2022
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Iodine-125 DNA Damage Benchmarks of Monte Carlo DNA Damage Models

Abstract: A wide range of Monte Carlo models have been applied to predict yields of DNA damage based on nanoscale track structure calculations. While often similar on the macroscopic scale, these models frequently employ different assumptions which lead to significant differences in nanoscale dose deposition. However, the impact of these differences on key biological readouts remains unclear. A major challenge in this area is the lack of robust datasets which can be used to benchmark models, due to a lack of resolution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A distance threshold for DSB, denoted as dDSB, of 3, 5, and 10 BP intervals was considered. Additionally, similar definitions for SSBs were applied to the semi-cylindrical Thompson geometry, incorporating physical and chemical reactions as physical reactions within each semi-cylinder at the BP location, with a threshold energy deposition value of 17.5 eV, as detailed in relevant publications [9,17,18]. Furthermore, our simulation focused solely on the interaction between radiation and matter within the DNA structure and did not account for potential biological interactions such as nucleobase damage and its role in SSB and DSB formation.…”
Section: Single Strand Break (Ssb) and Double Strand Break (Dsb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distance threshold for DSB, denoted as dDSB, of 3, 5, and 10 BP intervals was considered. Additionally, similar definitions for SSBs were applied to the semi-cylindrical Thompson geometry, incorporating physical and chemical reactions as physical reactions within each semi-cylinder at the BP location, with a threshold energy deposition value of 17.5 eV, as detailed in relevant publications [9,17,18]. Furthermore, our simulation focused solely on the interaction between radiation and matter within the DNA structure and did not account for potential biological interactions such as nucleobase damage and its role in SSB and DSB formation.…”
Section: Single Strand Break (Ssb) and Double Strand Break (Dsb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSB = double-strand break; LET = linear energy transfer. Journal of the ICRU 23(1)1-165 2020; Sakata et al, 2019;Tang et al, 2020;Thibault et al, 2022;Thompson et al, 2022). Development of the Geant4-DNA platform for radiobiological applications included incorporation of a feature allowing for prediction of DNA rejoining kinetics and corresponding cell surviving fraction as a function of time.…”
Section: Track Structure For Simulation Of Consequent Biological Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Geant4-DNA platform has since been applied in many studies of damage to the DNA molecule and its higher-order structures in mammalian cells (Figs. 9.17 and 9.18) and other organisms exposed to many radiation types, including those of interest in radiotherapy, space travel, and radiobiology (Chatzipapas et al , 2020; 2021; 2023; Dominguez-Kondo et al , 2021; Dos Santos et al , 2020; Henthorn et al , 2017; Hilgers et al , 2022; Incerti et al , 2016; 2020; Kyriakou et al , 2021; 2022; Lee and Wang, 2019; Margis et al , 2020; Moeini et al , 2020; Mokari et al , 2020; Sakata et al , 2019; Tang et al , 2020; Thibault et al , 2022; Thompson et al , 2022). Development of the Geant4-DNA platform for radiobiological applications included incorporation of a feature allowing for prediction of DNA rejoining kinetics and corresponding cell surviving fraction as a function of time.…”
Section: Applications Of Stochastic Characteristics Of Radiation Inte...mentioning
confidence: 99%