No abstract

Aims To investigate changes in corneal nerve morphology in Type 2 diabetes and to establish relationships between in vivo corneal confocal microscopy and markers of peripheral nerve structure and function.Participants and methods We recruited 57 participants with Type 2 diabetes and 26 healthy controls of similar age and sex distribution. We also recruited a disease control group of 54 participants with Type 1 diabetes. All participants were assessed for distal symmetrical polyneuropathy using the Total Neuropathy Score. In vivo corneal confocal microscopy was used to assess corneal nerve fibre length, corneal nerve fibre density, corneal nerve branch density and inferior whorl length. Peripheral nerve structure was assessed using median nerve ultrasonography. Large fibre function was assessed according to median nerve axonal excitability. Small fibre function was assessed using Sudoscan TM and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms.Results Corneal nerve fibre length, fibre density and branch density and inferior whorl length were significantly lower in individuals with Type 2 diabetes compared to controls (P<0.001 for all). In the Type 2 diabetes cohort, correlations were observed between neuropathy severity and corneal nerve fibre density (P=0.004), corneal nerve branch density (P=0.003), corneal nerve fibre length (P=0.002) and inferior whorl length (P=0.01). Significant correlations were observed between corneal confocal outcomes and axonal excitability measurements. No association was found between corneal confocal microscopy and median nerve cross-sectional area, Sudoscan measurements or the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms.Conclusions This study demonstrated significant changes in corneal nerves in individuals with Type 2 diabetes. Reductions in corneal nerve measures correlated with increasing neuropathy severity. Associations were found between corneal confocal microscopy and markers of voltage-gated potassium channel function.

No abstract

The PMD index appeared to be highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing PMD. Asphericity and Avg NT((D))/IS((D)) were clinically relevant in discriminating PMD from other groups.

No abstract

No abstract

Isolation of antimicrobial-resistant microbes from ocular infections may be becoming more frequent. Infections caused by these microbes can be difficult to treat and lead to poor outcomes. However, new therapies are being developed which may help improve clinical outcomes. This review examines recent reports on the isolation of antibiotic-resistant microbes from ocular infections. In addition, an overview of the development of some new antibiotic therapies is given. The recent literature regarding antibiotic use and resistance, isolation of antibiotic-resistant microbes from ocular infections and the development of potential new antibiotics that can be used to treat these infections was reviewed. Ocular microbial infections are a global public health issue as they can result in vision loss which compromises quality of life. Approximately 70 per cent of ocular infections are caused by bacteria including Chlamydia trachomatis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and fungi such as Candida albicans, Aspergillus spp. and Fusarium spp. Resistance to first-line antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones and azoles has increased, with resistance of S. aureus isolates from the USA to fluoroquinolones reaching 32 per cent of isolates and 35 per cent being methicillin-resistant (MRSA). Lower levels of MRSA (seven per cent) were isolated by an Australian study. Antimicrobial peptides, which are broad-spectrum alternatives to antibiotics, have been tested as possible new drugs. Several have shown promise in animal models of keratitis, especially treating P. aeruginosa, S. aureus or C. albicans infections. Reports of increasing resistance of ocular isolates to mainstay antibiotics are a concern, and there is evidence that for ocular surface disease this resistance translates into worse clinical outcomes. New antibiotics are being developed, but not by large pharmaceutical companies and mostly in university research laboratories and smaller biotech companies. Antimicrobial peptides show promise in treating keratitis.

No abstract