BackgroundThe ability to select an action by considering both delays and amount of reward outcome is critical for maximizing long-term benefits. Although previous animal experiments on impulsivity have suggested a role of serotonin in behaviors requiring prediction of delayed rewards, the underlying neural mechanism is unclear.Methodology/Principal FindingsTo elucidate the role of serotonin in the evaluation of delayed rewards, we performed a functional brain imaging experiment in which subjects chose small-immediate or large-delayed liquid rewards under dietary regulation of tryptophan, a precursor of serotonin. A model-based analysis revealed that the activity of the ventral part of the striatum was correlated with reward prediction at shorter time scales, and this correlated activity was stronger at low serotonin levels. By contrast, the activity of the dorsal part of the striatum was correlated with reward prediction at longer time scales, and this correlated activity was stronger at high serotonin levels.Conclusions/SignificanceOur results suggest that serotonin controls the time scale of reward prediction by differentially regulating activities within the striatum.
Behavioral disinhibition in Go/No-Go task is thought to be associated with impulsiveness in humans. Recent imaging studies showed that neural circuits involving diverse areas of the frontal cortex and other association cortex sites such as the parietal cortex are implicated in the inhibition of response during No-Go trials. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between regional cerebral activation during No-Go trials and impulsiveness. Seventeen right-handed healthy volunteers participated in the study. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure the brain activation during a Go/No-Go task. The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, 11(th) version (BIS-11) was used to measure impulsiveness. Activated regions included the right middle frontal gyrus and the inferior parietal lobe, which is consistent with previous neuroimaging studies. A negative correlation was observed between the motor impulsiveness of BIS-11 and No-Go-related activation in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (RDLPFC). Our results suggest that the RDLPFC is the area most sensitive to differences in individual motor impulsiveness and its activity may be an indicator of the individual capacity for response inhibition.
We herein report a 28-year-old woman with a follicular neoplasm showing subcutaneous needle tract implantation. One month after fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for a tumor measuring 2.5 cm, the patient became aware of a subcutaneous nodule measuring about 1 cm at the needle insertion site. FNAB smear of this nodule showed poorly cohesive clusters of follicular cells with nuclear crowding, overlapping and resetting with some microfollicular architecture. Total thyroidectomy and resection of the subcutaneous nodule were performed. Although there was no capsular or vascular invasion of the nodule, the lesion was diagnosed as follicular carcinoma because of the subcutaneous seeding. Ki-67 labeling indices of the thyroid nodule and implanted tumor were higher than 5%. Furthermore, although galectin-3 was completely negative in the thyroid nodule, it was heterogeneously positive in the implanted tumor. It is therefore suggested that high cell proliferating activity as a characteristic of the original nodule and the subsequently obtained invasive characteristic of the implanted tumor contributed to this event. To date, there has not been any recurrence of the implanted lesion. Because implanted follicular carcinoma can be surgically removed, this complication should not impair the usefulness of FNAB.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.