The devastating Haiti earthquake rightly resulted in an outpouring of international aid. Relief teams can be of tremendous value during disasters due to natural hazards. Although nobly motivated to help, all emergency interventions have unintended consequences. In the immediate aftermath of the earthquake, many selfless individuals committed to help, but was this really all in the name of reaching out a helping hand? This case report illustrates that medical disaster tourism is alive and well. IntroductionOn 12 January 2010, a 7.0 magnitude earthquake crumbled the capital of Haiti to the ground. The world watched as this devastating event resulted in an outpouring of international aid and well-intentioned disaster relief teams raced to Port-au-Prince to help. But was this really all in the name of reaching out a helping hand, or were we witnessing disaster tourism?Three authors were volunteers who responded in the immediate aftermath of the earthquake, where, among the many selfless individuals committed only to doing the right thing, we experienced disaster tourism first-hand. Our ordeal illustrates that medical disaster tourism is alive and well; we wonder whether the medical fraternity should hang its head in shame.

No abstract

Out-of-hospital emergency care (OHEC) should be accessible to all who require it. However, available data suggests that there are a number of barriers to such access in Africa, mainly centred around challenges in public knowledge, perception and appropriate utilisation of OHEC. Having reached consensus in 2013 on a two-tier system of African OHEC, the African Federation for Emergency Medicine (AFEM) OHEC Group sought to gain further consensus on the narrower subject of access to OHEC in Africa. The objective of this paper is to report the outputs and statements arising from the AFEM OHEC access consensus meeting held in Cape Town, South Africa in April 2015. The discussion was structured around six dimensions of access to care (i.e. awareness, availability, accessibility, accommodation, affordability and acceptability) and tackled both Tier-1 (community first responder) and Tier-2 (formal prehospital services and Emergency Medical Services) OHEC systems. In Tier-1 systems, the role of community involvement and support was emphasised, along with the importance of a first responder system acceptable to the community in which it is embedded in order to optimise access. In Tier-2 systems, the consensus group highlighted the primacy of a single toll-free emergency number, matching of Emergency Medical Services resource demand and availability through appropriate planning and the cost-free nature of Tier-2 emergency care, amongst other factors that impact accessibility. Much work is still needed in prioritising the steps and clarifying the tools and metrics that would enable the ideal of optimal access to OHEC in Africa.

Background Sub-Saharan Africa bears a disproportionate burden of mortality from trauma. District hospitals, although not trauma centres, play a critical role in the trauma care system by serving as frontline hospitals. However, the clinical characteristics of patients receiving trauma care in African district hospitals remains under-described and is a barrier to trauma care system development. We aim to describe the burden of trauma at district hospitals by analysing trauma patients at a prototypical district hospital emergency centre. Methods An observational study was conducted in August, 2014 at Wesfleur Hospital, a district facility in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Data were manually collected from a paper registry for all patients visiting the emergency centre. Patients with trauma were selected for further analysis. Results Of 3299 total cases, 565 (17.1%) presented with trauma, of which 348 (61.6%) were male. Of the trauma patients, 256 (47.6%) were ages 18–34 and 298 (52.7%) presented on the weekend. Intentional injuries (assault, stab wounds, and gunshot wounds) represented 251 (44.4%) cases of trauma. There were 314 (55.6%) cases of injuries that were unintentional, including road traffic injuries. There were 144 (60%) intentionally injured patients that arrived overnight (7pm–7am). Patients with intentional injuries were three times more likely to be transferred (to higher levels of care) or admitted than patients with unintentional injuries. Conclusion This district hospital emergency centre, with a small complement of non-EM trained physicians and no trauma surgical services, cared for a high volume of trauma with over half presenting on weekends and overnight when personnel are limited. The high volume and rate of admission/ transfer of intentional injuries suggests the need for improving prehospital trauma triage and trauma referrals. The results suggest strengthening trauma care systems at and around this resource-limited district hospital in South Africa may help alleviate the high burden of post-trauma morbidity and mortality.

BackgroundPrehospital (ambulance) care can reduce morbidity and mortality from trauma. Yet, there is a dearth of effective evidence-based interventions and implementation strategies. Emergency Medical Services Traumatic Shock Care (EMS-TruShoC) is a novel bundle of five core evidence-based trauma care interventions. High-Efficiency EMS Training (HEET) is an innovative training and sensitization program conducted during clinical shifts in ambulances. We assess the feasibility of implementing EMS-TruShoC using the HEET strategy, and feasibility of assessing implementation and clinical outcomes. Findings will inform a main trial.MethodsWe conducted a single-site, prospective cohort, multi-methods pilot implementation study in Western Cape EMS system of South Africa. Of the 120 providers at the study site, 12 were trainers and the remaining were eligible learners. Feasibility of implementation was guided by the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework. Feasibility of assessing clinical outcomes was assessed using shock indices and clinical quality of care scores, collected via abstraction of patients’ prehospital trauma charts. Thresholds for progression to a main trial were developed a priori.ResultsThe average of all implementation indices was 83% (standard deviation = 10.3). Reach of the HEET program was high, with 84% learners completing at least 75% of training modules. Comparing the proportion of learners attaining perfect scores in post- versus pre-implementation assessments, there was an 8-fold (52% vs. 6%) improvement in knowledge, 3-fold (39% vs. 12%) improvement in skills, and 2-fold (42% vs. 21%) increase in self-efficacy. Clinical outcomes data were successfully calculated—there were clinically significant improvements in shock indices and quality of prehospital trauma care in the post- versus pre-implementation phases. Adoption of HEET was good, evidenced by 83% of facilitator participation in trainings, and 100% of surveyed stakeholders indicating good programmatic fit for their organization. Stakeholders responded that HEET was a sustainable educational solution that aligned well with their organization. Implementation fidelity was very high; 90% of the HEET intervention and 77% of the implementation strategy were delivered as originally planned. Participants provided very positive feedback, and explained that on-the-job timing enhanced their participation. Maintenance was not relevant to assess in this pilot study.ConclusionsWe successfully implemented the EMS-TruShoC educational intervention using the HEET training strategy in a single-site pilot study conducted in a low-resource international setting. All clinical outcomes were successfully calculated. Overall, this pilot study suggests high feasibility of our future, planned experimental trial.

