This prospective, randomized, multicenter study shows for the first time that somatostatin analogs, interferon alfa, or the combination of the two had comparable antiproliferative effects in the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors. Response rates were lower compared with those published in previous, nonrandomized studies. The antiproliferative effect of the tested substances was similar for functional and nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors.

No abstract

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has gained wide acceptance as an important, minimally invasive diagnostic tool in gastroenterology, pulmonology, visceral surgery and oncology. This review focuses on data regarding risks and complications of non-interventional diagnostic EUS and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). Measures to improve the safety of EUS und EUS-FNB will be discussed. Due to the specific mechanical properties of echoendoscopes in EUS, there is a low but noteworthy risk of perforation. To minimize this risk, endoscopists should be familiar with the specific features of their equipment and their patients' specific anatomical situations (e.g., tumor stenosis, diverticula). Most diagnostic EUS complications occur during EUS-FNB. Pain, acute pancreatitis, infection and bleeding are the primary adverse effects, occurring in 1% to 2% of patients. Only a few cases of needle tract seeding and peritoneal dissemination have been reported. The mortality associated with EUS and EUS-FNB is 0.02%. The risks associated with EUS-FNB are affected by endoscopist experience and target lesion. EUS-FNB of cystic lesions is associated with an increased risk of infection and hemorrhage. Peri-interventional antibiotics are recommended to prevent cyst infection. Adequate education and training, as well consideration of contraindications, are essential to minimize the risks of EUS and EUS-FNB. Restricting EUS-FNB only to patients in whom the cytopathological results may be expected to change the course of management is the best way of reducing the number of complications.

Clinicians can consider EUS-guided celiac injection and EUS-guided drainage of fluid collections to be safe alternatives to surgical and radiologic interventions. Well-designed prospective trials are needed to assess the risks of EUS-BD and EUS-PD accurately before they are broadly advocated after a failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) of the upper gastrointestinal tract are mainly located in the pancreas, stomach or duodenum. The aims of preoperative work-up are the localization of primary tumour(s), determination of local tumour invasion, of lymph node metastases and of the hormones secreted by the tumour. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) offers ideal conditions to localize and stage NETs of the foregut. We report our results in localizing and staging NETs of the foregut in 40 patients examined between 1990 and 1997 by EUS, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transabdominal ultrasound (US). EUS shows the highest sensitivity in localizing insulinomas compared with SRS, US, CT and MRI. US and EUS should be the first-line diagnostics if insulinoma has been proven by a fasting test. Further diagnostic procedures are unnecessary in most cases. Further diagnostics such as CT or MRI to search for distant metastases are necessary in large tumours or local invasive tumours. EUS shows the highest accuracy to detect or exclude pancreatic gastrinomas, but fails to detect extrapancreatic gastrinomas in about 50%. The combination of EUS and SRS gives additional information. First-line diagnostics in gastrinoma patients should be SRS and CT or MRI. If no metastases are detected, EUS should be the next preoperative imaging procedure. In nonfunctional NETs, EUS provides the best information on local tumor invasion and regional lymph node involvement.

Background: Symptomatic control and occasionally even tumor regression of functional neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system can be achieved by somatostatin analogues. Assuming a dose-dependent antiproliferative effect of somatostatin analogues, we performed a study with the somatostatin analogue lanreotide in ultra-high dosages in patients with progressive, metastatic GEP NET. Patients and Methods: 30 patients with metastatic GEP NET, progressive during treatment with somatostatin analogues (≤1.5 mg/day) and/or interferon-α, underwent ultra-high-dose lanreotide therapy (5 mg lanreotide s.c. three times a day). Tumor growth was evaluated every 3 months. Serum chromogranin A, serum serotonin as well as urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acetic acid levels were also determined at 3-month intervals. In patients with functional tumors, tumor-related symptoms were documented. Results: After a 1-year treatment period with ultra-high-dose lanreotide, 1 complete and 1 partial remission were observed in patients with functional midgut NET. Eleven patients had stable disease and 11 patients showed continuing tumor growth after 3–12 months of treatment. Symptoms decreased significantly during therapy. Conclusions: Our data show that ultra-high-dose lanreotide treatment in patients with metastatic GEP NET can lead to control of both symptoms and proliferation in at least some patients refractory to conventional therapies.

We describe two patients who developed subacute axonal peripheral neuropathy under duodopa treatment. Comprehensive diagnostic workup including muscle and sural nerve biopsy revealed that the most probable cause of subacute axonal peripheral neuropathy was cobalamin and vitamin B6 deficiency in both the patients.

Bei diesem Dokument handelt es sich um die Kurzversion der S2k-Leitlinie Qualitätsanforderungen in der Gastrointestinalen Endoskopie, welche über die folgenden Seiten zugänglich ist: ▶ DGVS (www.dgvs.de) ▶ AWMF (www.leitlinien.net) Die Langversion der Leitlinie, die auch den Leitlinienreport enthält, ist ebenfalls über diese Seiten verfügbar oder kann über www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/journal/10.1055/s-00000094 abgerufen werden. Die Leitlinie wurde unter Federführung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie (DGVS) unter Beteiligung der Deutsche Morbus Crohn/Colitis ulcerosa Vereinigung e. V (DCCV), der Deutsche Gesellschaft für Endoskopie und Bildgebende Verfahren (DGE-BV), der Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein-und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV), der Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Endoskopie und Sonografie (CAES), des Berufsverband niedergelassener Gastroenterologen Deutschlands e. V. (bng), der Deutsche Gesellschaft für Thrombose und Hämostaseforschung und der Deutsche Gesellschaft für Endoskopie -Assistenzpersonal e. V. (DEGEA) erstellt.