Background Accurate prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) is very important for the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. We aimed to construct an effective prognostic nomogram for individualized risk estimates of MACEs for patients with ACS after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods This was a prospective study of patients with ACS after PCI from January 2013 to July 2019 (n = 2465). After removing patients with incomplete clinical information, a total of 1986 patients were randomly divided into evaluation (n = 1324) and validation (n = 662) groups. Predictors included in the nomogram were determined by a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model based on the training set. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves were used to assess the discrimination and predictive accuracy of the nomogram, which were then compared with those of the classic models. The clinical utility of the nomogram was assessed by X-tile analysis and Kaplan–Meier curve analysis. Results Independent prognostic factors, including lactate level, age, left anterior descending branch stenosis, right coronary artery stenosis, brain natriuretic peptide level, and left ventricular ejection fraction, were determined and contained in the nomogram. The nomogram achieved good areas under the ROC curve of 0.712–0.762 in the training set and 0.724–0.818 in the validation set and well-fitted calibration curves. In addition, participants could be divided into two risk groups (low and high) according to this model. Conclusions A simple-to-use nomogram incorporating lactate level effectively predicted 6-month, 1-year, and 4-year MACE incidence among patients with ACS after PCI.

Background:The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII; neutrophil × platelet/lymphocyte) is a novel marker for immune and inflammatory status and is associated with adverse prognosis in cardiovascular disease. Methods: In total, 744 patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were included in our study, received standard therapies, and were followed up. Patients were divided into high and low SII groups according to the baseline SII. The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. Results: During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, a total of 185 (24.9%) MACEs were recorded. Analysis of the ROC curve revealed that the best cutoff value of SII was 1159.84×10 9 /L for predicting MACEs. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that those patients in the low SII group had higher survival rates than those in the high SII group (p < 0.001). Compared to those in the low SII group, patients in the high SII group were at significantly higher risk of MACEs (134 (38.8%) vs 51 (12.8%), p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that a high SII level was independently associated with MACEs in ACS patients with CKD (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.865, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.197-2.907, p = 0.006). Conclusion:The present study showed that an elevated SII is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in ACS with CKD patients, suggesting that SII may be a valuable predictor of poor prognosis in ACS with CKD patients. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Background: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) improve outcomes in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. However, the lack of evidence regarding long-term clinical outcomes in the use of MRA, including spironolactone, in patients with AMI combined with CKD.Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether spironolactone could significantly reduce the risk of all-cause mortality and re-admission in patients with AMI and CKD.Methods: In this single center, observational, retrospective, registry based clinical study, a total of 2,465 AMI patients were initially screened; after excluding patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate more than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, 360 patients in the standard treatment group and 200 patients in the spironolactone group met the criteria. All enrolled patients follow-up for 30 months. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and re-admission. The key safety outcome was hyperkalemia rates during the 30 months follow-up period.Results: 160 (44.4%) and 41 (20.5%) patients in the standard treatment and spironolactone groups died, respectively [hazard ratio (HR): 0.389; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.276–0.548; p &lt; 0.001]. Re-admission occurred in 217 (60.3%) and 95 (47.5%) patients in the standard treatment and spironolactone groups, respectively (HR: 0.664; 95% CI: 0.522–0.846; p = 0.004). The spironolactone group was divided into two based on the daily dose, low dose group (no more than 40 mg) and high dose group (more than 40 mg); the differences in the mortality rate between low dose group (16.7%) and the standard treatment group (44.4%) (HR: 0.309; 95% CI: 0.228–0.418; p &lt; 0.001) and high dose group (34.1%) (HR: 0.429; 95% CI: 0.199–0.925; p = 0.007) were significant. The differences in re-hospitalization rate between low dose group (43.6%) and the standard treatment group (60.3%) (HR: 0.583; 95% CI: 0.457–0.744; p &lt; 0.001) and high dose group (61.4%) (HR: 0.551; 95% CI: 0.326–0.930; p = 0.007) was significant. Hyperkalemia occurred in 18 (9.0%) and 18 (5.0%) patients in the spironolactone group and standard treatment group, respectively (HR: 1.879; 95% CI: 0.954–3.700; p = 0.068). Whereas, Hyperkalemia occurred in high dose group (20.5%) significantly more often than in the standard treatment group (p &lt; 0.001) and low dose group (5.8%) (p = 0.003).Conclusion: Using MRA, such as spironolactone, may substantially reduce the risk of both all-cause mortality and re-admission in patients with AMI and CKD; the use of low-dose spironolactone has the best efficacy and safety. However, this was a relatively small sample size, single center, observational, retrospective, registry based clinical study and further prospective evaluation in adequately powered randomized trials were needed before further use of spironolactone in AMI with CKD population.

