IMPORTANCE Therapies that improve survival in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are needed. Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin 6 receptor, may counteract the inflammatory cytokine release syndrome in patients with severe COVID-19 illness. OBJECTIVE To test whether tocilizumab decreases mortality in this population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The data for this study were derived from a multicenter cohort study of 4485 adults with COVID-19 admitted to participating intensive care units (ICUs) at 68 hospitals across the US from March 4 to May 10, 2020. Critically ill adults with COVID-19 were categorized according to whether they received or did not receive tocilizumab in the first 2 days of admission to the ICU. Data were collected retrospectively until June 12, 2020. A Cox regression model with inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for confounding. EXPOSURES Treatment with tocilizumab in the first 2 days of ICU admission. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Time to death, compared via hazard ratios (HRs), and 30-day mortality, compared via risk differences. RESULTS Among the 3924 patients included in the analysis (2464 male [62.8%]; median age, 62 [interquartile range {IQR}, 52-71] years), 433 (11.0%) received tocilizumab in the first 2 days of ICU admission. Patients treated with tocilizumab were younger (median age, 58 [IQR, 48-65] vs 63 [IQR, 52-72] years) and had a higher prevalence of hypoxemia on ICU admission (205 of 433 [47.3%] vs 1322 of 3491 [37.9%] with mechanical ventilation and a ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen of <200 mm Hg) than patients not treated with tocilizumab. After applying inverse probability weighting, baseline and severity-of-illness characteristics were well balanced between groups. A total of 1544 patients (39.3%) died, including 125 (28.9%) treated with tocilizumab and 1419 (40.6%) not treated with tocilizumab. In the primary analysis, during a median follow-up of 27 (IQR, 14-37) days, patients treated with tocilizumab had a lower risk of death compared with those not treated with tocilizumab (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92). The estimated 30-day mortality was 27.5% (95% CI, 21.2%-33.8%) in the tocilizumab-treated patients and 37.1% (95% CI, 35.5%-38.7%) in the non-tocilizumab-treated patients (risk difference, 9.6%; 95% CI, 3.1%-16.0%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among critically ill patients with COVID-19 in this cohort study, the risk of in-hospital mortality in this study was lower in patients treated with tocilizumab in the first 2 days of ICU admission compared with patients whose treatment did not include early use of tocilizumab. However, the findings may be susceptible to unmeasured confounding, and further research from randomized clinical trials is needed.

Complete author and article information provided before references.

Intralesional immunotherapy is an effective treatment of warts. This method has a better therapeutic response, needs fewer sessions, and is capable of treating distant warts.

Objective: To describe the clinical and pathological phenotype of membranous nephropathy (MN) associated with M-type-phospholipaseeA 2 -receptor (PLA 2 R), thrombospondin-type-1-domain-containing-7A (THSD7A), semaphorin 3B (SEMA3B), neural-epidermal-growth-factor-like-1-protein (NELL-1), protocadherin 7 (PCDH7), exostosin 1/exostosin 2 (EXT1/EXT2) and neural cell adhesion molecule 1 (NCAM-1) as target antigens. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 270 adult patients with biopsy-proven MN diagnosed between January 2015 and April 2020 was classified as PLA 2 R-, THSD7A-, SEMA3B-, NELL-1e, PCDH7-, EXT1/EXT2-, NCAM-1eassociated or septuple-negative MN using serologic tests, immunostaining, and/or mass spectrometry. Clinical, biochemical, pathologic, and follow-up data were systematically abstracted from the medical records, including disease activity of conditions traditionally associated with MN and occurring within 5 years of MN diagnosis. Results: Patients with PLA 2 R-associated MN were predominantly middle-aged white men without associated disease. The presence of associated disease did not affect the clinical and pathologic characteristics of PLA 2 R-associated MN, suggesting that they were coincidental rather than causally linked. THSD7A-, NELL-1e, PCDH7-, and NCAM-1eassociated MN were rare and SEMA3Bassociated MN was not discovered in our cohort. EXT1/EXT2-associated MN was primarily diagnosed in younger women with active systemic autoimmunity. A significant proportion of septuple-negative patients had associated malignancy or systemic autoimmunity. Conclusion:The widely used distinction between primary and secondary MN has limitations. We propose a refined terminology that combines the target antigen and associated disease to better classify MN and guide clinical decision making.

Hepatobiliary scintigraphy is an important diagnostic modality for work-up of neonatal cholestasis. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the literature regarding the accuracy of hepatobiliary scintigraphy in differentiating biliary atresia from non-biliary atresia causes of cholestasis (collectively called neonatal hepatitis). Our search included Medline, SCOPUS and Google Scholar. Only studies using Tc-99 m-labeled immunodiacetic acid (IDA) derivatives were included. Overall, 81 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 98.7% (range 98.1-99.2%) and 70.4% (range 68.5-72.2%), respectively. Factors that increased specificity included the use of radiotracers with high hepatic extraction, administration of hepatic-inducing drugs (such as phenobarbital), use of a calculated dose/kg and administration of a booster dose in cases of non-excretion of the tracer in the bowel. SPECT imaging and duodenal fluid sampling also had high specificity; however, they need further validation because of the low number of studies. Semiquantitative imaging methods do not seem to have any incremental value. We conclude that hepatobiliary scintigraphy using IDA derivatives can be very useful for diagnostic work-up of neonatal cholestasis. To improve the specificity, several measures can be followed regarding type and dose of the radiotracer and imaging protocols. Non-imaging methods seem to be promising and warrant further validation.