Tackling gender power relations is key to ensuring the safety and wellbeing of health workers and the ability to deliver quality care, say Asha George and colleagues

BACKGROUND:Civilian and military populations alike are increasingly faced with undesirable situations in which prehospital and definitive care times will be delayed. The Western Cape of South Africa has some similarities in capabilities, injury profiles, resource limitations, and system configuration to US military prolonged casualty care (PCC) settings. This study provides an initial description of civilians in the Western Cape who experience PCC and compares the PCC and non-PCC populations. METHODS:We conducted a 6-month analysis of an ongoing, prospective, large-scale epidemiologic study of prolonged trauma care in the Western Cape (Epidemiology and Outcomes of Prolonged Trauma Care [EpiC]). We define PCC as ≥10 hours from injury to arrival at definitive care. We describe patient characteristics, critical interventions, key times, and outcomes as they may relate to military PCC and compare these using χ 2 and Wilcoxon tests. We estimated the associations between PCC status and the primary and secondary outcomes using logistic regression models. RESULTS:Of 995 patients, 146 experienced PCC. The PCC group, compared with non-PCC, were more critically injured (66% vs. 51%), received more critical interventions (36% vs. 29%), and had a greater proportionate mortality (5% vs. 3%), longer hospital stays (3 vs. 1 day), and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (5 vs. 3). The odds of 7-day mortality and a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of ≥5 were 1.6 (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-3.74) and 3.6 (odds ratio, 3.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.11-6.42) times higher, respectively, in PCC versus non-PCC patients. CONCLUSION:The EpiC study enrolled critically injured patients with PCC who received resuscitative interventions. Prolonged casualty care patients had worse outcomes than non-PCC. The EpiC study will be a useful platform to provide ongoing data for PCC relevant analyses, for future PCC-focused interventional studies, and to develop PCC protocols and algorithms. Findings will be relevant to the Western Cape, South Africa, other LMICs, and military populations experiencing prolonged care.

Emergency medical dispatch (EMD) systems are a crucial component of effective Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems. They provide a means of public access to emergency care information and out-of-hospital emergency care resources and expertise. EMD systems also link various components of EMS, thereby improving efficiency and performance. As EMS systems are rapidly developing across many parts of Africa, EMD systems which are context appropriate are in great need, but are mostly absent despite the wide availability of telecommunications technology. To facilitate the development of EMD systems appropriate for the African setting, the African Federation for Emergency Medicine (AFEM) and the International Academies of Emergency Dispatch (IAED) convened a working group in November 2014 to provide conceptual, technical, and innovative recommendations for contextually appropriate EMD systems for African settings. It is hoped that these recommendations will augment efficiency, effectiveness, and standardisation within and among African EMD systems, thereby improving health outcomes for sufferers of acute illness or injury.Les syste`mes de Re´partition me´dicale d'urgence (RMU) repre´sentent une composante cruciale des syste`mes efficaces d'Aide me´dicale urgente (SAMU). Ils fournissent un moyen d'acce`s public a`l'information sur les soins d'urgence et aux ressources et expertise en soins d'urgence hors de l'hoˆpital. Les syste`mes de RMU font e´galement le lien entre divers composants de l'AMU, ame´liorant ainsi l'efficacite´et la performance. Alors que les syte`mes d'AMU se de´veloppent rapidement dans de nombreuses re´gions de l'Afrique, il existe un grand besoin de syste`mes de RMU adapte´s au contexte, souvent absents malgre´la grande disponibilite´des technologies de te´le´com munications. Pour faciliter le de´veloppement de syste`mes de RMU approprie´s au contexte africain, la Fe´de´ration africaine de me´decine d'urgence (AFEM, African Federation for Emergency Medicine) et les Acade´mies internationales de re´partition d'urgence (IAED, International Academies of Emergency Dispatch) ont convoque´un groupe de travail en novembre 2014 pour fournir des recommandations conceptuelles, techniques et innovantes aux syste`mes de RMU adapte´s au contexte africain. Il est a`espe´rer que ces recommandations augmenteront l'efficacite´, l'efficience et la normalisation au sein et entre les syste`mes de RMU africains, ame´liorant ainsi les re´sultats en termes de sante´pour les personnes souffrant de maladie aigue¨ou de blessures. African relevanceEmergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) systems are a critical component of, and point of public access into, emergency care systems.