Background: Fixed appliances have been the mainstream for orthodontic treatment, while clear aligners, such as Invisalign system, have become increasingly popular. The prevalence of apical root resorption (ARR) in patients with clear aligners is still controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the prevalence and severity of ARR in patients treated with clear aligners and fixed appliances using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: A total of 373 roots from 70 subjects, with similar baseline characteristics and the ABO discrepancy index scores (i.e., treatment difficulty), were included into two groups: the clear aligners group (Invisalign, Align Technology, California, USA) and fixed appliances group (Victory Series; 3 M Unitek, California, USA). Root length of each anterior tooth was measured on the CBCT images by two blinded investigators. The ARR on each tooth was calculated as the difference of root length before and after orthodontic treatment. Chi-square test and paired t test was used to compare the ARR between the two groups as well as before and after orthodontic treatments. Results: Prevalence of ARR in the clear aligners group (56.30%) was significantly lower than that in the fixed appliances group (82.11%) (P < 0.001). The severity of ARR in the clear aligners group (0.13 ± 0.47 mm) was significantly less than that in the fixed appliances group (1.12 ± 1.34 mm) (P < 0.001). The most severe ARR was found on the maxillary canine (1.53 ± 1.92 mm) and lateral incisor (1.31 ± 1.33 mm) in the fixed appliances group; the least ARR was found on the mandibular canine (− 0.06 ± 0.47 mm) and lateral incisor (0.04 ± 0.48 mm) in the clear aligners group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The prevalence and severity of ARR measured on CBCT in patients with clear aligners were less than those in patients with fixed appliances.

No abstract

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different implant morphologies and immediate provisionalization options on the change of implant stability.Methods94 Patients were randomized to receive implants from Straumann® BL/Straumann® BLT/Astra OsseoSpeed® TX, meanwhile having the same opportunity to receive healing abutment or immediate provisionalization. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and marginal bone loss (MBL) were recorded at following timepoints. Parametric statistic was used for data analysis.ResultsData showed that ISQ and MBL values of conical/straight/straight with micro-thread neck implants had no significant difference.DiscussionImmediate provisionalization options could move the dip point of ISQ values ahead or delayed around one week, which were also relevant to implant systems. MBL values were proved to be unaffected by both two factors mentioned above.

No abstract

Congenital and developmental craniofacial deformities often cause bone defects, misalignment, and soft tissue asymmetry, which can lead to facial function and morphologic abnormalities, especially among children born with cleft lip and palate. Joint efforts from oral maxillofacial surgery, oral implantology, and cosmetic surgery are often required for diagnosis and treatment. As one of the most widely performed treatment methods, implant-supported cranio-maxillofacial prostheses have been widely applied in the course of treatment. Therefore, stability of peri-implant bone tissue is crucial for the long-term success of treatment and patients’ quality of life. The circadian clock component brain and muscle aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like protein 1 (BMAL1) was found to be involved in the cell fate of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, which were essential in the fixation of titanium implants. This study aimed to investigate the effect of BMAL1 on osteogenesis in osseointegration, providing a brand new solution to increase bone implant conjunction efficiency and implant stability, paving the way for a long-term satisfactory therapy outcome.