Objective: Although adult cochlear implant (CI) outcomes have primarily focused on speech recognition scores, the rigorous development of a CI-specific patient-reported outcome measure provides an opportunity for a more comprehensive and ecologically valid approach to measure the real-world functional abilities of adult CI users. Here, we report for the first time normative Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and global scores and variance for a large, multi-institutional sample of adult CI users. Study Design: Cross-sectional study design. Setting: CI centers in the United States. Patients: Seven hundred five adults with bilateral moderate to profound hearing loss with at least 1 year of CI use. Intervention(s): Cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measure(s): CIQOL-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global scores. Results: During the development of the CIQOL instruments, 1,000 CI users from all regions of the United States were invited to participate in studies. Of these, 705 (70.5%) completed all portions of the study, and their data are reported here. Mean CIQOL domain scores were highest (indicating better function) for the emotional and social domains and lowest for listening effort. The entertainment and social domains demonstrated the widest distribution of scores and largest standard deviations, indicating greatest variability in function. Overall, there were minimal ceiling and floor effects for all domains. Conclusion: Normative scores from a large sample of experienced adult CI users are consistent with clinical observations, showing large differences in functional abilities and large variability. Normative CIQOL data for adult CI users have the potential to enhance preoperative discussions with CI candidates, improve post-CI activation monitoring, and establish standards for CI centers.

Objective To perform a systematic review of proposed sinus computed tomography (CT) scoring systems and determine their association with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Data Sources PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Review Methods A systematic search was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) for studies describing CT scores and PROMs in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Results A total of 144 studies were included. Out of 20,741 patients, 53.6% were male and 55.5% had nasal polyposis. A meta-analysis of correlations revealed a moderate correlation between Lund-McKay (LM) and the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22; r = 0.434, P < .001) and a weaker correlation between LM and the 20-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20; r = 0.257, P = .039). Meta-regression also revealed a weak association between LM and SNOT-20 (n = 25 studies) but no significant associations between Zinreich score and SNOT-22 or LM scores and PROMs, including SNOT-22 (n = 94 studies), Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (n = 25), nasal obstruction visual analog scale (n = 15), Chronic Sinusitis Survey (n = 12), Total Nasal Symptom Score (n = 4), Total Symptom Score (n = 3), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (n = 3). Conclusion There is essentially little association between radiologic grade and PROMs. CT grading systems with improved clinical utility are needed.

ImportancePrevious research suggests that clinicians view realistic patient expectations as the most important nonaudiological factor in the decision to proceed with a cochlear implant (CI). However, clinicians have few data to determine whether patients’ outcome expectations are realistic.ObjectiveTo address this unmet clinical need through the development and psychometric analysis of a new patient-reported outcome measure, the CI Quality of Life (CIQOL) Expectations.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary CI center from February 26, 2020, to August 31, 2021. First, a team comprising 2 CI audiologists, a CI surgeon, a hearing scientist, and 2 psychometricians with experience in instrument development converted all items from the CIQOL-35 Profile instrument into statements reflecting expected outcomes. Then, cognitive interviews with 20 potential CI users assessed the clarity and comprehensiveness of the new instrument. Next, responses to the CIQOL-Expectations instrument for 131 potential adult CI candidates were psychometrically analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Finally, degree to which patient expectations changed from before to after and their CI evaluation appointments was measured.InterventionThe CIQOL-Expectations instrument.ResultsOf 178 participants, 85 (47.8%) were female, and there was 1 (0.6%) Asian, 26 (14.6%) Black or African American, 1 (0.6%) Latinx, and 150 (84.3%) White individuals. No major content or grammar changes were identified during the cognitive interviews. Overall, all CIQOL domains demonstrated adequate to strong psychometric properties. Several domains did not meet all a priori established indicators of model fit or ability to separate CI users based on response patterns, but all met most indicators. Potential CI users demonstrated the highest mean (SD) expectation scores for the environment (70.2 [20.8]) and social (68.4 [18.0]) domains. In addition, the entertainment (20 [15.3%]) and environment (31 [24.4%]) domains had the highest percentage of patients with expectation scores of 100. Yet, normative CIQOL-35 Profile data from experienced CI users suggested few patients obtain this high degree of functional benefit after implant.Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cross-sectional study suggest that the CIQOL-Expectations instrument may provide an opportunity to assess potential CI users’ expected outcomes using modification of an established CIQOL instrument and a patient-centered framework. The included items and domains reflect real-world functional abilities valued by CI users and may provide opportunities for an evidence-based shared decision-making approach to the CI evaluation process. With this instrument, clinicians can compare individual patients’ pre-CI outcome expectations with established normative data and provide appropriate counseling.

