BACKGROUND: The Valsalva maneuver is normally accompanied by relaxation of the levator ani muscle, which stretches around the presenting part, but in some women the maneuver is accompanied by levator ani muscle contraction, which is referred to as levator ani muscle coactivation. The effect of such coactivation on labor outcome in women undergoing induction of labor has not been previously assessed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of levator ani muscle coactivation on labor outcome, in particular on the duration of the second and active second stage of labor, in nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor. STUDY DESIGN: Transperineal ultrasound was used to measure the anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus, both at rest and at maximum Valsalva maneuver, in a group of nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor in 2 tertiary-level university hospitals. The correlation between anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus values and levator ani muscle coactivation with the mode of delivery and various labor durations was assessed. RESULTS: In total, 138 women were included in the analysis. Larger anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus at Valsalva was associated with a shorter second stage (r ¼ e0.230, P ¼ .021) and active second stage (r ¼ e0.338, P ¼ .001) of labor. Women with levator ani muscle coactivation had a significantly longer active second stage duration (60 AE 56 vs 28 AE 16 minutes, P < .001). Cox regression analysis, adjusted for maternal age and epidural analgesia, demonstrated an independent significant correlation between levator ani muscle coactivation and a longer active second stage of labor (hazard ratio, 2.085; 95% confidence interval, 1.158e3.752; P ¼ .014). There was no significant difference between women who underwent operative delivery (n ¼ 46) when compared with the spontaneous vaginal delivery group (n ¼ 92) as regards anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus at rest and at Valsalva maneuver, nor in the prevalence of levator ani muscle coactivation (10/46 vs 15/92; P ¼ .49). CONCLUSION: Levator ani coactivation is associated with a longer active second stage of labor.

Objective Abnormal placental invasion is more common after an elective Cesarean delivery, suggesting that prelabor Cesarean section (CS) increases the likelihood of the CS scar being above the internal cervical os and predisposing to a scar pregnancy in the future. The aim of this study was to assess the location and integrity of the CS scar in postpartum women delivered by CS at different stages of labor. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of women at term who underwent a CS for the first time. In all women, cervical dilatation was determined by digital examination at the time of the CS. All patients had a transvaginal ultrasound examination to assess the location of the CS scar in relation to the internal cervical os, as well as the presence of a scar niche. Results A total of 407 pregnant women were recruited into the study: 103 with cervical dilatation ≤ 2 cm, 261 with cervical dilatation 3–7 cm and 43 with cervical dilatation ≥ 8 cm at the time of the CS. A statistically significant correlation was observed between cervical dilatation at the time of the CS and the position of the CS scar. The scar was positioned in the uterus above the internal cervical os in 97.1% (100/103) of women delivered at a cervical dilatation of 0–2 cm, whereas the scar was located at or below the internal cervical os in 97.7% (42/43) of cases delivered at a cervical dilatation of 8–10 cm (P < 0.001). A uterine‐scar defect (niche) was observed in 38.1% (64/168) of women with the scar located above, compared with 18.0% (43/239) of those with the scar situated at or below, the internal cervical os (P < 0.001). Conclusions Prelabor and early‐labor Cesarean delivery are associated with an increased prevalence of a scar in the uterine cavity as well as a scar niche. CS in late labor is associated with the uterine scar being situated in the endocervical canal and with a lower incidence of a niche. The position and integrity of the CS scar after prelabor and early‐labor Cesarean delivery explain the predisposition to abnormal placental invasion in subsequent pregnancy. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

