This article presented the optimization parameter of a bidirectional soft actuator and evaluated the properties of the actuator. The systematic simulation was conducted to investigate the effect of the top wedged angle (the angle for the wedged shape of the actuator structure) of the chamber on the bending extent of the actuator when it is deflated. We also investigated the width of the actuator and the material combinations of the two layers with the relation to the deformation performance. A mathematical model was also built to reveal the deformation of the actuator as a function of the geometrical parameters of the inner chambers and the material properties. We quantitatively measured the bending radius and the actuation time of the actuator both in air and under water. Digital particle image velocimetry experiments were conducted under water to observe the flow patterns around the actuator. We found that the top wedged angle has a significant effect on the outward bending of the actuator when it is deflated, and 15 was found to be optimal for bending into a larger gripping space. The result shows that the actuator can deform much easier with a bigger width. Utilizing a soft gripper that was built by mounting four actuators to a three-dimensional-printed rigid support, we found that the prototype can grip objects of different sizes, shapes, and material stiffness in amphibious environments.
The present study was undertaken to develop a relatively quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in-house using human leukocyte antigen class II-restricted epitopes in order to test circulating autoantibodies to human forkhead/winged helix transcription factor (FOXP3) as a biomarker for esophageal cancer. A total of 97 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and 227 healthy subjects were recruited for this study, and their plasma samples were collected for antibody analysis with the ELISA approach. Student's t test showed that the anti-FOXP3 IgG antibody levels were significantly higher in the patient group than the control group (t=6.23, P<0.0001). Based on a cutoff value determined by the mean+3SD of control IgG levels, the positive rate was 5.15 % in patients with ESCC as compared to 0.88 % in control subjects (X (2) =6.53, P=0.019, OR=5.85, 95 % CI 1.12-30.67), in which patients at stage I had the highest positivity (11.54 %, X (2) =12.15, P=0.0005, OR=13.10, 95 % CI 2.09-82.04). The sensitivity against >95 % specificity was 22.7 % for the IgG assay with an inter-assay deviation of 13.35 %. This work suggests that circulating IgG autoantibody to FOXP3 may be a potential biomarker for early diagnosis of esophageal cancer.
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) combined with corticosteroids in treating patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). One hundred seventy-seven biopsy-proven IMN patients were recruited in this retrospective clinical study. Sixty patients received TAC (target blood concentration of 4–8 ng/mL) and 117 patients received daily cyclophosphamide (CYC, 100 mg) combined with prednisone. Remission rates at the end of the first, second and third month in the TAC group were significantly higher than that in the CYC group (1st: 35.0 vs 19.7%, P<0.05; 2nd: 56.7 vs 38.5%, P<0.05; 3rd: 76.7 vs 59.0%, P<0.05). In the first 3 months, daily urinary protein and serum albumin in the TAC group obtained a better improvement than that in the CYC group (P<0.05). At the end of the sixth and the twelfth month, the remission rates, daily urinary protein and serum albumin were all comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). No significant difference of relapse rate between the groups was found (16.3 vs 12.0%, P>0.05). Patients were more likely to develop glucose intolerance in the TAC group. The TAC regimen obtained more benefits in treating IMN patients, especially in the first 3 months, than the CYC regimen.
Overexpression of tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) has been reported in many types of cancer and may trigger secretion of their autoantibodies. The present work was thus designed to test whether circulating antibody to p16 protein-derived antigens was altered in lung cancer. Two hundred seventy-one patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 226 control subjects matched in age, gender, and smoking history were recruited in this study. The levels of circulating anti-p16 IgA and IgG antibodies were tested using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) developed in-house with linear peptide antigens derived from p16 protein. Student’s t test showed that patients with NSCLC had a significant higher level of anti-p16 IgG antibody than control subjects (t = 2.74, P = 0.0063) but did not have a significant increase in IgA antibody levels (t = 1.92, P = 0.056). The sensitivity against >90% specificity was 19.7% for the IgG assay with an inter-assay deviation of 11.6%, and 10.3% for the IgA assay with an inter-assay deviation of 14.7%. Based on a cut-off value determined by the 99th percentile of control IgG levels, the anti-p16 IgG positivity was 6.7% in patients with NSCLC compared to 0.88% in control subjects (χ (2) = 10.58, P = 0.001, OR = 7.97, 95% CI 1.84–34.85). Circulating anti-p16 IgG levels were increased with stages of NSCLC, and patients with stage IV NSCLC had the highest IgG level among all four stages (t = 2.42, P = 0.016, compared with the control group). Pearson correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between circulating levels of IgA and IgG in the patient group (r = −0.2, df = 236, P = 0.0021) but not in the control group (r = −0.1, df = 205, P = 0.146). Circulating IgG antibody to p16 protein may be a potential biomarker with prognostic values for lung cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.