendable to curative surgery, defined as R0 resection with sufficient remnant liver volume and function. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) version 1.1, survivals, and treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). The sample size assumed that around 20% patients amendable to surgery after experimental treatment compared to 5% of historical institutional results after TACE. Modified Simon two-stage optimal design was used (power, 80%; a = 0.05; P0 = 0.05; P1 = 0.20; n1 = 10; n = 29 with an additional four patients to allow for drop-out or other reasons). Results: Out of 67 patients screened, 33 patients were enrolled. The median sum of diameter of lesion(s) was 15.1cm (range: 5.3-31.1cm), and 21 (63.6%) had marcrovascular invasion (n=13, hepatic vein, n=3 branched portal vein, n=5 both). After a median follow-up of 17.2 months (range: 3.5-31.6 months), 3 (9.1%) patients had tumor downstaged with curative surgery done. The objective response rate was 62.5% (95% CI, 45.3-77.1%), of whom 15 had complete response (CR) (43.8%) and 6 had partial response (18.7%). The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival was 30.3 months (95% CI: 22.7-37.8 months) and 20.7 months (95% CI: 14.6-26.8 months) respectively. All three patients with surgery done were alive at 2 years (100%). For 15 patients had CR, the 2-year OS rate was 92.9% without surgery. Ten patients (30.3%) experienced ≥ grade 3 TRAEs, commonly transient increase in alanine / aspartate aminotransferase (n=4, 12.1%) and bilirubin (n=2, 6%) level after TACE. Five patients (15.2 %) developed ≥ grade 3 immune-related adverse events. Conclusions: Although merely 9% of patients were downstaged to receive curative surgery, combined locoregional treatment and immunotherapy is safe and resulted in an unexpectedly high CR rate of 43% and median OS of 30 months in patients with locally advanced unresectable HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT 03817736.

6524 Background: The prognosis of de novo previously untreated metastatic (M1) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) at diagnosis is poor, and the role of consolidative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to the primary tumor and the neck following first-line palliative chemotherapy remains unknown. We report a phase II study of consolidative IMRT after first-line chemotherapy in previously untreated M1 NPC. Methods: Consolidative IMRT was given in prospectively recruited patients whose previously untreated M1 NPC did not progress after 6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. The primary study objective was overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), regional relapse-free survival (RRFS), response and toxicity. Results: Sixty-nine consecutive patients were enrolled. Sixty-four (92.8%) patients received first-line chemotherapy, of which 8 (12.5%) developed progressive disease and another 8 (12.5%) did not receive IMRT despite non-progression to first-line chemotherapy. The remaining 48 patients whose disease controlled after chemotherapy received IMRT, including 18 (37.5%) who received concurrent chemoradiation. OS was significantly better in those who received IMRT (35.1 versus 14.2 months; P < 0.001), after a median follow-up duration of 3.40 years (range 0.43 years to 12.14 years). PFS, LRFS, and RRFS were also significantly longer in those who received IMRT. Multivariable analyses revealed that IMRT was the only prognostic factor of all survival endpoints. Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 10 (20.8%) patients, mainly mucositis, dysphagia and desquamation. Conclusions: Consolidative IMRT was associated with an OS benefit and favorable tolerability among previously untreated M1 NPC patients who had non-progressive disease following first-line chemotherapy. These results support the rationale to further investigate IMRT as part of the initial treatment in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02476669 .

No abstract