In this paper, we have carried out an experimental study to investigate the effects of different anesthetics on perioperative organ protection and postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement with cardiopulmonary bypass. To realize this idea, a total of 90 patients with single valve replacement under general anesthesia and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass from January 2020 to October 2021 were enrolled. These patients were assigned into three groups, with 30 cases in each group by the digital table method. Group A was anesthetized with sufentanil combined with dexmedetomidine. Group B was anesthetized with sufentanil combined with etomidate. Group C was anesthetized with sufentanil combined with propofol. Perioperative organ protection and postoperative cognitive function of the three groups were compared. At T0 time point, there was no significant difference in blood WBC, blood N, and CRP among groups A, B, and C ( P > 0.05); At T4 and T5 time points, the indexes of blood WBC, blood N, and CRP in groups A, B, and C were higher compared to the T0 time point. At T4 and T5 time points, the indexes of blood WBC, blood N, and CRP in group A were significantly lower compared to group B and group C. Before treatment, there was no significant difference in ALT and AST among groups A, B, and C ( P > 0.05). After treatment, the indexes of ALT and AST in group A were significantly lower compared to group B and group C at T4 and T5 time points ( P < 0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in urea and creatinine among groups A, B, and C ( P > 0.05). After treatment, the urea and creatinine indexes of group A were significantly lower compared to group B and group C at T4 and T5 time points ( P < 0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in CK-MB and CTnl among groups A, B, and C ( P > 0.05); After treatment, the indexes of CK-MB and CTnl in group A were significantly lower compared to group B and group C at T4 and T5 time points ( P < 0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in MOCA scores among groups A, B, and C ( P > 0.05). After treatment, the MOCA scores of group A were significantly higher compared to group B and group C at T5 and T6 time points ( P < 0.05). Sufentanil combined with dexmedetomidine for heart valve replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass can reduce the dosage of anesthetics during the operation and have a certain perioperative protective effect on important organs such as the heart, lung, liver, and kidney, which may be related to reducing intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations and inhibiting inflammatory stress response.
Isoflurane is a broadly used inhalation anesthetic that causes cognitive impairment in rodent models as well as humans. Although previous studies suggested an association between isoflurane exposure and neuro-inflammation, apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction, the pathogenesis of isoflurane-induced cognitive decline remains elusive. In the present study, 22-month-old male Sprague-Dawley male rats (n=96) were divided into three groups: Control (Cont), isoflurane (ISO) and MS-275 pre-treated groups. The rats were sacrificed following exposure to isoflurane and a cognitive test. The hippocampus of each animal was harvested for quantitative PCR, TUNEL staining and western blot analysis. Histone deacetylases (HDAC)-1,-2 and-3 exhibited a significant increase at the gene and protein expression levels, whereas negligible mRNA expressions were observed for genes HDAC 4-11 (P>0.05; compared with Cont). Pre-treatment with the HDAC inhibitor MS-275 significantly inhibited the increase in TUNEL-positive cells induced by isoflurane exposure (70.72% decrease; P<0.001; compared with ISO). Furthermore, MS-275 significantly decreased caspase-3 and Bax expression levels while increasing Bcl-2 protein expression. The isoflurane-induced changes in the MAPK pathway signaling proteins ERK1/2, JNK and p38 were also reversed with MS-275 pre-treatment. Finally, in a Morris water maze test, the time to find a hidden platform was reduced in MS-275 pre-treated rats, compared with the ISO group. Therefore, the present study provided insight into the effect of isoflurane exposure on neuronal apoptosis pathways, as well as cognitive decline via epigenetic programming of MAPK signaling in aged rats.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remazolam compared with propofol in patients who underwent laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion without the use of muscle relaxant agents during hysteroscopic surgery. Patients and Methods: A total of 72 patients undergoing hysteroscopy with LMA insertion were assigned to two groups. The patients in the remazolam group received 0.3 μg/kg sufentanil, 0.3 mg/kg remazolam and 1.2 mg/kg remifentanil, whereas the patients in the propofol group received 0.3 μg/kg sufentanil, 2.0 mg/kg propofol and 1.2 mg/kg remifentanil for insertion of the LMA. The primary endpoint was the summed score of the insertion conditions. The secondary endpoints included hemodynamics, the duration of induction, the duration of insertion, tidal volume, plateau pressure and adverse events. Results: No difference was identified between the propofol group and remazolam group in the median summed score [18.0 (18.0, 18.0), 18.0 (17.0, 18.0), respectively, P > 0.05]. The induction duration was significantly longer (P < 0.05) in the remazolam group than propofol group. The cost of dopamine (P < 0.05) was significantly lower in the remazolam group compared with the patients in the propofol group, while the plateau pressure (P < 0.05) and the incidence of transient mild laryngospasm (P < 0.05) were significantly higher in the remazolam group. No differences were identified between the two groups in terms of heart rate, tidal volume, injection pain or hiccups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Remazolam provided similar insertion conditions and better hemodynamic stability than propofol during LMA insertion without the use of muscle relaxant agents. However, a higher incidence of transient mild laryngospasm was found in the remazolam group, which should be considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.