Background With the establishment of the cardiac-gut axis concept, increasing evidence has suggested the involvement and important regulatory role of the gut microbiota (GM) in cardiovascular diseases. Whereas, the relationship between GM and atrial fibrillation (AF) still poorly understood.Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate whether there were differences in GM between AF patients and healthy controls, and to discover the factors that affecting the changes of GM.Methods In this study, we enrolled 30 hospitalized patients with AF and 30 matched patients with sinus rhythm (SR). GM species in fecal samples were evaluated through amplicon sequencing targeting the 16Sribosomal RNA gene. GM species richness, diversity, differential abundance of individual taxa between AF and SR were analyzed.Results AF patients showed decreased species richness and α-diversity compared to SR patients, but there was no statistical difference. The phylogenetic diversity was significant decreased in AF group (P<0.001). The β-diversity indexes revealed significant differences in GM community structure between AF group and SR group. After investigated the individual taxa, AF group showed altered relative abundance in several taxa compared to the SR group. linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) analysis revealed, a significant decrease in Bifidobacterium and a greater abundance of Lactobacillus, Fusobacterium, Haemophilus in AF group compared with the SR group.Conclusions In AF patients, the GM phylogenetic diversity and β-diversity decreased, the relative abundance altered in several taxa and the bacterial community structure changed. GM dysbiosis might play a crucial part in the occurrence and development of AF.Clinical Trial Registration: chictr.org.cn identifier: ChiCTR2100050063

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of thrombus aspiration (TA) strategy on the outcomes and its interaction with D-dimer levels in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in “real-world” settings.Materials and Methods: This study included 1,295 patients with STEMI who had undergone primary PCI with or without TA between January 2013 and June 2017. Patients were first divided into a TA+PCI group and a PCI-only group, and the baseline characteristics and long-term mortality between the two groups were analyzed. Furthermore, we studied the effect of TA on the clinical outcomes of patients grouped according to quartiles of respective D-dimer levels. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were new-onset heart failure (HF), rehospitalization, re-PCI, and stroke.Results: In the original cohort, there were no significant differences in all-cause mortality between the TA+PCI and PCI-only groups (hazard ratio, 0.789; 95% confidence interval, 0.556–1.120; p = 0.185). After a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, the all-cause mortality rates of patients in the TA + PCI and PCI-only groups were 8.5 and 16.2%, respectively. Additionally, differences between the two groups in terms of the risk of HF, re-PCI, rehospitalization, and stroke were non-significant. However, after dividing into quartiles, as the D-dimer levels increased, the all-cause mortality rate in the PCI group gradually increased (4.3 vs. 6.0 vs. 7.0 vs. 14.7%, p &lt; 0.001), while the death rate in the TA+PCI group did not significantly differ (4.6 vs. 5.0 vs. 4.0 vs. 3.75%, p = 0.85). Besides, in the quartile 3 (Q3) and quartile 4 (Q4) groups, the PCI-only group was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality than that of the TA+PCI group (Q3: 4.0 vs. 7.0%, p = 0.029; Q4: 3.75 vs. 14.7%, p &lt; 0.001). Moreover, the multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that TA is inversely associated with the primary outcome in the Q4 group [odds ratio (OR), 0.395; 95% CI, 0.164–0.949; p = 0.038].Conclusions: The findings of our real-world study express that routine manual TA during PCI in STEMI did not improve clinical outcomes overall. However, patients with STEMI with a higher concentration of D-dimer might benefit from the use of TA during primary PCI. Large-scale studies are recommended to confirm the efficacy of TA.