Background: While various sinus computed tomography (CT) scoring systems have been proposed and used in the literature, no single system has been identified as superior. The strength of associations between CT scoring systems and measures of olfaction also remains unclear.Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies that reported both CT scores and measures of olfaction in a cross-sectional manner were included. Results: A total of 37 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Of 8035 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, 55.6% were male patients and 53.2% had chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Analysis by meta-regression was performed of Lund-Mackay (LM) versus Smell Identification Test-40 (SIT-40; 12 studies), Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT; 10 studies), Sniffin' Sticks (SS; 10 studies), and Toyota & Takagi (T&T) olfactometry (four studies). A significant moderate association was found between LM and SIT-40 (R 2 = 0.612, p < 0.001) and LM and SS (R 2 = 0.612, p < 0.001). An association between LM and BSIT approached significance (R 2 = 0.461, p = 0.054). No significant associations were noted between LM and T&T olfactometry and between LM and SS when stratified by nasal polyp status. Conclusion: There is a significant moderate association of current CT scoring systems to SIT-40 and SS. Further research should focus on associations of objective measures of olfaction to CT scores of the nasal cavity, sinuses, and olfactory cleft, as well as other disease markers.

No abstract

Objective: The use of computer-based auditory training (CBAT) after cochlear implantation is associated with improved speech recognition and real-world functional abilities. However, patient-related factors associated with CBAT use remain unknown. This study seeks to identify such factors and recognize those at risk for not implementing CBAT. Study Design: Prospective natural experiment. Setting: Tertiary academic center. Patients: A total of 117 new adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients with bilateral moderate-to-profound hearing loss. Interventions/Main Outcome Measures: Patient demographic and lifestyle information, preimplantation aided speech recognition scores, Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) domain and global scores, CIQOL-Expectations scores, and CBAT use in the first 3 months after activation. Patient-related variables included age, sex, race, duration of hearing loss before implantation, hours of CI use per day, hearing-aid use before implantation, living arrangements/marital status, annual household income, employment, technology use, and education. Results: Overall, 33 new CI users (28.2%) used CBAT in the first 3 months after activation. On bivariate analysis of the pre-CI CIQOL scores, CIQOL-Expectations score, aided speech recognition scores, and demographic/lifestyle factors examined, regular use of smartphone, tablet, or computer technology was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of CBAT use (odds ratio, 9.354 [1.198-73.020]), whereas higher CIQOL-Expectations emotional domain scores were associated with a lower likelihood of CBAT use (d = −0.69 [−1.34 to −0.05]). However, using multivariable analysis to control for potential confounding factors revealed no significant associations between CBAT use in the first 3 months after cochlear implantation and any examined factor. Conclusions: No associations between patient demographic, lifestyle, or pre-CI speech recognition and patient-reported outcome measures and CBAT use were identified. Therefore, discussions with all patients after implantation on the availability of CBAT and its potential benefits are warranted. In addition, given the limited overall use of CBAT and its association with improved CI outcomes, future studies are needed to investigate facilitators and barriers to CBAT use.

No abstract

Objective Children with hypopituitarism (CwHP) can present with orofacial clefting, frequently in the setting of multiple midline anomalies. Hypopituitarism (HP) can complicate medical and surgical care; the perioperative risk in CwHP during the traditionally lower risk cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) repair is not well described. The objective of this study is to examine the differences in complications and mortality of CL/P repair in CwHP compared to children without hypopituitarism (CwoHP). Design A retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Setting The 1997 to 2019 Kids’ Inpatient Databases (KID). Patients Children 3 years old and younger who underwent CL/P repair. Main Outcome Measure(s) Complications and mortality. Results A total of 34 106 weighted cases were analyzed, with 86 having HP. CwHP had a longer length of stay (3.0 days [IQR 2.0-10.0] vs 1.0 day [IQR 1.0-2.0], P < .001) and higher rates of complications and mortality (12.8% vs 2.9%, P < .001) compared to CwoHP. Controlling for demographic factors, CwHP had 6.61 higher odds of complications and mortality than CwoHP (95% CI 3.38-12.94, P < .001). Conclusions CwHP can present with a CL/P and other midline defects that can increase the complexity of their care. These data show a significant increase in length of stay, complications, and mortality in CwHP undergoing CL/P repair. Increased multidisciplinary attention and monitoring may be needed for these children peri- and postoperatively, especially if additional comorbidities are present. Further studies on perioperative management in this population are warranted to reduce morbidity and mortality.