A wide range of Monte Carlo models have been applied to predict yields of DNA damage based on nanoscale track structure calculations. While often similar on the macroscopic scale, these models frequently employ different assumptions which lead to significant differences in nanoscale dose deposition. However, the impact of these differences on key biological readouts remains unclear. A major challenge in this area is the lack of robust datasets which can be used to benchmark models, due to a lack of resolution at the base pair level required to deeply test nanoscale dose deposition. Studies investigating the distribution of strand breakage in short DNA strands following the decay of incorporated 125I offer one of the few benchmarks for model predictions on this scale. In this work, we have used TOPAS-nBio to evaluate the performance of three Geant4-DNA physics models at predicting the distribution and yield of strand breaks in this irradiation scenario. For each model, energy and OH radical distributions were simulated and used to generate predictions of strand breakage, varying energy thresholds for strand breakage and OH interaction rates to fit to the experimental data. All three models could fit well to the observed data, although the best-fitting strand break energy thresholds ranged from 29.5 to 32.5 eV, significantly higher than previous studies. However, despite well describing the resulting DNA fragment distribution, these fit models differed significantly with other endpoints, such as the total yield of breaks, which varied by 70%. Limitations in the underlying data due to inherent normalisation mean it is not possible to distinguish clearly between the models in terms of total yield. This suggests that, while these physics models can effectively fit some biological data, they may not always generalise in the same way to other endpoints, requiring caution in their extrapolation to new systems and the use of multiple different data sources for robust model benchmarking.
There is agreement that high-LET radiation has a high Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) when delivered as a single treatment, but how it interacts with radiations of different qualities, such as X-rays, is less clear. We sought to clarify these effects by quantifying and modelling responses to X-ray and alpha particle combinations. Cells were exposed to X-rays, alpha particles, or combinations, with different doses and temporal separations. DNA damage was assessed by 53BP1 immunofluorescence, and radiosensitivity assessed using the clonogenic assay. Mechanistic models were then applied to understand trends in repair and survival. 53BP1 foci yields were significantly reduced in alpha particle exposures compared to X-rays, but these foci were slow to repair. Although alpha particles alone showed no inter-track interactions, substantial interactions were seen between X-rays and alpha particles. Mechanistic modelling suggested that sublethal damage (SLD) repair was independent of radiation quality, but that alpha particles generated substantially more sublethal damage than a similar dose of X-rays, $$RB{E}_{SLD}>2.8$$ R B E SLD > 2.8 . This high RBE may lead to unexpected synergies for combinations of different radiation qualities which must be taken into account in treatment design, and the rapid repair of this damage may impact on mechanistic modelling of radiation responses to high LETs.
Objective: Laser-accelerated protons offer an alternative delivery mechanism for proton therapy. This technique delivers dose-rates of ≥109 Gy/s, many orders of magnitude greater than used clinically. Such ultra-high dose-rates reduce delivery time to nanoseconds, equivalent to the lifetime of reactive chemical species within a biological medium. This leads to the possibility of inter-track interactions between successive protons within a pulse, potentially altering the yields of damaging radicals if they are in sufficient spatial proximity. This work investigates the temporal evolution of chemical species for a range of proton energies and doses to quantify the circumstances required for inter-track interactions, and determine any relevance within ultra-high dose-rate proton therapy. Approach: The TOPAS-nBio Monte Carlo toolkit was used to investigate possible inter-track interactions. Firstly, protons between 0.5 and 100 MeV were simulated to record the radial track dimensions throughout the chemical stage from 1 ps to 1 µs. Using the track areas, the geometric probability of track overlap was calculated for various exposures and timescales. A sample of irradiations were then simulated in detail to compare any change in chemical yields for independently and instantaneously delivered tracks, and validate the analytic model. Main results: Track overlap for a clinical 2 Gy dose was negligible for biologically relevant timepoints for all energies. Overlap probability increased with time after irradiation, proton energy and dose, with a minimum 23 Gy dose required before significant track overlap occurred. Simulating chemical interactions confirmed these results with no change in radical yields seen up to 8 Gy for independently and instantaneously delivered tracks. Significance: These observations suggest that the spatial separation between incident protons is too large for physico-chemical inter-track interactions, regardless of the delivery time, indicating such interactions would not play a role in any potential changes in biological response between laser-accelerated and conventional proton therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.