BACKGROUND: Induction of labor is one of the most common interventions in modern obstetrics, and its frequency is expected to continue to increase. There is inconsistency as to how failed induction of labor is defined; however, the majority of studies define success as the achievement of vaginal delivery. Induction of labor in nulliparous women poses an additional challenge with a 15% to 20% incidence of failure, ending in emergency operative deliveries. The Bishop score has been traditionally used before decisions for induction of labor. Nonetheless, it is subjective and prone to marked interobserver variation. Several studies have been conducted to find alternative predictors, yet a reliable, objective method still remains to be introduced and validated. Hence, there is still a need for the development of new predictive tools to facilitate informed decision making, optimization of resources, and minimization of potential risks of failure. Furthermore, a peripartum transperineal ultrasound scan has been proven to provide objective, noninvasive assessment of labor. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of developing and validating an objective and reproducible model for the prediction of cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in Cairo University Hospitals and University of Bologna Hospitals between November 2018 and November 2019. We recruited 382 primigravidae with singleton term pregnancies in cephalic presentation. All patients had baseline Bishop scoring together with various transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessments of the fetus, maternal cervix, and pelvic floor. The managing obstetricians were blinded to the ultrasound scan findings. The method and indication of induction of labor, the total duration of stages of labor, mode of birth, and neonatal outcomes were all recorded. Women who had operative delivery for fetal distress or indications other than failure to progress in labor were excluded from the final analysis, leaving a total of 344 participants who were randomly divided into 243 and 101 pregnancies that constituted the model development and cross-validation groups, respectively. RESULTS: It was possible to perform transabdominal and transperineal scans and assess all the required parameters on all study participants. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used for selection of potential predictors and model fitting. The independent predictive variables for cesarean delivery included maternal age (odds ratio, 1.12; P¼.003), cervical length (odds ratio, 1.08; P¼.04), angle of progression at rest (odds ratio, 0.9; P¼.001), and occiput posterior position (odds ratio, 5.7; P¼.006). We tested the performance of the prediction model on our cross-validation group. The calculated areas under the curve for the ability of the model to predict cesarean delivery were 0.7969 (95% confidence interval, 0.71e0.87) and 0.88 (95% confidence inte...

Objective To evaluate our ability in classifying the fetal heart as normal or abnormal during the 1st trimester scan through fetal cardiac examination and determining the best time for this examination. Methods This was a prospective study performed on 3240 pregnant women to examine the fetal heart. Four chambers view and ventricular outflow tracts were mainly examined during the scan. We used grayscale and color mapping in the diagnosis. Color Doppler was used if additional information was needed, and all patients were rescanned during the 2nd trimester to confirm or negate our diagnosis. Results The cardiac findings were normal at both scans in 3108 pregnancies. The same cardiac abnormality was detected at both scans in 79 cases. In 36 cases there was false-positive diagnosis at the early scan; in 20 of these cases, there were mildly abnormal functional findings early in pregnancy with no abnormality found later. In 17 fetuses, there was discordance between the early and later diagnosis due to missed or incorrect diagnoses. The best time to do fetal heart examination during 1st trimester is between 13 and 13 + 6 weeks. Conclusion A high degree of accuracy in the identification of congenital heart disease (CHD) can be achieved by a 1st trimester fetal echocardiography.

No abstract

Oral communication abstracts sonohysterography & invited to enter the SISES study. Ninetyeight patients were prospectively recruited. SISES was performed at the end of sonohysterography using a Uterine Explora II Curette at the sight of the endometrial abnormality or at a representative site in the uterine cavity if the endometrial cavity was normal. The histopathologic diagnoses of EMB & SISES were compared to a gold-standard pathological diagnosis obtained on hysteroscopy-D&C or hysterectomy specimen. Kappa values for the two different sampling techniques were compared. Results: Eighty-eight SISES samples were obtained. The Kappa between SISES & final pathology was 0.37 (0.20, 0.53). When comparing EMB to final pathology diagnoses, the Kappa was only 0.13 (−0.03, 0.29). EMB underestimated the incidence of pathology, especially when focal lesions & malignancy were present. This difference was statistically significant, with a P-value of 0.0448. Sonohysterography outperformed both sampling techniques, with a Kappa of 0.74 (0.63, 0.86). Classification n Kappa (95% CI) EMB 51 0.13 (−0.03, 0.29) SISES 88 0.37 (0.20, 0.53) Sonohysterography 91 0.74 (0.63, 0.86) Conclusion: SISES is superior to EMB in diagnosing endometrial pathology in peri-& postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding.

No abstract

Analyses of treatment covariate interactions found no clear evidence that the relative effects of vaginal progesterone or 17-OPHC differed based on cervix length, or by history of a prior preterm birth. However, because the underlying risk of preterm birth is greater at shorter cervical lengths, the absolute risk reductions were greater for women with a shorter cervix. There was no apparent benefit of treatment in the women with a prior preterm birth and cervical length greater than 30 mm.So, what are the clinical conclusions to be drawn from this study? Certainly, it supports use of vaginal progesterone for women with a short cervix.