PurposeTo investigate the frequencies, trends, and in vitro drug susceptibilities of the causative pathogens in microbial keratitis in Manchester Royal Eye Hospital.Patients and methodsCorneal scrape results recorded by the microbiology service between 2004 and 2015 were extracted from an established database. A total of 4229 corneal scrape specimens were identified from an established database. First-line antibiotic treatment in our centre during the study period was ofloxacin and second line was cefuroxime and gentamicin.ResultsMean age was 45.9±21.0. A total of 1379 samples (32.6%) were culture positive. One hundred forty-eight (10.7%) specimens cultured multiple organisms. Of the 1539 organisms identified, 63.3% were Gram-positive bacteria, 27.3% Gram-negative bacteria, 7.1% fungi, and 2.3% Acanthamoebae. A decreasing trend in Gram-positive isolates was found together with a stable trend in Gram negatives and an increasing trend in Acanthamoeba and fungi. There appeared to be a significant increasing trend of Moraxella infection (P=0.001). In all, 83.1 and 90.8% of Gram-positive and -negative isolates tested were susceptible to ofloxacin, respectively. Cefuroxime covered 86.6% of Gram-positive and 61.4% of Gram-negative isolates, whereas gentamicin covered 88.8 and 96.5% of Gram-positive and -negative isolates, respectively.ConclusionWe found a change in the type of Gram-negative organisms isolated over time, with the Moraxella species on the rise. Reassuringly, no significant increase in resistance was observed in vitro for any of the commonly used antibiotics. Ofloxacin remains a good first-line antibiotic treatment but duo-therapy does have broader coverage and should be considered in non-responsive cases.
PurposeTo report the efficacy, safety profile, and postoperative management of XEN45 implant at 12-month follow-up.Patients and methodsThis was a retrospective, non-randomised interventional case series involving patients who underwent XEN45 implantation by a single, experienced glaucoma specialist in a tertiary centre. Primary outcome measures were the intraocular pressure (IOP) and the number of medications at 1-year follow-up visit. Two IOP criteria were chosen to measure success: IOP ≤21 mm Hg and ≥20% reduction from baseline (criteria one); and IOP ≤15 mm Hg and ≥30% reduction from baseline (criteria two).ResultsAll 39 eyes completed 1-year follow-up. The mean preoperative IOP was 24.9±7.8 mm Hg on three drops, which reduced to 14.5±3.4 mm Hg at month 12 (P<0.005) on 0.7 drops (P<0.005). On the basis of criteria one, the cumulative probability of success at 1 year was 87.0% without medication and 92.0% with medication. On the basis of criteria two, cumulative probability of success was 62.0% without medication and 64.0% with medication. Bleb intervention with a median of 2 (range 1-4) was required for 51.3% of eyes. Implant was obstructed by iris tissue in three eyes (7.7%); one eye (2.6%) developed hyphaema; eight eyes (20.5%) had numerical hypotony (IOP≤5 mm Hg) at day 1, of which all spontaneously resolved by week 4 apart from one eye.ConclusionsThe XEN45 implant proved to be an effective treatment with a good safety profile at 1-year follow-up period. The high rate of postoperative bleb intervention does not make XEN45 a 'fit-and-forget' procedure and therefore the procedure should ideally be performed by surgeons experienced in bleb management.
Metabolomics is the study of endogenous and exogenous metabolites in biological systems, which aims to provide comparative semi-quantitative information about all metabolites in the system. Metabolomics is an emerging and potentially powerful tool in ophthalmology research. It is therefore important for health professionals and researchers involved in the speciality to understand the basic principles of metabolomics experiments. This article provides an overview of the experimental workflow and examples of its use in ophthalmology research from the study of disease metabolism and pathogenesis to identification of biomarkers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.